Tags
(not satire – it’s the Tories!)
This story isn’t new but I feel it needs more traction.
In 2007, two women were driving along an isolated country road when suddenly a car pulled up in front of them blocking their way.
Two men jumped out, ran to the women’s car and started breaking the windows. One of the thugs managed to steal a camera and car keys before one of the women managed to call the police and the men escaped.
The two men were caught the next day by the police.
However, despite being convicted, the violent thieves only received Conditional Discharges and a £350 fine.
Now in a civil case, the two women have finally been awarded compensation for their ordeal – albeit just £8,000 worth of it.
It took the women the best part of 7 years to finally get justice.
Both men are friends of prime minister David Cameron. They are leading members of the Heythrop Hunt in Cameron’s Oxfordshire constituency – which Cameron has ridden with. One of the men is Tory and Countryside Alliance supporter Brian Ferry’s son – Charles Otis Ferry.
Charles – or Otis as he prefers to call himself – was educated at Marlborough public school. The same private school that several Tory MPs and both Cameron’s and George Osborne’s wives attended.
Violent thugs don’t have to come with working class accents and hooded tops.
.
Please feel free to comment.
.
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
And these were two women were just coming back from a shopping trip with five hand bags and ten pairs of shoes – yeah? LOL.
All politicians are liars, criminals and thugs, whether violent or otherwise. Anyone who tries to make out that there are good MPs and bad MPs is like an idiot who falls for the good cop, bad cop routine, when they are all bad or bent.
LikeLike
wildthing666 said:
£8000 loosechange to these parasitic scum should have been hundreds of thousands they had to pay
LikeLike
Barry Davies said:
Had it been someone from the east end of london, moss side manchester etc. they would have been in prison £350.00 fine wouldn’t be as much as they blow in a night.
LikeLike
Pingback: Violent thugs with public school accents and co...
holmey said:
The old adage that you can judge a man by the friends that he keeps comes to my mind…
LikeLike
Blah, blah said:
As the saying goes “you can’t polish a turd”….
LikeLike
Mervyn Hyde said:
The same Otis that invaded the House of Commons with other protesters against the fox Hunting ban.
Why haven’t they been put in jail, it’s just the sort of thing they would demand if it was working class yobs?
LikeLike
doralora said:
why did they feel the need to do this? what possible defense can possibly justify a £350 fine?
LikeLike
Mike Sivier said:
Reblogged this on Vox Political and commented:
Interesting. I wonder if this is why I was phoned up (while I was still working at a big regional daily newspaper) and warned that there would be an attempt to kill Ferry (Jr)? The threat came to nothing but I wondered why it had been made. I’m not sure the dates tie up but it seems logical.
LikeLike
Graham Hughes said:
I remember a former pupil of Marlborough College from my student days. he was the son of some bloke with a title and was on the Estate Management course to learn (Some hope, he was thick as a pudding) to look after the family estates. I recall he was very strongly opposed to Page three girls in the Sun,on the bizarre grounds that it gave the ordinary man ideas above his station in that he would wrongly be led to think “that beautiful women were available to him” Thankfully we didn’t have to endure him for long as he was thrown out in his first term for stealing the blankets from his room in the Hall of Residence. It would seem that Marlborough has at least remained consistent over the years in the standards of conduct of its “old boys”
LikeLike
beastrabban said:
Reblogged this on Beastrabban’s Weblog and commented:
Another example of one law for the rich, another for the poor. As for Mr Pride’s observation that not all violent thugs have working class accents and hooded tops, this has been true all down the ages. Some of the most violent street gangs in history were the children of the aristocracy looking for a bit of thuggish fun kicking the lower orders around, like the Mohocks in 17th century England or Les Rosbifs in 18th century France. Over a decade ago a friend of mine in London told me of a violent, outlaw biker gang that the cops had finally broken up and sent to prison. Instead of coming from dead end council estates, they were all stockbrokers and lawyers, I believe.
LikeLike
gingerblokeblog said:
Reblogged this on gingerblokeblog and commented:
So the rich can be prosecuted of aggravated theft from a vehicle plus surely actual bodily harm to the women and face a paltry fine.
I’m becoming a rich Tory so I can do as I please and not have to face the consequences; it works for Cameron, Osborne, IDS and former Cult Sec, Jeremy Hunt!
LikeLike
Dr Lawrence S. Roberts. said:
Cameron is a spiv as are his cronies. Hard Labour is the only answer for this mob.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
Where did that part about handbags and shoes come from? Did you make it up?
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
…Oh, I forgot. Everything you have and everything you know is given to you by your god! So why would your god make up a silly, pointless lie like that?
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
Of course, and to make my point.
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
See my other comment.
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
All politicians are spivs, liars, traitors, criminals, low life, vermin, scum, filth and many, if not most, are solicitors or barristers. QED.
Added to which, all are Bolshevik Marxists and servants of the Canaanite Jew Banksters.
LikeLike
Martha Tulip said:
what? Miliband’s ‘hard labour’??????????????
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
In that case why did YOU make it up – what was your point?
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
What??? Who are these “Canaanite Jew Banksters”? Can you name one?
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
Oh dear! To point out that they were not on a shopping expedition and were most likely hunt sabateurs or sworn enemies of the hunting fraternity – prod a hornet’s nest and you will get stung.
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
Can you name one that isn’t – and I mean those at the top?
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
The Milibands are Canaanite Bolshevik Marxist Jews and are more than happy to see the indeginous peoples of Britian doing hard labour.
They are NOT British, and they are our enemies.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
Oh dear! – It’s perfectly obvious if you bothered to read the article that they WERE sworn enemies of the hunting fraternity.
Are you saying that it was therefore acceptable for them to be “stung” – meaning having their car damaged and their possessions stolen?
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
No, because as far as I know there is no such thing as a “Canaanite Jew Bankster”. You said it, but now you can’t justify it. That makes you a fool or a liar.
LikeLike
Aelfy Petra Nightentity said:
Having been directed to your site,when clicking on your ah errrrm name (thetruthnotdoctrine). I feel that you yourself are so deluded and full of yourself that you really and I do mean Really!!! have no right to spout such Trash about ALL Politicians As I personally have known a few very good ones, sadly they no longer do such work and have left politics altogether. YOU on the other hand really do need to stop acting as the Grand Troll and sort yourself out,and start taking the tablets they really do work if you take them as prescribed. I wish you well and hope that you recover soonest. xx
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
“As far as you know” – and therein lies your problem, especially when there is so much real historical/news information now available on the web.
Ignorance such as yours can only be described as breathtaking.
Here is some good advice: 1) Switch off your LED and radio for at least a month. 2) Don’t read any MSM pig’s swill non-news for a month. 3) Search out as many Alternative News and Revisionist History sources as you can.
Then, and only then, will you begin to become informed.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
If they are your enemies, what do you think you should do about them?
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
If you’re claiming you know a good politician then it’s YOU who is deluded – PERIOD!!!!!
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
Canaan no longer exists, so all Canaanites died long ago. You are therefore talking drivel.
Are you saying that all senior people in the banking profession are Jewish?
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
Neither side’s behaviour was/is ‘acceptable’ (whatever that means), but if you go asking for trouble, then you will get it so don’t whinge afterwards. Always count the cost before you start.
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
It’s not for me to do anything about them, when I know they will be wiped from the face of the earth when Yashua Messiah returns.
Vengeance is His, not mine, afterall it’s the Miliband’s ancestors that crucified Him.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
So what did the two women in the car do which was not acceptable?
