Tags
(not satire – it’s the UK today!)
Earlier this year, the coalition government announced an average increase of 0%-1% in pay for doctors, nurses and other public sector workers:
Pay decisions announced for NHS staff and other public sector workers
While at the same time, giving themselves a 10% pay rise:
As you can see, the police get zilch.
Punishment for plebgate?
.
Feel free to comment. And share. Thanks:
thelovelywibblywobblyoldlady said:
The tories couldn’t care less about teachers and nurses not getting a decent pay rise because they can afford private healthcare and education. They need the police on side however, to implement and mete out their heavy handed treatment of peaceful protesters. Lets hope the police en masse vote Labour at the next election and get these unelected scumbags out of office!
LikeLiked by 1 person
sdbast said:
Reblogged this on sdbast.
LikeLike
And I'll Remember said:
Reblogged this on And I'll Remember and commented:
There are no words…oh! yes there are! The powers that be are ‘A Shower of Shit’.
LikeLiked by 1 person
chunkyfunkymunky said:
Reblogged this on chunkyfunkymunky.
LikeLike
DwayneDwee said:
Selfish MP’s have always looked after themselves
“The Police get Zilch” …………not getting a pay rise now gives our, in the main, violent Police Officers yet another reason to claim compensation!
http://www.hrgrapevine.com/markets/hr/article/2014-03-10-police-officers-claim-85million-in-work-accident-compensation#.VA1448JdXgQ
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
Tom – You say “it’s the UK today!”, so perhaps for the sake of completeness you might also mention the 2014 pay rise for Members of the Scottish Parliament… ?
LikeLike
prayerwarriorpsychicnot said:
Zero pay for police could be anticipatory conditioning to get your own wages after the fashion of USA police.
LikeLike
prayerwarriorpsychicnot said:
Reblogged this on Citizens, not serfs.
LikeLike
nuggy said:
i agree with the police getting nothing there already paid more than everyone else in the public secter.
LikeLiked by 1 person
annak53 said:
And they say there’s no money to pay us our State Pensions that we’ve been robbed of with the increased state pension age!
MP’s have also been given 10 years transitional protection to the changes made to their occupational pension whilst we mere mortals received as little a 18 months notice of the changes to the state pension law. Hypocrites. Please sign and share if you’ve had enough. http://you.38degrees.org.uk/p/statepensionlaw
LikeLiked by 1 person
A6er said:
Reblogged this on Britain Isn't Eating.
LikeLike
truthaholics said:
Reblogged this on | truthaholics.
LikeLike
guy fawkes said:
Pensioners also have to wait longer to get their bus pass now also!
LikeLike
guy fawkes said:
Due to the free school meals for all children, my daughter can afford a new car, but I have to wait another 5 years for a bus pass.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
I don’t think buying new cars was the reason for providing free school meals to those in need. That kind of attitude doesn’t surprise me any more, but being so blatant about it is a sad reflection on society.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
1%
LikeLike
sandra bowes-rennox said:
give me a break…what shit thought this a good idea….how sad is this….just how hard are the parties trying to fight this…well not hard enough….if you born with the silver spoon in the mouth….then this moron who thought this is right has his head well and truly up his arse….i doubt those such as the scumbag Duncan smith is about to turn down such a hike in pay….its easy to look down on those who live in the real world when scum such as Smith and Cameron live in there ivory towers….the more they have the more they want….oh its time they went…roll on 2015….THE FIGHT GOES ON….regards sandra.
LikeLiked by 1 person
guy fawkes said:
The fact that she did not need a handout in the form of free school meals as both her and her husband are working and can afford foreign holidays etc.
Some older people cannot afford a bus ride into town,due to the cost of increased fares and decreasing benefits and pensions.
LikeLike
Pingback: MPs get a 10% pay rise, nurses and teachers get...
overburdenddonkey said:
ot
Yes campaign draw level in poll from traditionally No-friendly firm TNS-BMRB
New TNS poll Yes 50% (+8) No 50% (-8)
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
I think if a family is reasonably well off then rather than treating themselves to a new car, they should make a contribution to the school or to a suitable charity, equivalent to the value of the free meals their children are receiving.
