(not satire)
“Oh what a tangled web we weave when first we practice to deceive“- Sir Walter Scott
Today the Mail on Sunday did a hatchet job on the child abuse victim Steven Messham in an attempt to discredit him as a witness after he mistakenly identified Lord McAlpine as his attacker – a mistake which it now seems was a direct result of misleading information given to him by North Wales Police.
See this previous article for more information about that:
It was the police – not the BBC – who wrongly named Lord McAlpine in abuse allegations
I make no apology for telling you my heart went out to Mr Messham when I read the Mail on Sunday piece attacking him. It seemed to me he was being abused all over again.
The article in the Mail on Sunday is clearly an attempt on the part of sections of the British establishment to strike back at allegations which potentially could bring down some of its most powerful members, and Mr Messham is probably just collateral damage in their eyes.
But what’s most interesting for me about the disgusting article is its author – a man called David Rose.
Who is he?
Oh what a can of worms that question turns out to be.
David Rose seems to be what is known by some people in the trade as a ‘fixer’.
‘Fixers’ obviously ‘fix’ things – in his case, Rose specialises in ‘fixing’ tricky problems which are inconveniencing parts of the more conservative parts of the establishment – by using spin, disinformation and pure lies.
In fact, he’s been specialising in discrediting victims who have accused establishment figures of child abuse for some years now, as well as trying to discredit child abuse investigations as a whole – see here and here.
But interestingly, Rose is also a major player in the disinformation campaign being waged by powerful oil interests and right-wing politicians keen to deny the human causes of climate change.
As well as the disinformation campaign that was waged before the invasion of Iraq – see here.
OK. So the person responsible for the disgraceful attack on one of the child abuse victims in today’s Mail on Sunday is a batshit-crazy, climate-change denying establishment fixer in the pay of a powerful right-wing establishment.
Probably.
However, it seems there may be more than one journalist called David Rose. And some people in the industry are not even all that sure whether David Rose actually even exists at all. David Allen Green, writer of the ‘Jack of Kent’ blog tells me ‘his’ David Rose definitely doesn’t exist – see his blog here.
On the other hand, according to the indefatigable Ian Bone – he does exist because he tells me he actually met Rose way back in 1985 – see Ian’s blog about it here.
I think before we allow the reputation of a brave survivor of child sexual abuse to be trashed, we should know exactly who his accuser is, don’t you?
So will the real David Rose please stand up? Come out come out David, whoever you are.
.
For more information on the disinformation campaign being waged to discredit child abuse investigations, see Rico Sorda’s excellent blog here:
Please help to counter the disinformation campaign against child abuse victims by sharing this with as many people as possible. Thanks:
buddyhell said:
Reblogged this on Guy Debord's Cat and commented:
Excellent blog from Pride’s Purge that pretty much follows on from yesterday’s blog about the establishment backlash. The Tories are well versed in the art of disinformation, spin and smears. The Conservative Research Department’s job, among other things, is to find dirt on their opponents and to cover up inconvenient truths.
LikeLike
Teddy (@TeddyShepherd) said:
Glad to see you have picked up on this dreadful hack, or as the yanks would describe him, a Shill. A quick Twitter hashtag search for this morning alone, will bring further results on other issues.
Keep it up.
LikeLike
Babs said:
David Rose is alias real name is Johann Hari…discredits others so his information is not to be believed..
LikeLike
M.K. Hajdin (Exiled Star) said:
Yes, he would be called a shill! Or a hack. Both are equally fitting.
Thanks for this great analysis. More and more I am beginning to realize that unpaid bloggers are the only people telling the truth.
LikeLike
Geraldine Mitchell said:
That is very interesting ……but I also agree that to use Mr Messham this way is to abuse him all over again. How the focus of concern keeps disappearing from the abused to the accused (if dead) and excused (if alive) is very much what children who are abused by adults feel,,,,,that you can not trust the adult world around you, that the world is controlled by secrecy and lies, and that ultimately you are powerless and if you were to tell anyone what is happening they would either not believe you or they would punish you. If anyone should be apologising in media it is this writer and to the real victims in all this.
LikeLike
jeffrey davies (@jeffrey33333) said:
its as if the worlds gone mad whot about the man and those who where abused by people its not good enough news they can and do turn around to suit whilst this persons gets abused again disgusting and they all should hang their heads in shame for making him out a lier news na guuter press jeff3
LikeLike
Robert Anthony Frederick said:
How is it Justice for anyone until the facts have been established and supposition just follows supposition….Truth should be the victor not opinion or even assumption and in order for that to happen people have to come to their senses not propagate the Lynch Mob’s blood lust!