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
So you think one day ‘Yashua Messiah’ will wipe out all Jews from the face of the earth? Does that mean kill them all?
…and errrrrrmmmm – I don’t like to remind you of this, but wasn’t he supposedly Jewish himself?
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
The land of Canaan may not exist, as it is now called Palestine and unlawfully occupied and named by The Canaanite Jews, as Israel, so The Devil’s Seed i.e. The Canaanites – The Tares definitely still exist. They actually rule the world.
Canaan is the continuation of Cain’s name. Hence we have Cain’s descendant John McCain in the US senate. Mac = son of. Quayle is another Canaanite name. Kenya in Africa is really Cainya.
I recommend that you study my articles as part of your education.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
Excellent – At least you’ve now admitted that you were talking drivel. That’s a good start. Now we’ve agreed that there’s no such thing as a “Canaanite”, who WERE you talking about?
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
Yes, all of them. They are The Devil’s Seed from Cain who was Eve’s child from the Devil. It’s all written in The Talmud.
Yashua Messiah was a Royal Judahite, not a Canaanite Jew.
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
The Truth can never be drivel and your closed mind based opinions are not helpful to meaningful discussion.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
To be clear, you think one day ‘Yashua Messiah’ will kill all the Jews on the earth, and you approve of this? Is that yes or no?
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
I’ll take that as a “don’t know”!
LikeLike
Ian clarke said:
Very entertaining reading these replies hahaha Thanks 🙂
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
Sadly, I don’t have time to continue this.
So Tom… supposing he said “Yes”, would that be acceptable free speech, and would it legal or illegal?
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
I don’t think, I know He will. My approval or disapproval is an irrelevance. That is what He will do and He will do it with fire.
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
“Sadly, I don’t have time to continue this.” A great start to the working week then.
All speech is acceptable, if it’s not, then we do not have free speech, and let’s face it I have been reading your ignorant twaddle for several days now and some might think that should be banned. LOL
Legal is not lawful and Illegal is not necessarily unlawful. You need to learn the difference.
FinkFurst? You need a head full of real knowledge before you can do that.
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
I don’t know, I wasn’t there, but people like those mentioned don’t go around attacking other people’s property for no reason. E.g. I am sure I could drive down the same road without fear of being attacked, but then I would be minding my own business and not poking my nose into other people’s business.
The story was loaded, in other words, by what it didn’t tell us.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
Don’t you know whether it’s right or wrong to kill all Jews? You have the ability to judge right and wrong, so presumably you think your god gave you that ability for a reason…
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
I wasn’t asking you.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
You just said that their behaviour wasn’t acceptable, and now you say you don’t know what they did! Make up your mind.
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
You were asking the question on a public forum, so I did what I have every right to do, i.e. correct you regarding free speech and the law.
LikeLike
Aelfy Petra Nightentity said:
Wonders will never cease, I have been called deluded by the greatest of all the deluded and apparently will get a period too. I am ??????only being hung by a seat belt felt better. Ah well it takes all sorts and yes I do know a few ex politicians who are verygood and caring people in both their professional and personal lives. Isn’t it nice being deluded? 😀
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
Especially if it means you might avoid the questions actually asked of you! What are you afraid of?
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
They are Canaanite Jews – Hamitic, not Semitic, so they lie about their origins and, I might add, everything else.
I judge no one, I leave it to others to condemn themselves by what comes out of their own mouths and what they type with their keyboards. I don’t have to say a word.
Plus, I have already made it clear that I am a mere messenger of Yashua Messiah, that’s all, so I speak The Truth.
The Truth, though, is a Two Edged Sword and cuts deep and therefore causes considerable discomfort, to say the least.
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
I explained that there are many Canaanites. Hu-man beings are Canaanites. Men are sons of Adam – mankind and they are not hu-man beings. I am talking about two different species.
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
What questions have I not answered?
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
Wonderful to be nice when you’re out of office eh? Reminds me of the war criminal and traitor Blair. Nice.
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
I said neither side’s behaviour was ‘acceptable’ (whatever that means) What does it mean? YOU used the word first, not me.
I don’t know what they did exactly but I know they did something otherwise they would not have been attacked. Perhaps you can enlighten us.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
doctrinenottruth
So far you don’t seem to have any morals at all! Perhaps it’s the size of the moral question that you can’t handle, so let’s make it smaller.
Is it wrong to block all the exits from a synagogue full of Jewish families, then set it on fire? Surely you can answer that…
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
Look at the post times you plonker!
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
You’re having trouble keeping up, aren’t you? Never mind, I guess it’s very difficult if you’re not very bright and you can’t find the answer in the bible.
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
I have no use for morals, only The Truth, and that’s because one man’s morals are another man’s anathema.
There won’t be any synagogues as they will be gone, too, so no need to block exits. Likewise there will be no church buildings or mosques. There will be no religion in the Kingdom of God.
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
I don’t know what you’re talking about. And being rude scores you no points.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
You avoided the question again! Is it wrong to block all the exits from a synagogue full of Jewish families, then set it on fire?
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
I have avoided nothing. Your question is not relevant. Everything is going to be swept away and a new start for those left – The Remnant.
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
PS But there will be no Canaanite Jews amongst that Remnant.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
The question is relevant to how readers think of you and the message you are trying to communicate.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
That’s because you’re not very bright – i.e. a plonker!
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
Apparently the bible disagrees with you about morality! That’s a little awkward, isn’t it?
LikeLike
don't call me mark said:
Another group of thugs were the Flaming Masseratis who used to trash restaurants. These Oxbridge oafs included jailbird Jeffery Archer’s son.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
P.S. If you readily admit to being 100% amoral, then it must be assumed that everything you say is also amoral. Do you agree that everything you say amoral?
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
I guess you’ve had time to check about morality now. It seems from what you just said that YOU are not going to inherit the kingdom of god either… OOOOOOPS!!!
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
The Truth is not ear tickling. If people want that, they can join the Anglicans (real name AngliCAIN) or something similar.
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
Morals nor ethics are not taught in The Holy Scriptures. All morals are the creation of men or hu-man beings.
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
Amorality is still based upon the concept of morals. Morals have nothing to do with The Truth or the Gospel Message.
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
The Kingdom is already in me – I am an ambassador of The Kingdom.
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
The answer is knowing that the poster of the original article is a dissembler and disengenuous.
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
Name calling is the last refuge of someone with no argument.
And being bright is not necessary when one is called of The Father.
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
Should read “Morals nor ethics are taught”
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
Errrrr… have you ever even read the bible? Or are you disagreeing with what it says?
You just said “I have no use for morals”. I suggest you try looking in the bible for references to morality, especially sexual morality, and then think again. You just admitted to everyone that you have no morality of any sort, so according to the bible you’re going to burn in hell for eternity!
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
You mean it should read “Morals nor ethics are taught in The Holy Scriptures”. That doesn’t even make sense!
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
You’re just like that Guy Fawkes ignoramous – you cannot read and comprehend and then jump to no end of erroneous conclusions. I have told you – morals are not taught in The Holy Scriptures and you will not find that word in The Holy Scriptures.
Morals are man made – period.
I also said nothing about burning for all eternity.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
Do you mean that Tom Pride “is a dissembler and disengenuous”? Try turning that description on yourself!
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
Next
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
Let’s first agree that you said you have no use for sexual morality. Is that so?