Your daughter is a pensioner with a young child at school???
LikeLike
guy fawkes said:
Your daughter is a pensioner with a young child at school??? You love to antagonize!
My daughter is a young mother with a husband and two children who did not need to be given free school meals.
Who the hell other than the arse crawling champion of the middleclass Nick Clegg, would think that these people needed free school meals in the first place, perhaps he was compensating those that had lost their child benefit if earning over 50k?
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
“did not need to be given free school meals”… but chose to buy a new car with the resulting savings anyway. Fair enough, there’s nothing (except a sense of social responsibility) preventing such people from exploiting the system. Obviously Thatcherism is still alive and well!
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
Take what you can, and give only what you have to. Is that your philosophy?
LikeLike
guy fawkes said:
‘Take only what you need’ would be a better motto!
LikeLike
guy fawkes said:
ps If you read my posts you would see that I am opposing greed, you are supporting it, but greed becomes you it goes with your other flawed attributes.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
“Due to the free school meals for all children, my daughter can afford a new car”
“My daughter is a young mother with a husband and two children who did not need to be given free school meals”
Q.E.D.
LikeLike
guy fawkes said:
I’m sure you just like to argue. Those that were in need of free school meals were and still should be receiving them, those that are not in need of them should not be receiving them.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
“those that are not in need of them should not be receiving them”
… or buying a new car with the savings!!!
LikeLike
guy fawkes said:
Agreed – or should that be a greed 🙂
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
Errrmmm…… so why did to tell everybody that your daughter was able to buy a new car due to the provision of free school meals?
If you want to criticise your own family then I would suggest that it’s better to talk to them directly rather than do it on a public blog!
LikeLike
guy fawkes said:
My daughter was the only example I could give and my daughter knows when it comes to being honest I make no exceptions, that is hypocrisy or nepotism, take your pick?
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
It’s VERY weird to accuse your own daughter of greed on a public blog, but it’s your family so it’s entirely up to you!
LikeLike
guy fawkes said:
If the cap fits whoever it is I think they should wear it, but you obviously think there should be exceptions regarding this situation.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
Yes, if one has a criticism of a member of one’s own family, then it should be made face to face. To do it on an anonymous blog is cowardly and distinctly bizarre.
LikeLike
guy fawkes said:
According to the laws of Fink everything is cowardly and bizarre, but my family know how i feel on these issues and I have no problem with face to face criticism, I have given it to my children all of their lives as well as praise.
It is obvious you have no children because you seem to think criticizing them or trying to teach them right from wrong is bizarre.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
I think criticising one’s children or other family members should never be done in public, and certainly not in the most public and permanent way imaginable! You obviously think differently. Thank goodness you’re not a member of my family.
LikeLike
guy fawkes said:
Thank goodness I am not a member of your family indeed.
You forget the copious amount of times you have tried to convince me that this is not a public forum now you are saying that it is, make up your mind. Nevertheless it does not change the fact that I am not a hypocrite like you and believe that everybody should be treated equally.
Everyone has a right to reply providing it is truthful.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
1) I think you’re getting rather confused between the concepts of “public” and “anonymous”.
2) I do NOT think everybody should be treated equally. I don’t treat members of my family as if they are strangers. It’s sad that you do.
3) I partly agree with your last sentence. Everybody has a right to reply, but they have a right to lie too – but they may be judged accordingly.
LikeLike
guy fawkes said:
Why is it sad that I treat members of my family as I would treat strangers, especially when it comes to rights, justice, fairness etc., which you champion so vociferously, or is it only everyone other than your family you like to criticize?
I am not confused between public and anonymous especially as members of the public know the face behind my pseudonym as do my family. Do you see any objection from them?
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
If you treat your family as if they’re strangers then that’s of course up to you. I try to protect and help my family in a very different way than I would with strangers. Almost every human being on the planet does……
LikeLike
guy fawkes said:
That’s why we are in the mess we are in nepotism, elitism,favouritism, nimbyism the list goes on!
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
You are either deluding yourself, a liar, or the weirdest person I’ve ever conversed with. Would you give your kidney to a stranger just as willingly as to your own child or partner?