LikeLike
Pingback: It was the police – not the BBC – who wrongly named Lord McAlpine in abuse allegations « Pride's Purge
veganpanda said:
Thanks, a really good article which should be all over the mainstream media (inc news), the abused should never be attacked, they should be totally supported!
LikeLike
Lee Grice said:
David Rose is apparently Johann Hari
http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/david-allen-green/2011/09/hari-rose-wikipedia-admitted
LikeLike
Reuben said:
I’m confused. In the Jack Of Kent blog you link to it says “I am happy to point out that “David Rose” is not the David Rose who is Assistant News Editor of The Times, or the David Rose, formerly of the Guardian, Observer and BBC, and who currently writes for the Mail on Sunday and Vanity Fair”. The Mail’s Rose seems to have written all kinds of articles for them. So are you saying the Mail journalist also works as a ‘fixer’?
LikeLike
Tom Pride said:
I know what you mean about being confused.
I think the Jack of Kent blogger is just covering himself from being sued by denying he’s talking about specific ‘David Roses’ at the beginning of his article.
I’ve seen an article where the ‘Mail’ David Rose actually admits himself he’s the ‘Observer’ David Rose.
LikeLike
Harry said:
Well, apart from Johann Hari’s David Rose, and the (non-existent) disabled blogger David Rose. Perhaps “David Rose” is an in-house joke for hacks?
LikeLike
Jamie said:
Quick search, and here is David Rose… http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1221151/DAVID-ROSE-How-I-took-Foreign-Secretary-won.html … sorry, it’s a link to the vile rag itself.
LikeLike
Jamie said:
Oh, and worth being wary. The far-right have him down to be attacked because he looks Jewish. I always like to see who I’m standing next to at the barricades.
LikeLike
Gorton said:
See here: https://twitter.com/DRoseMoS
There are two David Roses at the MoS. Neither of them are anything to do with Johann Hari, which is what the JoK blog was about.
LikeLike
woman on the edge of tyne said:
thankyou for this great bit of research. I was sickened to see a victim of child abuse being forced to make a public apology to someone he didn’t even name. I am even more disgusted by the vile mail on sunday hack job on him.
LikeLike
gfmurphy101 said:
Reblogged this on gfmurphy101.
LikeLike
Pingback: The Internet Fights Back. | theneedleblog
BenSix said:
It’s either this real person or this real person.
LikeLike
ianbone said:
Unfortunately david rose does exist – I met him in 1985 when he was spreading disinformation as usual…….he even outed himself in the New statesman a few years back as a security services patsy…see more at http://www.ianbone.wordpress.com
LikeLike
Tom Pride said:
Cheers Ian. Glad to know it’s not just me. I’ve put a link in the main blog.
Funnily enough you and I met once briefly too – coincidentally also probably round about 1985.
LikeLike
adeybob said:
is johann Hari @meuanthgbmdg aka #davidrose ; one of those doing a sponsored hatchetjob on one of “the little people” today?
Follow the clues I found in this 2011 blog: http://jackofkent.blogspot.co.uk/2011/07/who-is-david-rose.html
LikeLike
bobchewie said:
Tom i keep telling you i wish you would listen. This is clearly the spooks dept at ‘mfi’ its got all their fingerprints written all over it. Remember thar report i sent you and the funny club members. ??
LikeLike
adeybob said:
johann Hari @meuanthgbmdg …I think
LikeLike
Callie said:
Messham did NOT make a mistake based on a police error. The fact is he has been questioned about this before and could not provide a coherent answer then. Whatever makes you think he could do so 10 years later? How do you explain that he claimed on TV that this person had rung him up, told him who he was, and threatened him?
It’s no good you getting upset, belatedly, that a damaged man has been put in a situation that can only damage him further. All because Angus Stickler was chasing a story he should have known over a decade ago was never going to court. The lot of you should be ashamed of yourselves, the whole conspiracy rentamob briefly took over the entire friggin asylum.
And what did it take to stop it? One man to say ‘libel’ softly.
LikeLike
Mr Mossad , killing is our bushiness ,we take over where the SS left off said:
mossad!