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
Here is an article I wrote on this subject 8 years ago. http://ezinearticles.com/?Is-The-Christian-Life-About-Ethics-And-Morals?&id=704998
Sexual morality does not apply to me, as one man’s sexual morality is immoral to another man.
Certain traditions of cultures dictate what their morals are and they vary from one ethnic group to another. Perhaps you would like to tell me which culture’s morals are moral or immoral?
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
Charlie – You’re avoiding the question again!!! You said “I have no use for morals” and that includes sexual morals. You were either lying or telling the truth. Which is it?
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
I’m not avoiding anything. I am guided and led by much higher principles than morals – That which is moral or immoral are like legal or illegal. You truly are slow to catch on.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
Does sexual morality apply to anybody else, or is it only you it doesn’t apply to?
To answer you question – Cultures do not have morals, people do, and I can only answer for mine.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
I’ll ask again – Does morality apply to anybody else, or is it only you who is exempt?
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
P.S. I assume you agree that the KJV version of the bible is the word of your god. Let me know if you don’t. We’ll get on to that presently…
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
First of all, what morality? Whose morality? Yours, your next door neighbour’s?
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
I missed this astonishing assertion! Are you saying that Jews are a biologically different species from Homo sapiens?
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
No, The KJV is the translation work of Freemasons and men of The Cainite-Judeo-Christian religion – people with agendas of their own – religious agendas not Yashua Messiah’s agenda – The Truth.
The KJV CONTAINS the Holy Scriptures but of itself it is not The Holy Scriptures – it contains several errors and omissions.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
You’re not keeping up again! Does ANY morality apply to ANYBODY except you, or are you saying there is no such thing as morality?
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
PS it’s best not to assume anything especially when your knowledge is very limited.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
It’s strange that you keep referring to it then! So, would you care to tell everybody which version IS the word of your god, without errors and omissions?
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
Precisely, so how many sets of morals are there? People have cultures, tribal, clannish with traditions, call them what you will and with those cultures along with their traditions will come a set of morals.
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
Yes that’s exactly what I mean and I have proven it.
[I’ve been called much worse things than a ‘dissembler and disengenuous’] -TOM
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
…and apparently you claim to be the only person in the word who has no morality! Are you?
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
P.S. If you agree that cultures have no morality, then why the **** did you ask?????
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
The KJV is a book, that’s all. The Holy Scriptures within that book are His Word and have to be searched out by cross checking with the Hebrew OT and Greek NT. For that I use Interlinear Bibles and Transliteral Bible software or any other reliable sources.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
Tom will have to answer that accusation for himself, or not…
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
“…or any other reliable sources”!!!! What a pathetic little ‘get-out’. You constantly claim that ‘The Holy Scriptures’ are the word of your god, but you don’t even know what they are!
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
So some parts of the KJV are the word of your god and some are not, and you alone decide which is which?
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
Oh I’m keeping up alright and you’re slithering like a snake again or is it that you have a very poor memory?
Let me recap for you:
1) Morals are not in The Holy Scriptures so they do not apply to me.
2) All morals are man made or hu-man made and only apply to those who made them.
3) You’re asking if any morality applies to anybody except me? No, the same rule applies to any man or woman Born of God.
4) Where have I said there is no such thing as morality? Morality is a man made concept made for men and has nothing to do with God.
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
No, anyone Born of God has no need of morality. I keep telling you that morals are man made standards, not God’s standards.
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
I know what a corruption is and I know what a false addition is, because with study they can be ascertained. I have been doing this for over thirty years, so I know.
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
The Holy Spirit decides, not the intellect alone.
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
So have I and by someone who claims they finkfirst, LOL, but it goes with the job.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
1) Morality IS stated many times in the KJV of the bible, to which you have referred countless times. Have you alone decided that every such reference is an error?
2) I agree that all morals are man made. The bible states the reverse.
3) Errrrr… you just said that morals DO NOT apply to you! I guess you were therefore not “Born of God”.
4) If you have no morals then how do you know there is such a thing as morality?
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
Ah… that’s handy. I don’t suppose ‘The Holy Spirit’ wrote any of this marvellous stuff down did it?
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
Not Jews, Canaanite Jews and yes they are a different species from men, being sons of Canaan, not Judah.
I don’t use the non-word homo.
We are either man or hu-man.
‘Hu’ from the Hebrew/Gaelic and Hebrew Old English tongues means ‘serpent’. So a hu-man is a ‘serpent-man’ from the Devil and Eve in The Garden through Cain to Canaan post-flood.
If you read Genesis 38 the story of the beginnings of the Canaanite Jews is there.
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
No, I have done that in my articles so be my guest.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
thetruthnotdoctrine – Can I just confirm that you definitely said that “Canaanite Jews” are a different species from men?
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
So ‘The Holy Spirit’ told you which parts of the KJV are ‘kosher’ (so to speak) and then you wrote them down?
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
The Canaanite Jews are The Tares, the Devil’s Seed and are therefore not sons of Adam, but sons of The Devil. Which is what Yashua Messiah also said in John 8.
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
I don’t repeat myself. All my work is my articles which is guided by The Holy Spirit.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
No, you’re wrong. John 8 doesn’t mention species at all.
Do you even know what the word “species” means?
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
The words morals and moral are not Scriptural words. If you’re calling them morals then that is a corrupt interpretation.
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
I’m never wrong, and I didn’t say it said species. I used the word species and I used it to mean a different genealogical origin – that is what I meant by it.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
If you don’t know what the word “species” means then look it up and answer my question! – Are you saying that Jews are a biologically different species from Homo sapiens?
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
P.S. Every person (except siblings) is genealogically different you moron!
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
I am aware of that, but all genealogies have a beginning or are you going to quote Darwinism crap?
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
There is no such thing as a homo-sapien.
LikeLike
Aelfy Petra Nightentity said:
If you are never wrong, than you cannot be human, therefore you are either some sort of deity /spirit/demon take your pick. You really shouldn’t mix with the merely human mortals. Don’t you know that they have a corrupting influence on your kind? Ooopsy obviously not as you are still answering where answers are not necessary . I am officially mentally ill yet even I mere mortal female as I am can see straight through you *shudders* I need new glasses. You make no sense,your so called answers are even more rhetoric that come nowhere near sense. I’m taking my medicines religiously perhaps you should do the same? Alas you are but a mere Troll which cannot take anything that is perceived as critical to your ramblings, I fear for those that believe you and goodness help the rest of us if you and yours ever ever get any form of power other than that to amuse. I hope you get well soon xxx
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
Correct I am a man, not a hu-man and I have been made right by Yashua Messiah so I can never be wrong, even when I am ‘wrong’.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
Yes, a new genealogy begins with EVERY conception you complete and utter moron!
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
“There is no such thing as a homo-sapien.” Correct, the term is “Homo sapiens”. It’s not a plural you moron!
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
Not so, You have to be a Patriarch in order to start a new tribe or clan or nation. Everyone is someone’s descendant.
LikeLike
Aelfy Petra Nightentity said:
Silly Boy! if you are what is termed a Man, then what the heck are all these seriously silly ramblings of yours doing to prove that? Absolutely nothing. I’m happily giggling away here, for now there is nothing you can say, that will ever redeem you in the eyes of your holy spirit/godhead etc if it ever existed except in your mind. Will I go to hell? I most certainly hope so, for that is actually this poor earth after your lot have finished with it, and I will be among the cleanup crew……. c`est la vie lol
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
Your point scoring is like scraping the barrel. LOL I will repeat for the gnat strainer finkfurst. There is no such thing as homo sapiens.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
“There is no such thing as homo sapiens” So what species are you? …and PLEASE look up the word before you give an even more embarrassing answer!
