From March this year, the BBC’s Daily Politics had weekly – and often daily – reports and segments on anti-semitism in Labour.
But these reports have now completely stopped since the local elections finished.
Interestingly, a quick check of the Daily Politics Twitter timeline reveals they also did EXACTLY the same in the run-up to the 2016 local elections.
From around March 2016, there were weekly/daily reports on anti-semitism in Labour by Andrew Neil and co, which also mysteriously ceased literally one or two days after the 2016 local elections were over.
The next report on Daily Politics on anti-semitism in that year, as far as I can tell, was a good 5 months or so after the 2016 local elections.
The pattern, however, was not the same in the run-up to the general election in 2017 – in which the issue of anti-semitism was barely mentioned. Could this be because anti-semitism is something that tends to affect voting intentions in local elections, but tends not to have any significant effect on voting intentions during general elections?
A similar pattern can be seen with all of the mainstream press; of dragging out a supposed problem with anti-semitism in Labour every two years in the run-up to local elections, only to more or less ignore the issue until the next local elections come round.
Daily Politics literally had 4 or 5 reports on anti-semitism in 2017, until the run-up to this year’s elections, when from about March, they started the same pattern of weekly – often daily – segments and reports on Labour’s supposed anti-semitism problem.
But their reports have again also almost completely disappeared now the local elections are over.
Obviously, Daily Politics could argue that the Tories – knowing the anti-semitism issue is effective in local elections – have tried to weaponise it for party politics, and they are just reporting on that.
But then, why did Daily Politics not have weekly/daily segments on issues Labour was trying to weaponise during the campaign too, such as housing, the NHS, police cuts etc etc.?
My own research has shown that anti-semitism is not actually a major problem on the Left, but is almost entirely a problem on the Right:
I would argue it is the job of good political journalists to make sure they do not become part of any party’s narrative in their campaign strategies.
But on this matter – as usual – the BBC’s poliitical journalists have utterly failed.
Anti-semitism is far too important an issue to allow it to be dragged out once every couple of years just before local elections and used for petty party political point-scoring by politicians.
Shame on you Daily Politics.
Pingback: “Why does the BBC have wall-to-wall reporting on anti-Semitism every 2 years just before local elections” | Pride’s Purge | COMRADE BOYCIE
Editor said:
Reblogged this on kickingthecat.
LikeLike
Dave Eagle said:
Anybody who take The Daily Politics seriously, is not to be taken seriously.
LikeLiked by 1 person
sdbast said:
Reblogged this on sdbast.
LikeLike
nearlydead said:
Reblogged this on nearlydead.
LikeLike
Phil O'Keefe said:
Good political journalism is in dreadfully short supply
LikeLiked by 1 person
Tony said:
Conservative welcoming election victories by foreign anti-semites is not considered newsworthy. And Saudi anti-semistism never gets reported either.
LikeLiked by 2 people
aunty1960 said:
Had not noticed it until Corbyn came in and the anti semitism smears happened
LikeLiked by 4 people
4foxandhare said:
I haven’t seen any anti-semitism anywhere in the Labour Party. Nor do I believe that KenLivingstone’s comments were anti-semitic. He was stating a truth, when he spoke about Hitler meeting with Jews in the early 1930s.
LikeLiked by 1 person
A6er said:
Reblogged this on Britain Isn't Eating.
LikeLike
hippyim1 said:
Reblogged this on hippyim1.
LikeLike
Phil O'Keefe said:
Corbyn is a threat to the UK political hegemony of support for Israel. It took years to get in place. Labour Friends of Israel and Bicom won’t spare any effort to get rid of him. They have shown themselves willing to undermine the party with no thought to cost of losing ground electorally.
Or perhaps a lot of thought…
LikeLiked by 1 person
jo said:
I think people in uk keep forgetting the royal family and they think that people like corby would be able to point a torchlight on them if elected…its quite possible he could stir enough support amongst the people to cause them a discomforting ride..annnnd thats really all this is all about ie ”corby danger to england”..yes their england not actual UK . As for racism well that’s a form of bigotry which is a form of arrogance and ignorance plain and simple… anti semetic is nothing to do with race ,its a taunt plain and simple and its slushed about by political media like its some kind of be all and end all of good vs evil…which it is really as it was that word that caused millions to be persecuted and murdered..but I digress ,if corby is a millimeter as powerful as Hitler was even if he won the ‘big job’ I will eat my own legs live on tv.