LikeLike
adeybob said:
is this the chap…? the cover company fits, and he has the right profile and followers: johann Hari @meuanthgbmdg
LikeLike
zoompad said:
David Rose was one of them on the select committee in 2002 when they tried to stop the police being able to investigate institutional child abuse. David Cameron was on it as well, look:
http://zoompad.blogspot.com/2011/07/david-cameron-was-on-select-committee.html
I am one of the Staffordshire Pindown child abuse survivors. I have written to all the politicians about the Pindown abuse and cover up, and not many of them seem to care, only one or two like Clare Short and I think she didnt really know what the hell to do about it.
LikeLike
Tom Pride said:
Believe me, there’s nothing ‘soft’ about being on the receiving end of libel threats by the rich and the powerful.
LikeLike
zoompad said:
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200102/cmselect/cmhaff/836/2051402.htm
LikeLike
bobchewie said:
If the spooks are spying on activist groups which they are as youve seen the evidence does it not follow that they would do this discredit shit on someone in order to keep quiet the shit with the establishment?
LikeLike
Tom Pride said:
Extremely interesting. Thanks.
LikeLike
zoompad said:
Sorry to hog it but this is important as well, because David Rose, Bob Woffinden (one of Jonathan Kings friends) and Richard Webster were the three dodgy journalists who trashed the Haut de la Garenne police investigation, and all three were on that 2002 Select Committee with David Scameron, who seems to have completly forgotten all about it!
http://zoompad.blogspot.com/2011/01/richard-webster-and-haut-de-la-garenne.html
LikeLike
bobchewie said:
Remember that funny london club and all its mates? Am sure thats where the nest of vipers are. Tom. Remember the stuff i sent you? Tell you anything?
LikeLike
Drew said:
Let us all keep our powder dry here in the blogsphere.
The exchange of ideas on the net is clearly an irritant to the political spinners and legal smoke shovellers…
This is where the centre of gravity is for meaningful journalism and intellectual conscience
My heart felt thanks to Tim Berners Lee for bringing us the notable blogging talents and politically aware people of the world!
LikeLike
bobchewie said:
This is NOT conspiracy nut theorist shit by the way.
LikeLike
Bedford Burrow said:
Reblogged this on Bedford Burrow and commented:
This interesting little piece captures just what is happening; we can see you Mr Reporter, we can see through you.
LikeLike
bobchewie said:
What was bridget prentice doing on that commitee with scameron ? I met her a few times ages ago ..
LikeLike
Matt Noble (@mightynobble) said:
That’s a different David Rose. There are a few: Johann Hari’s imaginary one, one from the Mail on Sunday, formerly of The Times who didn’t write this article (@drosemos), and one who freelances at the Mail on Sunday, also writes for Vanity Fair who did write this article. Then there was the fake blogger who pretended to die.
LikeLike
bobchewie said:
Its not just the who. Its the why. Because its all a smokescreen to cover up something thats for sure. Another mac was named and similar location to him named and dismissed. Point is this? Why? And why are ppl running scared of this family so much. Do they own the planet or something? Oh wait.. They are builders…
LikeLike
Tom Pride said:
There are definitely a few David Roses who are not all the same, as you say.
Funny you mention the fake blogger who also used the same name ‘David Rose’. Could ‘David Rose’ be a kind of ‘in-joke’ meaning hidden or fake story? ‘Sub Rosa’?
Just a thought.
LikeLike
bobchewie said:
Yes but what is the deal with the mac family. An industrialist, a rap singer and others that have made them a ‘special ‘ lot . And anything said about them must be shot down in flames. Was the journo here a mate of jonathan king as is suggested? Again whats the deal with the mac family? Or is it anyone further up the food chain ie establishment? Are some business deals gonna be affected? There usually is.
LikeLike
bobchewie said:
And you can forget this ‘bloodlust’ or ‘frenzy’ stuff. Theres serious stuff going on. What was going on whilst this story being talked about? Oh the NHS being totally privatised by secret commitees etc. so no worries there. Remember the art of distraction.
LikeLike
Harry said:
Yes, just had two year battle in the high court. Psychoshrink had case dismissed and ended up £20,000 poorer. So small victories are being had. Details http://www.shrink4men.tk
LikeLike
bobchewie said:
Whats that phrase applied to ‘benefit scroungers’ ” if you have nothing to hide you have nothing to fear” irony abounds.
LikeLike
ianbone said:
Cheers Tom – where was that the then? For any doubters David Rose was brilliantly taken apart by Nick Davies in his book ‘Flat Earth News’
LikeLike
Scarlet Wilde said:
David Rose on “The Daily Maul” is, as you say, the anti global warming/whatever else my masters pay me to say ex Vanity Fair hack and freelance muck spreader for past 15 years.