You could of course deny that there is any such thing as a species, but then you would have to explain why you already talked about it! This isn’t looking good, and we’ve barely started yet!
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
So which parts of the KJV are wrong? You STILL haven’t answered!
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
Everyone goes to hell. Hell is just a hole in the ground – from the Hebrew ‘sheol’ – the grave.
My ramblings as you call them are The Truth. Unfortuantely you are victim of the real ramblings of The Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion that teach the lie of fiery eternal torment.
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
How many times do I have to say it? And you call me a moron. I am a man. Do you know what a man is?
I have no need to look up the word species.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
Let’s try just one of these again (we can get to the rest later) – If you have no morals then how do you know there is such a thing as morality? …Or are you now saying that you DO have morals?
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
My answer to your comment is below.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
Yes, of course I know, it’s a male of the species Homo sapiens. What the **** do YOU think a man is? Apparently you think a Jew cannot be a man. Is that correct?
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
No it isn’t! What species are you, if you are not Homo sapiens?
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
“You have to be a Patriarch in order to start a new tribe or clan or nation”
What’s that got to do with anything? If you’re going to write in English then you need to first understand what English words mean! Why don’t you **** off and read a dictionary and then start all over again. Begin with the words “species”, “genealogy” and “moron”.
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
A man is a man, not a member of mythical homo-sapiens.
I don’t think, I know. Canaanite Jews are hu-man beings, not men.
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
It’s got to do with everything I am saying. If you cannot understand it is that my fault.
LikeLike
Aelfy Petra Nightentity said:
Now you really are showing everyone just what a presumptuous little lad you are 😀 Presuming I’m a product of your own background, silly ,silly and silly again. I am not and thank goodness that I am not, for you and your kind are anathema to me and mine… Stay with your little thoughts and narrowest of minds, it’s where you belong. There is a great deal of good in this world you and yours are not and never will be a part of it, you are only a part of the problem but are so swollen up with your own impotance you cannot see it oops I’m supposed to mean importance, but my fingers tell the truth and cannot lie. Perhaps I too should practice your form of free speech without self censorship naaah that is the most problematic part and tact too plays a part in free speech but I guess you ignore that as well? I still wish you well and hope for your very speedy recovery,but alas you will always be an embittered mentally old (sounding) male of the Homo sapien/s…..A group that I too belong in… Oh one point I digress but I must, what is the point of a Patriarch if there is no Matriarch to keep him company? hmmm food for thought and on that thought I’m off for my dinner 😀 xx
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
You said:
“Will I go to hell? I most certainly hope so, for that is actually this poor earth after your lot have finished with it, and I will be among the cleanup crew…….”
This statement proves you have been conditioned into thinking that people will be alive in hell and only the Cainite-Judeo-Christian religion teaches that idea (as far as I know). So I am presuming nothing.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
“A man is a man” – Wow, that’s impressive!!! Did you think of that all by yourself? I think you should also look up the word “lightweight”!
I have numerous questions still outstanding. Are you ready to answer any of them, or do you need some time to consult the ‘holy spirit’?
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
“If you cannot understand it is that my fault”. Correct (apart from the strange grammar), but it’s not your communication, it’s your thinking. THAT is where you are falling down… you have to think first.
LikeLike
Aelfy Petra Nightentity said:
No sweetheart I was merely putting my thoughts into terms you would surely understand. After all what is the point of a discussion if one does not at least try to be understood….. Presumptuous by name and nature, you really didn’t think of that did you? That someone actually tried to put a message that you should understand just for you? ah well oh and in case you just may have an iota of curiosity Dinner is delicious….. 😀
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
That’s the point, I did understand it, but you obviously found my reply offensive for some reason.
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
As long as they’re not loaded questions and I may leave them to the morrow, as it’s getting near to my rest and relaxation time.
LikeLike
Aelfy Petra Nightentity said:
Not at all dear, just checking that you are still alert, and I am glad that you truly did understand it……xx
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
OK, we can start with… Is it wrong to block all the exits from a synagogue full of Jewish families, then set it on fire?
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
Aelfy – I’m just wondering… but would you REALLY kiss somebody who thinks that all Jews in the world should be killed? I have to say kissing isn’t the verb I would use!
LikeLike
Aelfy Petra Nightentity said:
hmmm x’s don’t always signify kisses you know. I shall leave that up to you to work out 😀 x that one is a kiss if you want it 🙂
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
I can’t work it out – what does “xx” signify? You are not ignorant of the substantive point, but if you choose to ignore the concept of murdering millions of innocent people then that’s your choice… and your morality.
LikeLike
Aelfy Petra Nightentity said:
Oh dear 😥 I have never ignored that concept at all and that applies to all murders mass or otherwise 🙂 Have you never crossed anything out that seems distasteful? I am not referring to the poor victims but to the fact that I find the writings of thetruthnotdoctrine extremely distastful. I do hope that clears it up for you, and no I am not being sarcastic, I’ve really enjoyed reading your replies and to be honest I thought you would get my gist. Though it has been a very long day and a bit tiring on top of that. I am sorry very sorry that you thought I might support or write off that terrible,terrible event.
LikeLike
Aelfy Petra Nightentity said:
Drat! where did that smile smilie come from, I can only blame tired fingers and even more tired eyes. Please ignore the smile that should not be there
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
Aelfy – I think you are making light of a very serious subject. That’s up to you, but I cannot. Maybe you have not yet seen enough brutal reality in your life, and I hope you never do. However, I thank you for being the ONLY other person who has even tried to oppose this disgusting opinion that all Jews should be killed.
…and Tom, I include you in that criticism.
LikeLike
Aelfy Petra Nightentity said:
Sadly I have seen and been in far more brutality in my life than perhaps you might imagine. If you think that perhaps I am making light of the situation, then I am sorry that was not my intention, on the last message I left out all x’s and smilies as I did not want to give any offense whatsoever. I failed, nothing out of the ordinary there and no please don’t take that as me being facetious ……. I hope you have not experienced what I have and that is why I despise the majority of life taking, sadly some is till going on and to stop that we have to resort to the same violence to restrain them. None of it is good… Life is the most precious thing in this whole world and no I’m not a vegetarian as some might think. I’m sorry this is just starting to rattle on, I find it very hard to stay on topic though I do try my best. I just wish I had been open about my opposition right from the start, sadly I am guilty of assuming that it was obvious.. ah heck this is going arse over tit. I’ll stop here, No offense to you , I’m just tired and confuse easily. Good night to you .
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
Good night Aelfy, and I look forward to hearing your opinions when you feel less tired. You are not saying that millions of people deserve to be burned alive because of their religion, so you could not possibly cause any offence approaching that!
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
Somebody on this site says that all Jews in the world should be be burned alive, and what is the response from this whole community?… ABSOLUTELY NOTHING! You should ALL hang your heads in shame! The Holocaust could happen again if you pathetic, immoral lot had anything to do with it. I am absolutely disgusted.
Tom Pride, you are the most guilty of all. For ****’s sake have some guts and say what you really think.
Aelfy – you are the only person who emerges with any credit. Thank you.
LikeLike
Barry Davies said:
Finkfurst there is no point in trying to argue with a troll who will continue to post rubbish the more you answer him the longer he will go on and on because he is getting what he wants.