LikeLike
guy fawkes said:
The only deluded person is you if you think you are a fair and just person, I am sure your family have had to make plenty of allowances for your attitude, beliefs and behaviour if they are as loyal as you purport to be.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
Would you give your kidney to a stranger just as willingly as to your own child or partner?
LikeLike
guy fawkes said:
As your question is purely hypothetical based on compatability of donor and recipient, I would hypothetically say I prefer to keep both of mine.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
Most people (including me) would have no problem whatsoever in answering “No”. I think that makes you a liar when you say “I treat members of my family as I would treat strangers”.
LikeLike
guy fawkes said:
I suppose you are saving yours on the off chance your family might need one.
To you I would give a stake not a kidney.
LikeLike
guy fawkes said:
Children have to learn they can’t have everything in life, free school meals and a free kidney.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
You made your kids pay for their school meals? That’s harsh! Did you send them up chimneys to earn the money?
LikeLike
guy fawkes said:
No! but I’m hoping one of them will come down my chimney with a sack full of their free school dinner money for me this year.
This is becoming surreal, a bit like a Pete and Dudley sketch, I’m the peat that fuels the debate and you are the dud (as usual)!
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
To answer your question – I would NEVER slag my daughter off on a public web site. That’s sad, but not for you.
LikeLike
guy fawkes' husband said:
http://www.johnderbyshire.com/Readings/cuntsketch.html
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
Yes Ms Fawkes, I’ve heard that sketch many times. I had the record. (Yawn)…… Only repressed people are shocked by words like “cunt” any more. That’s sad too.
P.S. Why did you waste your time setting up a new logon pretending to be your husband?
LikeLike
guy fawkes' husband said:
My husband was the man dud met. Repressed that will be the day!
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
HA HA HA HA HA!!!! You haven’t even noticed that you just proved yourself to be a complete liar!!!
LikeLike
guy fawkes' husband said:
My husband was sat next to me while on his elevenses and typed his reply, he has just rushed back to work.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
Your husband typed “My husband was the man dud met”??? HA HA HA HA HA HA!!!
Keep on digging you moron……
LikeLike
mike moreton said:
Like too know where you can buy a new car for the monthly cost of a couple of school meals!
LikeLike
guy fawkes said:
So we share a computer, except I know more about them than him but I forgot to take his name off the end.
I will keep digging so long as I can dig at you!
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
The average school meal costs £437 per child per year (www.gov.uk/government/news/nick-clegg-announces-funding-details-for-free-school-meals). If you have two children receiving free meals then you can lease or buy a new car for that amount.
…and some people think that’s the right thing to do.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
LIAR!!! – Your husband didn’t type anything at all. If you are not a liar, please tell us exactly which one of the 3 posts above he typed……
LikeLike
guy fawkes said:
He accessed the u tube sketch, then copied and pasted it, he also added husband to my moniker then had to leave, but wanted to tell you what he thought.
I was the one who forgot to change the name back to my own only.
LikeLike
guy fawkes said:
Some people are opportunists when given money they don’t need, the problem lies with the immoral social policy makers and politicians that implemented it.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
I blame the parents……!
LikeLike
guy fawkes said:
I do too – my kids were spoilt though not deprived!
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
So you condemn free meals as an immoral social policy, but you don’t condemn your own parallel domestic policy… or do you?
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
He really wanted to tell me what he thought? I’m so flattered! I say you are a liar and he said absolutely nothing at all. Does he have anything to say about that?
LikeLike
DwayneDwee said:
ff
oooh you are awful, but i like you.
LikeLike
guy fawkes said:
My daughter is just taking what is given to her and is using it for her own purposes i.e. to buy a new car, Clegg and his cronies implemented this policy for their own purposes to buy votes.
I wonder what the other mothers and fathers who don’t need free school meals for their kids are spending it on?
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
So you think that if other people do it then it must be OK? You’re not even capable of recognising a moral social policy!
LikeLike
guy fawkes said:
How and when did I say it was ok? Both those that accept money they don’t need and those that implement such monetary policies are immoral.
LikeLike
guy fawkes said:
ps MP’s salary increases is a point in question.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
Errrr…… so are you saying that your own daughter is immoral?