Sum up …anti semitism means fk all in the uk except a very low blow insult to either side receiving it (one because your being called a callous evil twat the other because your being persecuted for a being linked to a collective) Corby said he would talk to the likes of hellboz and they are seriously a collective who hate the semetic to try and work the issues out (doubt he would succeed myself) but thats the opposite of what the horrible tory press are trying to swing and that in itself shows you everything you need to know about how poor they are …based on what they have to offer to hold office its a sad sad shower of nobodies that call names and spread hate tactics rather than just do ‘a good job’ and then corby wouldnt get a sniff regardless of his ideas now would he ..
In my opinion of course but just getting a little (lot) tired of the msm and their constant disgusting split everybody into groups and hate strategy…please stop buying into this shit and the BBC is fkng awful thanks to Laura Kus . Hope the next election unites this country and we vote both sides out and stick the monarchy back in charge…that will teach them (only 1 person to blame then eh)
LikeLike
seachranaidhe1 said:
Reblogged this on seachranaidhe1.
LikeLike
Dave Eagle said:
“Sum up …anti semitism means fk all in the uk…”
It’s precisely this kind of denial of the seriousness of antisemitism which allows it to take place. Shame on you.
LikeLike
jo said:
Dave the troll eagle ..
how about you sum up what it means .. then we will see who has shame .
People like you disgust me to my core ,and I mean that with all my heart …you know why (thats a statement not a question) ..to the core you understand .
Your hatefilled time is nearly over if you look around the world ..love and friendships are taking back over this world and you should crawl back under your rock where you belong .
LikeLike
Dave Eagle said:
Of course I can sum it up… Antisemitism in the UK is very real and causes actual harm to many Jews, and must not be tolerated or ignored.
Antisemitism deniers like you are a fundamental part of the problem. So are web sites such as this, which seek to portray it as a Tory-only problem, and equally the Tories who seek to portray it as a Labour-only problem. Are either of you capable of understanding that neither are true?
LikeLike
czakal said:
One of the Daily Politics presenters, Jo Coburn, is Jewish, of course. That may be an explanatory factor, but one you dare not mention for fear of being branding “anti-Semitic” yourself.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Dave Eagle said:
“Anti-semitism is far too important an issue to allow it to be dragged out once every couple of years just before local elections and used for petty party political point-scoring by politicians”… or bloggers such as Tom Pride.
LikeLike
czakal said:
You say anti-Semitism is far too important an issue. But why is it an important issue? Jews have the highest average income of any ethnic group; they have the highest per capita representation of any ethnic group in Parliament, in the Sunday Times rich list, among the upper echelons of the profession of journalism. If anti-Semitism was so pervasive, none of this would be possible.
And according to the CST reports, there haven’t been any physical attacks on Jews that would merit a charge of GBH in the last two years. By real-world metrics, then, anti-Semitism is a “problem” that is virtually non-existent. It is the only “problem” constantly featured in high-profile political discussions that has virtually no tangibly discernible adverse impact on anyone’s life.
Jews are the most powerful and privileged ethnic group in Britain and the constant mediatisation of an almost non-existent problem is the clearest illustration of that power and privilege.
Judging by polls showing 13% Jewish support for Labour at the last general election and 14% at the one before that (with a Jewish leader), factoring in average abstention levels, Labour probably got around 15,000 -18,000 votes from Jews in these elections. All of this drama and hysteria for 15 thousand votes?
LikeLike
Đỗ Trọng Chương said:
Poor Ken Livingstone!
LikeLike
brettghartmann said:
It seems to have passed many by that Mark Regev/Freiberg has been Israel’s ambassador to the United Kingdom since Mr Corbyn was elected leader of L P.
This person is a self-claimed Zionist with very close associations with the so-called “Israel Defense Forces” and has appeared on UK TV on numerous occasions as a justifier (Not even an apologist) of many human rights violations, (Murder / assassinations) by the “IDF” (sic).in his capacity as spokesman for the Govt of Israel.
Vide:
His dialogue with Jon Snow: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HGahJzFdqaY
His dialogue with Emily Maitlis: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TRfNRQblXbs&t=207s
Mr Corbyn is ” … absolutely committed to a meaningful peace process between Israelis and Palestinians and that has to be one based on the 1967 borders.”
How better for Mr Regev to add to the ‘Get rid of Corbyn at Any Cost’ campaign than to accuse Corbyn of being an anti-semite, and Leftists / Momentum riddled with such too?
LikeLike
Đỗ Trọng Chương said:
Free Tommy Robinson!
LikeLiked by 1 person
brettghartmann said:
Đỗ Trọng Chương said: June 11, 2018 at 9:27 pm
“Free Tommy Robinson!”
———
Where can I get my Free one, please?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Đỗ Trọng Chương said:
Try a public toilet.
LikeLiked by 1 person
brettghartmann said:
Just as might be expected from a piece of human waste such as he.
LikeLiked by 1 person