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
You really shouldn’t twist what I say. Now either you’re not as literate as you make yourself out to be (a BS fraud) or you’re a Canaanite Jew. I say this, because word twisting and of course lying comes naturally to Canaanite Jews.
I did not say that they SHOULD be killed, that is your lying emotive embellishment, I said that they will be killed and the decision to do so will not be mine.
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
FinkFurst is the troll, not me.
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
More emotive lying and twisting of what I said. I am beginning to wonder if you’re Tom Pride, as the same dissembling can be seen in your perverted comments.
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
My reply to your BS is below.
LikeLike
Aelfy Petra Nightentity said:
cynicism hopeless naivety pettiness sarcasm spite vindictiveness in other words thetruthnotdoctrine. As I said in many of my posts you are a Troll. And whilst it was fairly interesting to see you dig yourself even deeper into the hole you originally dug. You are what you are and the truth will ever out. I don’t Pity you for you are nothing without your rhetoric and sensationalism and nothing with it.. Many ignored your posts for they had nothing to do with the Topic,a few of us took up your goading, but like trying to get blood out of a stone nothing could stop your rantings,sense avoided you like the plague which your kind are becoming. This is my last post to you, you really are not even worthy of it. You perhaps may rub your hands together and say to yourself,aha!! I’ve won….Goodbye little one, your past and present will teach you the error of your ways and your future is as empty as the he heart of a tory politician.
LikeLike
overburdenddonkey said:
f f
you are a truly arrogant and ignorant human being, i have already told you that the root causes of events, like the many holocausts, et al, are 100% curable and gave you the names of those who do, you accused me of advertising, called me a nutter, and them charlatans ….as you ridiculed me for saying it, so for many reasons i stayed away from the subject, which means i held back my views on this subject… which has been very, very, restricting for me….but, now since we are on the subject i will reiterate….we are all born, sociable, cooperative, non-violent, and lovable…personally i would read their works, straight from sources and caution everyone to the distortions, which abound around their work, they also caution against this…alice miller, bob johnson (imv the best) and dorathy rowe….i will not debate their work, nor this post, as it is 100% in truth, it is take it or leave it…but if you want to help humanity heal, then this work is vital to do so, and the message of it, must be put out there….it is for those who are interested, to do their own research, and if necessary, their own healing…the cure does not involved rationalization conversations about how it is all in the past, and best forgotten, it is not best forgotten at all…warning to be cautious of it not happening, is useless, it must be cured…horrors continue to happen to this day… .
i have championed the work of alice miller for almost 30 yrs now, and i will continue to do so until i die…she was born in 1923 in piotrków trybunalski, poland…she escaped from the ghetto, and smuggled food back in to her parents and sister, obviously at great risk to herself….and was able to smuggle her mother and sister her out, her father was not so lucky though…. …
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
Barry – I couldn’t disagree more. I think foul views like those from thetruthnotdoctrine should be shown to be immoral by argument and exposure. Unfortunately, when so many people turn a blind eye it just gives people like him the impression that their nasty ideas are actually right.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
OBD – I think you’re getting me mixed up with somebody else. I’m sure I never accused you of advertising, or called you a nutter.
LikeLike
Aelfy Petra Nightentity said:
we are all born, sociable, cooperative, non-violent, and lovable??? No we are not!!! these are learned traits. If these traits are not taught we’re are no better than the animals who have to rely on their instincts. I cannot believe that you wrote this, have you been hiding under a stone all your life?
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
OBD – Have you read William Golding’s “Lord of the Flies”?
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
Not your decision??? Pathetic crap!! It IS YOUR DECISION to approve of the idea that millions of people should be burned alive because of their religion.
LikeLike
overburdenddonkey said:
f f
overburdenddonkey – 100% cure for FGM just by paying €20 to Dr Bob Johnson???? I’m sorry Mr Donkey, but to put it simply…. you are either a complete nutter or a complete charlatan.
Tom – I think you must now exclude overburdenddonkey for selling services on this discussion forum.
LikeLike
overburdenddonkey said:
f f
FinkFurst said:
October 14, 2013 at 1:28 pm
.
Tom – I think you must exclude overburdenddonkey for selling services on this discussion forum.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
OBD – Thanks for reminding me. It was a long time ago and I had forgotten. However, I was absolutely right, you WERE advertising the services of a charlatan or a nutter!
LikeLike
Aelfy Petra Nightentity said:
Can you expect anyone to remember everyone that they have posted answers to and to remember every post as well? If FinkFirst posted that then he is very very right about you. Perhaps a reborn Troll has come to join this discussion on anything other than what the original topic was. I shall now Ignore you and I hope that FinkFirst will do the same.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
P.S. It appears that Dr Bob Johnson is no longer claiming to be able to cure FGM for €20. That’s good, isn’t it?
LikeLike
overburdenddonkey said:
f f
i will add just this and only this and no more…
Click to access 176_16-18.pdf
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
OBD – Would you agree that it’s good that the false and unethical service YOU advertised (that Dr Bob Johnson can cure FGM for €20) is no longer being offered?
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
doctrinenottruth – It’s a new day, but exactly the same question to you:
Is it wrong to block all the exits from a synagogue full of Jewish families, then set it on fire? Yes or no, or you’re not bothered either way?
LikeLike
overburdenddonkey said:
f f
i never claimed that, you twisted my words, i said the emotional affects of it are curable….. not the physical affects, as you well know…dr bob johnson never claimed anything about curing the physical affects of FMG again your slant on things…you said above.. OBD – I think you’re getting me mixed up with somebody else. I’m sure I never accused you of advertising, or called you a nutter….i have shown you to be wrong…
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
OBD – Yes I know, I just told you I had forgotten. Apparently that silly little victory makes you happy. How pathetic!
…and if you STILL claim that the psychological effects of FGM can be cured by paying €20 to Dr Bob Johnson, then you are STILL a charlatan or a nutter!
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
It’s a new day and here’s a new question. Why do you continually repeat questions that have already been dealt with and answered? I know that you suffer with some kind of word blindness but that is not my problem.
LikeLike
Aelfy Petra Nightentity said:
thetruthnotdoctrine/overburdenddonkey same troll or two in tandem? Not worth your effort FinkFirst. They just go on and on twisting everything to suit themselves and get a great deal of enjoyment out of pushing your buttons. Mind you if by some miracle you get them to commit to anything,evidence springs to mind ah heck! me and my big fingers. 😉
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
No, you avoided answering it. Is it wrong – Yes or no? You only have to type one word, so what are you scared of?
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
I disagree, I think it IS worth the effort.
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
My views are nothing to do with it and your emotional immaturity is making you a mental cripple. This thread is now clearly above your mental capabilities. I think you should get back to the kitchen where you belong.
Furthermore what’s written in The Holy Scriptures are NOT ideas, nor are they MY ideas.
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
More unbalanced emotional BS and totally erroneous, for I did not say I approved or disapproved. You really aren’t cut out for this are you?
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
The Holy Scriptures say nothing of synagogues full of Canaanite Jewish families locked in and then set on fire. This idea is wholly your creation and all from your emotional immature mind.
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
As I said you suffer from word blindness or is it dyslexia?
LikeLike
overburdenddonkey said:
f f
the truth, is never a silly little victory, i feel no smugness, only regret that i have not convinced, you to read their works…you were trying to move on from that point and claim i said other things which i have not….if you really want to learn, as you claim that you do then read, their works, if not stay in your ignorance, take it or leave it….