LikeLike
bobchewie said:
What was rose doing on a commitee? Abyway his slurs went down like a lead balloon on the daily fail article judging by the comments.
LikeLike
Tom Pride said:
Ian – I was involved in the making of ‘better dead than wed’. Long time ago now.
LikeLike
unlimitednow said:
Wonderful research I found you through Justice Denied Blog and I am really glad I did
LikeLike
bobchewie said:
Tory calls abuse victim a ‘weirdo’ http://www.metro.co.uk/news/917590-david-mellor-slammed-over-abuse-victim-steven-messham-weirdo-attack
LikeLike
bobchewie said:
Tory calls abuse victim a ‘weirdo’ http://www.metro.co.uk/news/917590-david-mellor-slammed-over-abuse-victim-steven-messham-weirdo-attack
LikeLike
bobchewie said:
Tory MP calls abuse victim a ‘weirdo’ http://www.metro.co.uk/news/917590-david-mellor-slammed-over-abuse-victim-steven-messham-weirdo-attack
LikeLike
bobchewie said:
Mellor in dock over ‘weirdo’ jibe at abuse victim David Mellor Calls Steve Messham ‘A Weirdo’ On Sunday Politics http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2012/11/11/david-mellor-steve-messham-weirdo-andrew-neil-_n_2113549.html via @huffingtonpost
LikeLike
bobchewie said:
David Mellor Calls Steve Messham ‘A Weirdo’ On Sunday Politics http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2012/11/11/david-mellor-steve-messham-weirdo-andrew-neil-_n_2113549.html via @huffingtonpost
LikeLike
bobchewie said:
I am so angry right now after that faily mail shit and the mellor thing. Got messages from mr messham . That poor man is gling through fucking hell right now its painful to read. I hope those bastards will hang there head in dhame
LikeLike
bobchewie said:
Why didnt andrew mcneil rebuke mellor for that ‘weirdo’ remark? Just carried on without batting an eyelid? Mr messham is going through hell at the moment .. Painful it is. Bastards the whole item was bbc bashing and in some cases labour bashing too. Tom watson who got the original allegations got a bashing from mc neil too. He sent his findings to police which is what he should have done , whats his position in the labour party got to do with it? Ffs…
LikeLike
Ghosts said:
I think XXXXXX is hiding something and is probably a XXXXXX and I don’t care whether I get sued for it! Thoughts are not crimes yet are they? Interesting ‘art and antiques’ he collects – and his little B&B ‘secluded retreat’ for the wealthy is surreal in the context of all the rumours – a converted convent, with no TV’s and complete isolation at 300+ quid a night? Some of the ‘reviews’ are quite revealing.
LikeLike
bobchewie said:
@ghosts what you make pf this mellor remark? Why didnt mcneil tell him off. And why attack tom watson on tv cos of his position in party?? Whats that about? TW took his findings to police like he should have done. Whats wrong with that? That whole item stunk..,
LikeLike
bobchewie said:
@ghosts i think lord mac is member of that funny club that mixes with spooks too. Might explain some of the latest shit thats been happening…
LikeLike
Tom Pride said:
Ghosts – thoughts aren’t crimes yet but written comments which annoy the rich and mighty with bagloads of money to throw at lawyers might be. Sorry – I’ve had to redact the name.
LikeLike
bobchewie said:
Tom ive tweeted you stuff from mr messham and its painful to read. Why didnt mcneil tebuke mellor with that disgusting remark out mr messham. All i hear is mud slinging against against labour and bbc….
LikeLike
bobchewie said:
Tom you redact the name whilst mr messham suffers at the moment… Why the frick os everyone scared of this c…… ???
LikeLike
bobchewie said:
Tom … I wish you would pay attention i really eish you would… That man could be under threat at the moment..,,ffs !!!
LikeLike
bobchewie said:
Jeez tom… Ffs steve is going thru hell…,
LikeLike
bobchewie said:
@Ghosts u have no idea what mr messham is going through whilst everyone wets their pants cos of some rich prick..,and discredited MPs call an abuse victim disgusting names.. And moan about the severance pay of some bod at BBC …
LikeLike
J. Daley said:
what rubbish. Are you seriously trying to tell us that Meesham , after all this time, after setting up a ‘child abuse charity’ from which large amounts of money disappeared, after being involved with self appointed experts, could not identify his alleged attacker himself?.
Meesham knew what he was doing- ti wasn;t a mistake. He set out to destroy (and probably has) a totally innocent ,man.