LikeLike
guy fawkes said:
in this instance yes!
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
…… and she knows that you post on this site as “guy fawkes”?
LikeLike
guy fawkes said:
Yes, but she also knows that she is not one of those that is receiving free school meal money, I was lying just like you do to me.
For those that are getting free school meals that are NOT eligible for them, I would be interested to see how they spend their money, especially since others that are receiving benefits are constantly under scrutiny.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
Ah! So NOW you admit that you are a liar. You might notice that I already said so 5 times in this thread alone!
… and I never lied to you or anybody else on this site.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
P.S. When you tell lies on here in future, please could you add “(THIS IS A LIE”) to your post. It would make it much easier for people to know what you actually mean. Thank you.
LikeLike
guy fawkes said:
You were the one that said it was ok to tell lies. You have lied plenty of times and tried to discredit me with your lies.
I think this lying game is fun, something I am not accustomed to, but am now happy to give you a taste of your own medicine, see how you like it.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
I have never lied to you or anybody else on this site. When do you think I did?
……and it’s only OK to have told lies if you admit to doing so, and apologise. You apparently only think it’s a fun game. You have dismissed morality and social responsibility, and you have extreme bigoted attitudes to sexuality. It seems that Thatcher taught you well.
LikeLike
guy fawkes said:
You never admit to anything so never feel the need to apologize, but you try to get me to apologize for prejudice and bigotry that is in your own tiny mind, not mine.
Thatcherite moi ha! ha!
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
Errrmmm…… you think your bigotry is in MY mind? Tom asked me not to mention again your repeated opinion that all bisexual people are criminals, so I won’t 😉
I note you agree that I never lied.
LikeLike
guy fawkes said:
Where did I say I agree you never lied, infact I said the opposite i.e. you never admit to lying.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
…because I never lied and you therefore can’t find ANYTHING to the contrary. Go on, try again, you sad, stupid, bigoted, homophobic loser, who even publicly accuses her own children of being immoral!
LikeLike
guy fawkes said:
You are so pissed off because I led you up the garden path, ha! ha! ha!
I don’t need to prove you a liar you have done it all by yourself on many occasion.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
You think publicly insulting your own children is funny? I feel so sorry for them.
LikeLike
guy fawkes said:
I don’t think they need your sympathy, they prefer my pranks.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
If you think kids find their parents’ “pranks” funny then either you don’t have any or you don’t talk to them!
LikeLike
guy fawkes said:
We grunt at one another now and then, but I have a very busy family, my grandkids love me taking the p out of their parents.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
You don’t talk to your kids, but you insult them on the internet and take the piss out of them to their children. Yes, that sounds exactly like you!
If one of your grandchildren is bisexual, will you tell them that they deserve to be put in prison for their crime?
LikeLike
guy fawkes said:
Tom, Tom alert, I’m sure you know that Fink is breaking your rules here!
My grandchildren can be what they like and reap the rewards or suffer the consequences accordingly.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
Fortunately in this country they won’t suffer the consequence of being put in prison for their sexuality, but that wasn’t what I asked you. It was – Will you tell them that they deserve to be put in prison for their crime?
LikeLike
guy fawkes said:
You know my reply, so stop repeating yourself Polly.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
No, I don’t know your answer. Are you afraid to say what you really think?
Will you tell your grandchildren that they deserve to be put in prison if they are bisexual? Would it be better or worse if they are homosexual?
LikeLike
guy fawkes said:
Sadly none of them are either.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
…you still can’t answer the question! What are you afraid of?
LikeLiked by 1 person
guy fawkes said:
Since I have answered the question more than 20 times, I’m afraid your compulsive disorder which demands that I answer every question that you ask is wearing a little thin.
DwayneDwoo
Look up past posts and you will find the answer you want on many of them.
LikeLike
DwayneDwoo said:
Guy, no comprende senorita……. am i seeking an answer? an answer to what?
I apologise, but I am genuinely confused by your sentence.
LikeLike
guy fawkes said:
You liked FFs untrue comment that I cannot answer the question and that I am afraid
therefore if you think he’s accusations are correct I was pointing you in the direction that would prove his assertions wrong, but feel free to like his rubbish.