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
The best definition of futility I have seen in quite a while. LOL
LikeLike
overburdenddonkey said:
ps f f
i never claimed the EMOTIONAL affects FGM could be cured by paying bob johnson 20 euro..you did…he does not charge for his work…he raises money by giving talks etc, so he does not need/have to charge for it….
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
OBD – “he does not charge for his work” – That is simply false. Look at his own web site FFS!
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
Thinking is not the issue. It’s what you’re thinking about that’s the issue and your head is full of nonsense, so nonsense is all you can think about. You then type your nonsense, most of it based upon brainwashed conditioning, into garbage comments.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
You ARE scared to answer. Why? Is it because you know it’s immoral?
LikeLike
overburdenddonkey said:
f f
he does workshops and conferences…but no one is excluded because they cannot pay….his other one to one treatments and group treatments are done…without charge…no money, don’t have to pay, he relies on the others honesty…which is the whole basis of truth trust and consent…look at his work FFS…
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
I have answered in my articles and in depth but I guess that you’re of the Twitter sound bite generation so anything in depth you’re probably going to struggle with.
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
Assumptions and errors – I wonder what your school reports used to say – doesn’t listen and must try harder I wouldn’t mind betting
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
OBD – So exactly what ARE you claiming the wonderful Dr Bob Johnson will do to cure FGM, if you now say he can’t cure the physical, psychological or emotional problems for the €20 he charges?
LikeLike
overburdenddonkey said:
aelfy
“Can you expect anyone to remember everyone that they have posted answers to and to remember every post as well?” well, it is as well that i can…
ps, the topic of this post is violence!
LikeLike
overburdenddonkey said:
f f
…OBD – So exactly what ARE you claiming the wonderful Dr Bob Johnson will do to cure FGM, if you now say he can’t cure the physical, psychological or emotional problems for the €20 he charges? you said he cured it for 20euro not i….
stop procrastinating and read his work all will become clear….
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
What kind of a sick, warped person would refuse to say whether it’s right or wrong to burn innocent men, women and children to death?
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
ODB – No, you are wrong again – HE says it on his web site, and you advertised that web site.
LikeLike
overburdenddonkey said:
f f
you’ll just have to believe what you want then, he offered a one day 4hr introductory workshop in dublin for..€10 unwaged, €20 waged, €50 institutions. €0- a few…note the €0-a few….not hundreds of £’s, but enough to cover his expense’s of/for doing it, it received rave reviews, as well….
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
I am not The Creator and I keep telling you that I am only His messenger – I make no decisions nor do I have an opinion other than God’s Will be done.
These people are of the Synagogue of Satan – people who say they are Jews, but are not.
Rev 2:9 I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are The Synagogue of Satan.
These people are not men, so are not members of mankind, they are hu-man – of the serpent, the Devil – The Tares.
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
I didn’t say cultures have no morals or morality, I said the exact opposite. I think you’re beginning to lose it.
LikeLike
overburdenddonkey said:
f f
it was also in july 2013…my comment was oct 2013…so it would have only been of benefit to a time lord!
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
OBD – So you were (and just did again!) not just advertising crap, it was OLD crap even then. That’s not to your credit!
Rave reviews? Are you kidding? Give me JUST ONE review from a woman who said he cured her FGM… I bet you can’t!
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
So because Jews are not human, it’s OK to kill them all? Is that what you’re saying?
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
By the way OBD – Do you agree with thetruthnotdoctrine that all Jews should be killed? If not, why are you not saying so right now?
LikeLike
overburdenddonkey said:
f f
nothing i say, is to my credit according to you….
i clearly said all emotional injuries caused by abuse are 100% curable….
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
You really are dyslexic. The Canaanite Jews ARE hu-man and it’s because they are hu-man, they are not part of mankind. The Chinese likewise are hu-man as are many blacks.
I am not going to be drawn by your emotive irrelvant requests for my opinion on the issue. What will be, will be and my views on it don’t matter. I am just telling you what is going to happen, and whether you like it or not is by the by.
LikeLike
overburdenddonkey said:
f f
can you not read, my main post to this tread above, it is very clear that i disagree with all forms violence….
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
Just as I thought – there were no rave reviews from people who were ‘cured’. So you were talking crap.
So how about your attitude to killing all the Jews in the world… Do you agree with thetruthnotdoctrine or not?
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
…but you can’t even bring yourself to criticise thetruthnotdoctrine for saying that all Jews should be killed???? Your principles are pathetically weak. You are a therefore a useless waste of space.
LikeLike
overburdenddonkey said:
p s f f
here is one review….http://www.thejournal.ie/profile/10485/the-work-bob-johnson-httpwww-1359326/
LikeLike
overburdenddonkey said:
f f
i already have condemned thetruthnotdoctrine’s views, on killing anyone including jews…if you could be bothered to read my posts
LikeLike
overburdenddonkey said:
p s f f
i refuse to discuss any other issues with you atm..as i have already previously stated in other blog posts….you have as usual offered no reasonable replies to my above posts in any of the issues raised…
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
You refuse??? Ah diddums, little kid OBD doesn’t want to play any more. GROW UP!!!
Oppose thetruthnotdoctrine’s views and I might start to think you have some guts. You care what I think, even though you will deny it.
LikeLike
Barry Davies said:
FinkFurst he clearly has religious delusions and by definition delusions are concrete and can not be altered by reality, only medication, or Electroconvulsive therapy could alter those evil views based on an illiterate understanding of whatever religious tome he is reading, considerd argument will not alter his outlook.
LikeLike
overburdenddonkey said:
barry
not true nothing is concrete it is software never hardware…ect is barbaric as ares meds…they all do more harm than good ie numb mind not cure mind…
http://dpac.uk.net/2014/01/sanity-in-an-era-of-rabid-capitalism-f-e-e-l-event-7th-february/#sthash.vreY6lVY.dpbs
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
I agree with OBD. Delusions are not concrete, but sometimes they can be tough! Medication is not the answer, but it can be helpful in the short term. As an atheist I would also argue that all religious beliefs are delusions, but mostly they’re pretty harmless. Unfortunately thetruthnotdoctrine is not in the harmless category.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
No, you have the problem. Mankind is a word meaning all Homo sapiens collectively, and so includes people of all religions and all skin colours. “Hu-man” is not an English word and is meaningless drivel. Try looking at a dictionary occasionally you moron!
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
I have no problems at all, you’re the one with the problems, because the Hebrew/Gaelic Hebrew/Old English word ‘hu’ means ‘serpent’, so a hu-man is a serpent man, a descendant of the Devil via Eve. I have no need of dictionaries in this instance. You though have a serious need of education.
LikeLike
Barry Davies said:
In common usage, the word “human” generally refers to the only extant species of the genus Homo — anatomically and behaviorally modern Homo sapiens. Its usage often designates differences between the species as a whole and any other nature or entity.
In scientific terms, the definition of “human” has changed with the discovery and study of the fossil ancestors of modern humans. The previously clear boundary between human and ape blurred, resulting in “Homo” referring to “human” now encompassing multiple species. There is also a distinction between anatomically modern humans and Archaic Homo sapiens, the earliest fossil members of the species, which are classified as a subspecies of Homo sapiens, e.g. Homo sapiens neanderthalensis.