LikeLike
bobchewie said:
Steve M hasnt been heard for two hours now. Hope he is ok
LikeLike
bobchewie said:
U t talking bollocks and u know it.
LikeLike
bobchewie said:
I found a link to rose thing but when i went to it i found msg was ‘locked’ why ? Anyonr know ?
LikeLike
bobchewie said:
Why is link to rose expose locked?
LikeLike
Tom Pride said:
No. In the early 1990s, he was shown a picture of his attacker which he identified correctly. The police told him it was Lord McAlpine which it wasn’t.
Not surprising his attacker didn’t introduce himself formally and tell him his exact name while he was raping him.
LikeLike
Pingback: That furious pitter-patter of guilt-ridden establishment brogues » 21stCenturyFix.org.uk
cherrie3 said:
It it seems there may be more than one journalist called David Rose. And some people in the industry are not even all that sure whether David Rose actually even exists at all.
LikeLike
bobchewie said:
Steven was freed of the fraud stuff used against him. Nearly lost his home too.
LikeLike
bobchewie said:
I came across a link to something that clsimed to expose david rose.. Tom found it had been deleted.. Weird.
LikeLike
John Aspray said:
‘A rose by any other name would smell as sweet’.
Meaning
What matters is what something is, not what it is called.
Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet, 1600
LikeLike
JG said:
If I hear the phrase “Wrongfully Accused” just one more fucking time I’ll explode!
You just have to look at David Mellor to know that if you’re on the same side as him, you’re on the wrong side.
LikeLike
Harry said:
David Rose is a former member of MI5.
http://hat4uk.wordpress.com/2012/11/12/exclusive-steve-messham-missing-for-eight-hours/
LikeLike
incubusblog said:
Yep, the police gave him the name, and you can see where the confusion might arise given the family resemblance-
LikeLike
Mr Mossad , said:
WELL FOUND REAL ZOOMY
has Kennith Clark got an issue BTW?
LikeLike
Pingback: Cameron orders investigation into abuse of top Tories by sinister rings of child abuse victims « Pride's Purge
Pingback: Makt, degenerering, pedofili | christalbum
David Mccann said:
Purely done to debase and descredit other witnesses, – “If Messham can be mistaken, then so can so and so…” Mental ill people haven’t a chance to be heard or believed, and why they are also picked. – It’s probably the case Messham has been threatened, as how can you make such a mistake about the person whose buggered you?
LikeLike
bobchewie said:
you can if the person is a big corp bod with contact in high places and are mates with spooks..
LikeLike
David Mccann said:
Without doubt, it is through fear and initimadation why and how so many continue to abuse and continue to get away with it!!
LikeLike
bobchewie said:
its the nature of power itself..
LikeLike
bobchewie said:
what with rose being an mi5 bod and them spying on actitivists it makes you wonder..
LikeLike
maddsuspicions said:
Just did a quick Google search and this was a top result, there was a David Rose who went in front of a home affairs parliamentary committee on the subject of child abuse back in 2002 http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200102/cmselect/cmhaff/836/2051402.htm alongside people called Bob Woffinden and Richard Webster, if you’ve heard of them?
Sorry not got a clue about the context of this committee just from a quick search
LikeLike
David Mccann said:
With virtually all those involved being members of the very same secret societies, – this is the ‘real’ reason there are foot soldiers out there to help undermind whatever scandals arise that might involve one of ‘their own’ This is an extract from Stephen Knight’s book; The Brotherhood, it gives clear evidence as to how the judicial system close ranks and why anyone unfortunate enough to cross their paths are up against it and need our help; – Christopher, a senior Whitehall Civil Servant and Freemason explained that Masonry’s nationwide organisation of men from most walks of life provided one of the most efficient private intelligence networks ever imaginable. Private information on anybody in the country could normally be accessed very rapidly through endless permutations of Masonic contacts – police, magistrates, solicitors, bank managers, Post Office staff, [very useful in supplying copies of a man’s mail, and especially if you say the “target” is a sex offender – Julian Assange comes to mind [1]], doctors, government employee, bosses of firms and nationalised industries etc., and a dossier of personal data could be built up on anybody very quickly.