LikeLike
DwayneDwoo said:
Guy, if you deduce all that from a ‘like’ then you are a very paranoid person. If you have any history with FF then i am unaware of it. I must admit that i have found your argument? with FF very amusing, i can see that you are very easily put on the defensive.. so can FF. You need to assertively end this thread and move on……stop thinking about what other people are thinking… because this leaves you open to sharp minds like FF. Don’t take the bait…… OBD took lots of bait before he realised…… aint that right FF?
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
Dwayne – Pretty close, but you’re wrong that I care much about defending what I say. You’ll see that my posts fall mainly into two categories – Attempts at serious political discussion, and less serious discrediting of people with bizarre (and sometimes nasty) views such as Ms Fawkes.
So Ms Fawkes, if you’re not afraid to talk about your view that some normal sexual behaviour should be made a criminal offence, why are you refusing to do so?
LikeLike
guy fawkes said:
If you think bisexuality is normal, it shows how abnormal you are mr Funk.
LikeLike
guy fawkes said:
Dwayne
It’s a pity FFs so called sharp mind isn’t linked to a sharp wit. I can run rings round him and by the way he is the one that is defensive I am the one that is refusing to answer his demanding questions OVER AND OVER AGAIN.
LikeLike
DwayneDwoo said:
Guy, i was quite happy to stay in the background until you prompted a response from me. I tend to say what i see and to me you do come across slightly paranoid and defensive. If you were to be really honest Guy, you would admit that it was the Danny LaRue clip which entered your Psyche and the ‘like’ simply enhanced this entry….. I do no care about your sexuality, the origins of your Childrens school meals or your morals.
LikeLike
guy fawkes said:
Dwayne
The sock shop should invest in this site!
LikeLike
guy fawkes said:
ps. I have nothing to be paranoid about – “infamy, infamy they’ve all got it informe” is Fink’s bag, with his cries of homophobe and bigot.
LikeLike
DwayneDwoo said:
…..was it the Danny LaRue clip?
LikeLike
guy fawkes said:
Or quite possibly the Kenneth williams clip from carry on being a prat.
LikeLike
DwayneDwoo said:
ooooooh you are awful……but I’ll take that as a yes.
LikeLike
guy fawkes said:
Being as perverse as your master you would say yes.
LikeLike
DwayneDwoo said:
ooooh you are awful, but i like you.
LikeLike
guy fawkes said:
I know you do because you think I’m guy, sorry gay!
LikeLike
DwayneDwoo said:
there you go again… thinking about what other people are thinking… concentrate on politics for a change, ok Mandy?
LikeLike
guy fawkes said:
I had a sister called Mandy, she died when she was young.
LikeLike
DwayneDwoo said:
and you was thinking that i would automatically know that?
By referring to you as Mandy, I must have obviously upset you and for that i apologise. I’m sorry.
LikeLike
guy fawkes said:
That’s ok she died before I was born, which is a shame cos she could have been my parents skivvy instead of me.
If you want to talk politics I prefer the Lord Les Patterson kind.
LikeLike
DwayneDwoo said:
Discussing Politics is not really my thing. I can only see humour in Politics. Some take Politics very seriously, not me. Most Politicians concentrate on self interest and self importance, their own standard of living is all they really care about.
I enjoy taking the piss out of certain types of people, MP’s being one of those types.
My view is that Politics change nothing.
LikeLike
guy fawkes said:
A perfect answer Dwayne.
LikeLiked by 1 person
guy fawkes said:
ps look up Sir Les pattersons utube clips anyway for a jolly good laugh haw haw!
LikeLiked by 1 person
FinkFurst said:
“If you think bisexuality is normal, it shows how abnormal you are mr Funk.”
Why do you think bisexuality is abnormal? Do you also think homosexuality is also abnormal?
LikeLike
guy fawkes said:
I think anything that concerns you is abnormal, especially your repeated questioning on the same subject.
You know all of my answers and they are not going to change.
end of!
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
No, you’ve never explained why you think bisexuality or homosexuality is abnormal. If it’s your honestly held opinion, why are you reluctant to explain it?
LikeLike