The English adjective human is a Middle English loanword from Old French humain, ultimately from Latin hūmānus, the adjective form of homō “man”. The word’s use as a noun (with a plural: humans) dates to the 16th century.[11] The native English term man can refer to the species generally (a synonym for humanity), and could formerly refer to specific individuals of either sex. The latter use is now obsolete.[12] Generic uses of the term “man” are declining, in favor of reserving it for referring specifically to adult males. The word is from Proto-Germanic mannaz, from a Proto-Indo-European (PIE) root man-.
The species binomial Homo sapiens was coined by Carl Linnaeus in his 18th century work Systema Naturae, and he himself is the lectotype specimen.[13] The generic name Homo is a learned 18th century derivation from Latin homō “man”, ultimately “earthly being” (Old Latin hemō, a cognate to Old English guma “man”, from PIE dʰǵʰemon-, meaning “earth” or “ground”).[14] The species-name sapiens means “wise” or “sapient”. Note that the Latin word homo refers to humans of either gender, and that sapiens is the singular form (while there is no word sapien).
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
I think the Chaldee/Hebrew/Gaelic sort of predates all your unimpressive intellectualism and poor attempts at explaining away the Truth that ‘hu’ means ‘serpent’. Or was your comment supposed to bring something useful to the discussion?
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
Now you think it’s possible for a male reptile to mate with a female human and produce offspring? Would you care to describe how that would work, both anatomically and genetically?
LikeLike
Barry Davies said:
Hu (mythology), the deification of the first word in the Egyptian mythology of the Ennead
Huh (god), the deification of eternity in the Egyptian mythology of the Ogdoad
Hu (Sufism), a name for God
Hú, a kachina in Hopi mythology
Adir Hu, a hymn sung at the Passover Seder
Hu Gadarn, (Hu the Mighty) a Welsh legendary figure
HU, a mantra popularized by the religion Eckankar as a name for and love song to God
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
He was like nothing we know in this age and bestiality is nothing new.
These creatures will give you an idea:
Rev 4:6 And before the throne there was a sea of glass like unto crystal: and in the midst of the throne, and round about the throne, were four beasts full of eyes before and behind.
Rev 4:7 And the first beast was like a lion, and the second beast like a calf, and the third beast had a face as a man, and the fourth beast was like a flying eagle.
If you can tell me what these creatures are like then I’ll tell you what the serpent being was like before he was cursed to slithering in the dust.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
You’re the one who is claiming that it’s a fact, and you want ME to explain it to YOU? You are just telling silly stories which even a small child would know are ridiculous and impossible.
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
Looks like you’re missing the serpent description. That’s the problem when you use unreliable academic sources. They tend to leave out anything that might lead to uncomfortable information. You know, like racial interbreeding.
“Their temples wherein the sacred fire was preserved were generally situate on eminences and in dense groves of oak, because a circle was the emblem of the universe; oval, in allusion to the mundane egg, from which issued, according to the traditions of many nations, the universe, or, according to others our first parents; serpentine, because a serpent was the symbol of HU, the Druidic Osiris.”
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
I am giving you truthful information. I already know that Eve had sex with The Devil, I am just providing you with information to try and explain how it happened.
No, a small child would believe and that’s your problem.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
Bestiality is usually between a male human and some other mammal, so that’s irrelevant. You claim that a male reptile mated with a female human and produced offspring. Please explain how…
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
No, bestiality can be between a woman and a beast just as it can be between a man and a beast.
The Serpent creature was like nothing we know or have ever seen. That’s why I quoted Revelation in order to help you understand.
LikeLike
Barry Davies said:
You can’t miss something that is a figment of the imagination of a deluded fanatic, that is why there is no serpent reference. Racial interbreeding has happened through history, it isn’t uncomfortable to sensible people, only racists find it abominable. Now you claim it is druidic did you forget your nonsense about it being a Chaldee/Hebrew/Gaelic word.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
Yes, I said “usually”. Perhaps you need to look that word up in the dictionary too.
YOU are the one who is claiming inter-species mating and offspring, but you have absolutely no idea whether or how it’s even possible! Your explanations range from ridiculous to non-existent!
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
I make no claims, I have just quoted something that says otherwise. If you don’t like it, tough.
Hebrew/Gaelic was the language of the Druids. The Druids are the descendants of the Ancient Israelite Levitical preisthood.
Interracial breeding is uncomfortable to certain people who would rather it not become common knowledge and they hold sway over most of the world via banking and the media.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
“I make no claims” – Try reading a few of your own posts you moron!
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
I make no claims. You’re the people making the claims. I am telling you The Truth and being strangers to The Truth you don’t like what I say. You love to be lied to.
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
If you want to know, read my articles. If not then stop bitching.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
You’re not even capable of understanding your own words! You contradicted yourself in the very next sentence – Amazing!
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
For someone with dyslexia how did you work that out? LOL
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
You just contradicted yourself AGAIN! You’re not doing very well, are you?
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
If you’re saying I have contradicted myself then that must mean I haven’t, due to your whacky perverted logic and inability to read and comprehend.
If you stopped using your forehead for typing that would help a great deal. LOL
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
Whoosh!!!!
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
Have you yet found it in your personal morality to say that murdering Jews is wrong? That is very revealing about you, and the others who subscribe to your immoral sect.
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
I have no morality, morality is for people who need excuses to keep on sinning and ignoring their Creator.
Morality is like the legal system which has nothing to with The Law.
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
PS have you read the article yet, or are going to carry on like an ignorant troll?
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
Of course, I read every word! As you have no morality, that means you have no sexual morality? Is that correct?
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
So you have read it and now you’re changing the subject just like a devious woman would? Are you into witchcraft by any chance only I have this image of you on your broom?
What is it about my statement: “I have no morality” that you do not understand? Are you really that thick or do you put on an act?
I am led by The Holy Spirit so that makes me perfect in God’s sight.
If you can find a moral based system that can make you perfect and sinless, I would be glad to hear about it. I won’t be holding my breath in the meantime. LOL
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
…then I suggest you read what your bible has to say about morality (and sinners telling lies!) and think again!
Charles Crosby – the perfect man who will enthusiastically cast the first stone!
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
The words ‘moral’ and ‘morality’ are not in The KJ Bible, so it’s you who needs to think again, not me.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
You’re telling lies again! Naughty Charles – Go to the naughty step immediately!
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
Show me Chapter and Verse in the KJV where the words ‘moral’ and ‘morality’ can be found.
All Morals are man made, nothing more, nothing less.
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
PS I should also have said, put up or shut up.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
Look in the New KJV, and the ESV, and many other translations you moron!
Charles Crosby – the perfect man who will enthusiastically cast the first stone!
LikeLike
Ian clarke said:
Morals are man made just like all gods are man made LOL
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
Those versions are more corrupt than the KJV, I never use them. They are versions written by and for The Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion – counterfeiters.
Don’t waste your time discussing The Holy Scriptures, you’re not qualified. You would be like a road sweeper attempting brain surgery.
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
Atheism is a religion.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
Ha ha ha! You now deny the KJV after referring to it yourself many, many times! What a sad, stupid little hypocrite you are.
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
You said the New King James version. As I said, you’re out of your depth now and obviously illiterate.
LikeLike
Ian clarke said:
lol I like Thor the best of all fictitious Gods
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
Avoiding the question AGAIN! You say you are perfect, so you must know which is the least ‘corrupt’ bible. Which is it?
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
So you do believe in gods then? What else do you worship or idolise?
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
I avoid no questions and there is no perfect Bible, all are corrupted, but modern translations are more corrupt, which includes the two versions you mentioned.