When the major facts of an individual’s life were known, areas of vulnerability would become apparent. Perhaps he is in financial difficulties; perhaps he has some social vice – if married he might retain a mistress or have proclivity for visiting prostitutes; perhaps there is something in his past he wishes keep buried, some guilty secret, a criminal offence [easily obtainable through Freemason police of doubtful virtue], or other blemish on his character: all these and more could be discovered via the wide-ranging Masons network of 600,000 contacts [2] [this number has perhaps increased by at least a third since this article was originally written in 1984, though it’s normally accepted by the UGLE that there are 400,000 members in the UK, though as I say, I believe the figure to be much higher. Perhaps Knight was also referring to other Freemasons further abroad, or other affiliations such as the Rotarians, Odd Fellows etc.], a great many of whom were disposed to do favours for one another because that had been their prime motives for joining.
Even decent Masons could often be conned into providing information on the basis that: “Brother Smith needs this to help the person involved”. The adversary would even sometimes be described as a fellow Mason to the Brother from whom information was sought perhaps someone with access to his bank manager or employer. The good Mason would not go to the lengths of checking with Freemasons Hall whether or not this was so. The “target” was presented as a “Brother” in distress by a fellow Freemason, especially a fellow Lodge member that would be enough for any upright member of the Craft. Sometimes this information gathering process – often involving a long chain of Masonic contacts all over the country and possibly abroad – would be unnecessary. Enough would be known in advance about the adversary to initiate any desired action against him. I asked how this action might be taken. “Solicitors are very good at it” said Christopher. “Get your man involved in something legal – it need not be serious – and you have him”. Solicitors, I was told, are past masters at causing endless delays, generating useless paperwork, ignoring instructions, running up immense bills, misleading clients into taking decisions damaging to themselves, [and this I can vouch for, and one of the reasons I dislike and don’t trust many people of the so called ‘legal fraternity’], Masonic police can harass, arrest on false charges, and plant evidence. “A businessman in a small community or person in public office arrested for dealing in child pornography, for indecent exposure, or for trafficking in drugs is at the end of the line”, said Christopher. “He will never work again. Some people have committed suicide after experiences of that kind”.
Freemason’s can bring about the situation where credit companies and banks withdraw credit facilities from individual clients and tradesmen, said my informant. Bank can foreclose. People who rely on the telephone for their work can be cut off for long periods. Masonic employees of local authorities can arrange for a person’s drains to be inspected and extensive damage to be reported, thus burdening the person with huge repair bills; workmen carrying out the job can find – in reality cause – further damage. Again with regard to legal matters, a fair hearing is hard to get when a man in ordinary circumstances is in financial difficulties. If he is trying to fight a group of unprincipled Freemasons skilled in using the ‘network’ it will be impossible because “Masonic Department of Health and Social Security and Law Society officials can delay applications for Legal Aid endlessly. [3] Employers, if they are Freemasons or not can be given private information about a man who has made himself an enemy of Masonry. At worst he will be dismissed or consistently passed over for promotion”. Christopher added.
“Masonic doctors can also be used. But for some reason doctors seem to be the least corruptible men. Only the fighters have any hope of beating the system once it’s at work against them”, he told me. “Most people, fighters or not, are beaten in the end, though. It’s . . . you see, I … you finish up not knowing who you can trust. You can get no help because your story sounds so paranoid that you are thought a crank, one of those nuts who think the whole world is a conspiracy against them. It is a strange phenomenon. By setting up a situation that most people will think of as fantasy, these people can poison every part of a person’s life. If they give in they go under. If they don’t give in its only putting off the day because if they fight, so much unhappiness will be brought to the people around them that there will likely come a time when even their families turn against them out of desperation. When that happens and they are without friends wherever they look, they become easy meat. The newspapers will not touch them. – There is no defence against an evil which only the victims and the perpetrators know exists”. Christopher – Senior Whitehall Civil Servant and Freemason – Quoted in Stephen Knight’s book: The Brotherhood, 1984.
[1] a href=”http://www.deathandtaxesmag.com/39211/julian-assange-believes-western-free-speech-is-illusory/%3E”>http://www.deathandtaxesmag.com/39211/julian-assange-believes-weste…;. D.McCann
[2] “Freemasons – The silent destroyers. Deist religious cult a href=”http://www.bilderberg.org/masons.htm%3E”>http://www.bilderberg.org/masons.htm>;.
[3] “Gang Stalking World – A world where we all come together.” a href=”http://www.gangstalkingworld.com/Social/reviews.php?op=showcontent&id=7%3E”>http://www.gangstalkingworld.com/Social/reviews.php?op=showcontent&…;.
LikeLike
bobchewie said:
Hague,said in 1996 a inquiry into abuse in N W kids homes, said it was “saddest chapters” & “no cover up”. “senior figure” 2 look into it. so what happend?
