(not satire – it’s the UK today!)
Eight months before a general election, an unpopular Tory government – supported by a rabidly jingoistic right-wing press – is taking us to war.
Sound familiar?
It should:
.
Related articles by Tom Pride:
Cameron to recall parliament to decide which side to bomb in Syria
BBC reporter caught red-handed manipulating video in Scottish indy campaign
US launches air strikes against IKEA
Syria Attack Attacked After Syrian Attack on Syrians Attacked
6 embarrassing links between Syria’s President Assad and Britain
.
Please feel free to comment. And share. Thanks:
Oppressed said:
Stick Cameron on horseback, give him a sword & send him in!
LikeLiked by 1 person
FinkFurst said:
True, except that the idiot Cameron has chosen a war which can’t possibly be ‘won’. However, it is one where the government can try to claim success with grossly exaggerated numbers of ‘militants’ killed, and grossly underestimated numbers of civilians killed.
Sadly the lot of ordinary people in Iraq and Syria will once again remain unchanged after spending yet more billions of dollars on destroying things. The US even proudly announced destroying several oil refineries today. The Syrian people need those oil refineries in the future.
Here’s a prediction – UK ground troops will be sent in, but only after the election, and this will happen irrespective of whether Labour or Tory wins that election.
And Tom, you forgot to mention the support also of the rabidly jingoistic right-wing Labour party leadership.
LikeLike
buddyhell said:
Reblogged this on Guy Debord's Cat and commented:
Cameron wants his Falklands moment. There is no way they can win next year’s general election without it… well, that and spreading fear about how this country faces a huge threat from “Islamic terror” (sic).
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
Errmmm… but the Tories and Labour are in complete agreement to attack Iraq (and probably also Syria), so how can it possibly affect the next general election?
LikeLike
Mervyn Hyde (@mjh0421) said:
We created this whole mess by following the American Government, they are trying to involve us again, they wanted it, they should solve it. Not us.
LikeLike
kenord said:
If Camoron gets elected next year again he will cause a war here.So he might as well get some practice.
LikeLiked by 1 person
overburdenddonkey said:
Click to access Militarisation-briefing-web.pdf
Militarism is ever-present in British society.
Soldiers have always marched at state events;
cadet forces are part of state and private
schools; armed forces recruiting offices can
be found in many town centres. Successive
governments have been under constant pressure
from arms manufacturers to buy more weapons.
But there is a new and different tide of
militarisation that has developed over the last
five years. The general public do not seem to
be aware of it, and it is not being discussed or
scrutinised. In this briefing I will show that there
is a coherent government strategy behind this
tide, which is aimed at increasing support for the
military.
LikeLike
Rachel said:
I see Cameron waited until after the Scottish Referendum before recalling parliament. Got to think the Coalition decided it might go down like a lead balloon with Scottish people, swinging the vote to Yes.
LikeLiked by 1 person
FinkFurst said:
Absolutely right. Westminster starting ANOTHER unwinnable war would almost certainly have tipped the referendum over to Yes. Of course some Scottish voters already knew that both Tory and Labour leaderships were keen to start bombing, but still the reality would have made a large difference.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
A curious point…… Why have we seen NO opinion polls about starting another war in Iraq (or Syria)? A couple of weeks ago we could barely move for opinion polls!
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
Tom – You say you’re a bit of a poll geek. What do you think is the reason?
LikeLike
Tom Pride said:
Here’s one:
http://yougov.co.uk/news/2014/09/17/now-majority-also-support-raf-air-strikes-syria/
LikeLike
Tom Pride said:
Well, I don’t think Ed Miliband being against war in Syria is particularly jingoistic. And he’s risking losing votes over it:
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
They are ALL (at the moment) saying they won’t attack Syria, so that means nothing… and Miliband forgetting to tell the Sun that he supports Help For Heroes wouldn’t be out of character!
I think that in the jingoism stakes it’s pretty much neck and neck between the three main Westminster parties. Got anything else?
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
Thanks, I missed that one. It seems that it was pushed out of the headlines by the Scottish referendum. The problem with that poll is that it doesn’t mention bombing Iraq, only Syria, which of course would currently be illegal.
LikeLike
Nick said:
Cameron will end up the same as Blair with a Humanitarian award instead of Blair’s Philanthropist next year you mark my word
LikeLike
chirs said:
yet public opinion on wars is still at a all time low and much of this militarisation is failing to change public opinion to support wars
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
OBD – Have you got anything to say in your own words, rather than just copying and pasting? I know you have valid opinions of your own……
LikeLike
Boldfield said:
I see the tories can find the billions for a war but not for the NHS and other social services.
LikeLike
penniewoodfall said:
I guess FF that applies to me tooooo 😦
World War III: Pillage and plunder http://wp.me/p14nw1-10q via @wordpressdotcom
to be continued……..
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
… just like Labour in 2003 then!
LikeLike
Mark-My-Wordz said:
Is Miliband now Cameron’s poodle?
LikeLike