LikeLike
Ian clarke said:
Maybe Spiderman would beat him hmn..Silver Surfer is another good one but you only have to separate him from his board and he’s toast man!
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
Lots of idols then? Quite religious aren’t we?
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
You can’t even read English!!!! I didn’t say “perfect”, I asked which is the LEAST ‘corrupt’? Come on – you say you are the perfect man who knows everything. Why can’t you answer?
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
Your troll like comments are undecipherable, and I have no idea what point you are trying to make. I think you should get professional help.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
I’ll try YET again. It’s a very simple question – Which version of the bible is the least corrupt in your opinion?
LikeLike
Ian clarke said:
Then again Thor could just smite him with his mighty hammer and knock him into next weeks edition
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
That’s an impossible question to answer as it would take several life times to go through all the versions to ascertain all the errors, but as a general rule of thumb it is a known fact that the older versions are less corrupt than the new i.e. The KJV and The Geneva Bible.
The NIV has at least 200 more corruptions in it than the KJV.
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
Whatever makes you happy.
LikeLike
Ian clarke said:
Aww thanks
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
An impossible question? But you just said that you are perfect! How can you not know the answer?
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
Perfect in terms of sinlessness and righteousness to enable me to have eternal life.
Gaining Spiritual maturity is something else and includes gaining more knowledge, but that has no bearing on perfection.
Perfection has nothing to do with all knowing. Only Yashua Messiah is all knowing.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
So the holy spirit forgot to tell the perfect man where to find the true word of god? How sad!
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
Not at all, for if there was no written Word as it was before the printing press i.e.approx 1500 years then believers were taught by Word of mouth and by The Holy Spirit directly.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
So the holy spirit talks directly to you, the perfect man, does it?
LikeLike
Barry Davies said:
And in the beginning was the word and the was Dog but a dyslexic scribe couldn’t spell it write and man made god in his own image because the dog could only bark. The scribes using hieroglyphs printed the word on walls and rocks, and the Jews took this God to be their own from which the christian and muslim religions emanated. Sorry for any truly religious people reading this but it is probably far closer to the truth than any of ttnd’s posts.
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
Of course, I wouldn’t be perfect otherwise.
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
You wouldn’t know The Truth if it were a piece of 4×2 whacking you across the forehead. LOL
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
“Of course, I wouldn’t be perfect otherwise.”
Then how does this holy spirit talk to you? In English words or in thoughts?
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
Inner thoughts to the perfect new man that was born at Baptism when the old man died in the watery grave.
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
Any time.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
If your holy spirit doesn’t use English words, then why are you so concerned about whether the word “morality” is or is not in the KJV bible?
How do you distinguish between your own thoughts and thoughts given to you by your holy spirit?
LikeLike
Ian clarke said:
cool
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
“Atheism is a religion”
No it isn’t! You’re having trouble with words again, aren’t you?
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
thetruthnotdoctrine – I think you don’t understand what the word “fictitious” means!
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
I’m not concerned about the word morality at all. You’re the one attaching value to that word, not me. I explained that it’s not a Scriptural word nor is it a word that God holds any value in.
Morals are man made standards, not God’s standards.
It’s not MY Holy Spirit, it’s God’s Holy Spirit which I have been gifted with. The Holy Spirit is a living power that enables me to know Yashua Messiah’s thoughts.
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
No
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
Atheism is a religion.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
You’ve spent a lot of time talking about a word which doesn’t concern you at all! So I think that means that is DOES concern you and you’re lying again!
How do you distinguish between your own thoughts and thoughts given to you by your(/god’s!) holy spirit?
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
Repeating things doesn’t make them true! Try looking in your dictionary for once.
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
No, I’ve wasted a lot of time on a waste of space like you, that’s what I’ve done, and I will soon bring it to an end unless you have something worthwhile to say.
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
You and your dictionaries. Pathetic.
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
I have to repeat them because you’re so thick. Two short planks come easily to mind in your case.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
If you’re going to use the English language to communicate, then it’s best to understand what English words mean, and not make up your own meanings!
Religion – “The belief in and worship of a superhuman controlling power, especially a personal God or gods”
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
How do you distinguish between your own thoughts and thoughts given to you by your(/god’s!) holy spirit? Surely you can tell the difference, can’t you?
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
The words of the English language have more than one meaning. The injustice system uses legalese – a completely different language in English. Were you even aware of that?
Re-Legion is the worship of a multifaceted demon called Legion. He can display himself in many many ways and atheism is just one of those ways. In fact anything or in anyway that deceives silly lemming people.
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
No, they are intwined in such a way now that the difference is no longer indentifiable. We’re talking 30 plus years now.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
That’s interesting! So any thought you have might be your own, it might be from your holy spirit, and it might be from the devil, and you just told the world that you can’t tell the difference!
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
It doesn’t matter that I can’t tell the difference, I am Born of God and getting more like Him each day – it’s called likemindedness.
Once more, it’s not MY Holy Spirit.
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
One thing I can tell, though, you’re definitely demon possessed or being influenced by a demon.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
Ahhhh – Now we’re getting there!!! I was wondering when you were going to resort to saying that I’m the devil/demon. That means you’re REALLY having problems with your arguments and silly beliefs now!
I have LOTS more questions for you! Are you ready or are you going to run away?
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
Of course you are, your behaviour is typical. Or is your vanity such that you think you’re the only one?
I will answer your further questions when you start answering mine.
LikeLike
Barry Davies said:
The Jews created Jehova the Christians decided that Jehova had a son and became christians whilst still having Jehova as their God and the Muslims similar evolved fro the hebrew religion with their religious teacher Allah but still worshipping the same god as the christians and the Jews, why any one of the subsidiary groups of those three groups thinks that the very same God would want them to kill each other, against his specific wishes, is beyond reason ant yet the religious maniacs do it all the time in the name of the same being. Lets be honest there were many gods around before this one so why on earth is (s)he more likely to exist than the gods who predated this vein?
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
OK, so you have just started your own religion. Go join their club. The Devil never says no to new members.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
I just said it’s best not make up your own meanings for English words!!!
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
I don’t, I research their alternative meanings and of course the knowledge Yashua Messiah imparts.
There is no such thing as a pure man made language – all are bastardised.
LikeLike
Barry Davies said:
So as I thought your understanding of religion is severely lacking you have no insight into how it emerged, and grasp desperately at the mediaeval concept of the devil, as such you believe in the devil and should be burned at the stake to ensure your journey to the afterworld.
LikeLike
thetruthnotdoctrine said:
Run along now, the fairies at the bottom of your garden are waiting for you or is it your favourite youtube numpty?
LikeLike
Barry Davies said:
Well according to the bible God made all the languages not man when he destroyed the tower of Babel, so are you calling your God a bastard?
LikeLike
Barry Davies said:
Oh dear TTND you stated that calling people names shows a lack of intelligence and that the person who acts in this manner lacks intellect and insight, when you were called a plunker, so now you call me a numpty, clearly by your own adage you are lacking in intellect, and insight which does explain the strange ramblings of your posts here.
LikeLike
overburdenddonkey said:
barry
thetruthnot, has no idea by whom and for what purpose the bible was written and what came before it….he knows nothing of pythagorean/druidic/chaldean wisdom, nor gnosis ie knowledge nor of the culdees…he believes that the search is in externalism, ie preaching, if he says it enough he will believe it, and others will be browbeaten into submission….he is just a clerk…a 2 legged milking stool…
LikeLike