LikeLike
bobchewie said:
wolfit or webster is a mate of jonathan king..and are connected to ‘false memory soceity’ cameron was on that panel david rose is mi5 bod…its a whitewak ops thing to dscredit anyone who accuses establishment basically
LikeLike
David Mccann said:
As said above, writer of the ‘Jack of Kent’ wrote: ‘Who is David Rose?’ in 2011: http://jackofkent.blogspot.co.uk/2011/07/who-is-david-rose.html
LikeLike
bobchewie said:
FFS The security services spy on disabled protestors !! they all swim in same pools who accuse abuse victims..busines, establishment line of defence is to attack
LikeLike
bobchewie said:
rose is an ex mi5 bod..its been noted already
LikeLike
bobchewie said:
@david scott..check out the carlton club thats where all the dirty deeds are done behind the scenes
LikeLike
bobchewie said:
@david mcann sorry,,
LikeLike
bobchewie said:
William Hague, the then Secretary of State for Wales, announced in 1996 a judicial inquiry into abuse in North Wales children’s homes, he described it as one of the “saddest chapters” in the history of social care and insisted there would be “no cover up”. Yet it was. He announced that a “senior figure” would investigate “truly dreadful” child abuse claims some of which involved a senior Tory figure who was prominent under the Thatcher regime. But he didn’t.
LikeLike
bobchewie said:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/9657036/How-Tory-paedophile-claims-were-covered-up.html
LikeLike
bobchewie said:
NEVERMIND EH? “Business is looking up” quote from boss of company that spies on disability groups…http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2001/oct/31/september11.media
LikeLike
Pingback: Steven Messham is not just a child abuse victim. He’s a hero. « Pride's Purge
Pingback: The Death of Satire? The Mail’s David Rose complains about being smeared « Pride's Purge
tony roma said:
mr pide this is your 2nd david rose seace and dissist anonce ment.
these last few weeks have been a living waking horror for my cleeunt and frend david rammer rose.
suicide has been mentioned as an option butt i say david youmust stand erect and turgid and strong or no payday awayday.
we cannot sue if you snuff it init.
rock hard manleyness is required bulldog spirit wot wot thats my dave.
leave the flacid limp weakness for twitterroist bloggererors.
my fend and clleunt david has more spunk and juice than any man eye know.
and as phillip marlowe once said to lizabethan queen elisabeth the 1st.
“Quod me nutrit, me destruit” the jewish translation is
ohhvay what kills me makes me stronger init and that is davids life motto.
and so mr pide this hounding of innocent men must stop.
it is time for david to take his white lodge glooves off and get ready for a bloody fight.
to the nut job bloggers who commented that my clie unt has attended eyes wide shut parties.
that is false.
the suggestion that mr rose was smeared in waste excrement from a popular boy band and that he was the victim of an 8 hour ding batting episode that left him
shit faced and twattered for 2 hole days is also a filthy anti semenetic lie.
david arronovitch dobieitch and melanee phillips,martin a miss and lord george monbiot and many other common purpose mi5 assets are fully behind david rose at this sad time.
not just watching his back but working his front as well.
mr pide please contact are office to work out the on the spot fine fees for bismirsch ching honor rabble men.
sorry about the poor quality of the writing but i am drunk and will soon need help with the toillette.
lucky for me, the athenium club has the most helpful young male helpers although last week one of the blighters did spill some of my urine on my trousers.
he tried to put it away before i had finished damn fool.
LikeLike
bobchewie said:
Did david mention ‘class war’ and what happened with all that? And that business to do with blacklists years ago..
LikeLike
bobchewie said:
People who worked in the construction industry who reported health abd safety breaches were fitted up and reported as being something akin to enemy of the state , maybe a trained KGB agent , that was the state of delusion in the estaishment , the reality was that if skip health and safety you can get the job done quicker. So what if someone falls to their death from a building site. What for me it shows is that large corporations with vested interest will use the services of secret agencies. And in doing so will hide and obscure any misdeeds on their part.
LikeLike
Pingback: Daily Mail Journo David Rose Called Out As Elite ‘Fixer’ | ukgovernmentwatch
Pingback: An APOLOGY to The Daily Mail from TOM PRIDE « Pride's Purge
Pingback: How did Cyril Smith get away with paedophilia? By threatening tweeters and bloggers with libel! « Pride's Purge
Pingback: Justice? McAlpine gets hundreds of thousands in compensation while child victims get next to nothing « Pride's Purge
Pingback: What’s the bad link between the Hillsborough and child abuse scandals? Royal and Sun Alliance! « Pride's Purge
Pingback: Senior Tory accused of abusing millions of children « Pride's Purge
Pingback: McAlpine to sue 9,990,000 UK Twitter users for not mistakenly naming him as paedophile « Pride's Purge
Pingback: Real men prefer women (or men) not girls (or boys) « Pride's Purge
Pingback: Are McAlpine’s lawyers breaking the solicitors’ code of practice? « Pride's Purge
Pingback: Daily Mail ‘fixer’ David Rose defends paedophilia accused and attacks child abuse victims. Again. « Pride's Purge
Pingback: Savile wasn’t ‘hiding in plain sight’. It was a cover-up. « Pride's Purge
Pingback: How Lord McAlpine is exploiting exactly the same libel laws that Savile used to cover up his crimes « Pride's Purge
Pingback: Jimmy Savile, West Yorkshire Police and the Friday Morning Club « Pride's Purge
Pingback: No link at all between police, paedophilia, plebs and politicians. Probably. « Pride's Purge
Pingback: If UKIP is so bloody libertarian – why has it said nothing against secret courts? « Pride's Purge
bobchewie said:
@moran wordpress blogs are sometimes chaotic ..the void’ is an example , you cant work out who you are replying to
LikeLike
Pingback: Cock-up, cover-up or conspiracy in the North Wales child abuse scandal? You decide. | Pride's Purge
Mike said:
Former Conservative Councillor Malcolm Johnson who is co-ordinator of the Association Of Child Abuse Lawyers disgusted viewers on Newsnight last year when he objected to any further inquiry into the abuse. His old firm folded up after he had to pay out compensation for the distress caused by his service in respect of child abuse litigation but he has managed to get employed at Blake Lapthorn Solicitors. Why did this ex Tory Councillor not want this sickening abuse investigated?
LikeLike
Pingback: How I got caught up in a cyberwar over victims of child sexual abuse | Pride's Purge
Pingback: Something odd in the McAlpine v Bercow case – is legal precedent being ignored? | Pride's Purge
Pingback: State of civil liberties in the UK – call an MP a coward and face jail | Pride's Purge
Pingback: No blurred lines – Eddy Shah and co are excusing paedophilia | Pride's Purge
Pingback: Jimmy Savile to be canonised after how he got away with it for so long confirmed a miracle | Pride's Purge
Pingback: Here are 5 questions MPs should ask the heads of MI5, MI6 and GCHQ today | Pride's Purge
Pingback: Warning – sharing this blogpost (in the UK) might be libellous | Pride's Purge
Pingback: Lord McAlpine in his own damning words – The New Machiavelli? | Pride's Purge
Pingback: Lord Rennard on Cyril Smith: “a personal inspiration to me” | Pride's Purge
Pingback: REVEALED! Massive 20-year conspiracy to deprive Lib Dem peer of party membership | Pride's Purge
Pingback: Jack Straw on child abuse: “The terms of the agreement did not include an apology” | Pride's Purge
Pingback: The truth about the Tory Party’s cover up of its links to paedophilia | Pride's Purge
Pingback: Google searches for ‘Leon Brittan’ and ‘PIE’ censored after Cease and Desist notice | Pride's Purge
Pingback: FW: [New p ost] Googl e searches for ‘Leon Brittan’ and ‘PIE’ censored a fter Cease and Desis t notice – annette rose smith |
Pingback: Tory Party admits it ‘mislaid’ Leon Brittan somewhere in the House of Lords | Pride's Purge
Pingback: Meet the man Leon Brittan handed the lost VIP paedophile dossier to | Pride's Purge
Pingback: Danger of sewage hitting air conditioning unit delays Westminster VIP paedophile probe | Pride's Purge
Pingback: Tony Blair on dealing with the developing VIP paedophile crisis: “Carpet bomb it” | Pride's Purge
Pingback: Awkward. Butler-Sloss once said leaders have “sovereign” right to immunity and anonymity | Pride's Purge
Pingback: 8 powerful reasons why Butler-Sloss cannot head the VIP child abuse inquiry | Pride's Purge
Pingback: 8 powerful reasons why Butler-Sloss cannot head the VIP child abuse inquiry | Pride's Purge
Pingback: C of E publishes critical child abuse report – 10 years too late! | Pride's Purge
Pingback: EXCLUSIVE: Shock as Jimmy Savile revealed to have been a northerner | Pride's Purge