(not satire – it’s the Lib Dems!)
Stephen Fenwick – a Liberal Democrat councillor in Sutton – has been found guilty of racially aggravated assault.
But despite the Lib Dems knowing that Fenwick had been due in court on racial assault charges since January – he only voluntarily resigned from the party yesterday:
And as if being a racist wasn’t bad enough – Fenwick’s also crooked, devious, conniving, and unscrupulous too.
He courted controversy last year when he suddenly changed his decision to vote against the council’s decision to grant planning permission to the controversial Beddington Lane incinerator (6th paragraph down):
Sutton Council grants planning permission to south London incinerator
But the councillor forgot to mention to anyone that he had just been given a job at the Department of Energy and Climate Change – which of course had nothing at all to do with his sudden change of heart:
.
Let’s hope in May the voters of Sutton let the Lib Dems know exactly what they think of this devious, conniving, unscrupulous racist.
.
Please feel free to comment.
.
gingerblokeblog said:
Reblogged this on gingerblokeblog.
LikeLike
nearlydead said:
Reblogged this on nearlydead.
LikeLike
rebelkathryn said:
So the LibDems has given us another self-serving tosser. Do they have an unlimited supply?
LikeLike
Darren said:
Sutton… As in “Sutton & Cheam” Isn’t that where a certain LimpDumb also sold out the locals over a hospital? If so, there needs to be a water quality check done in the area. Probably to ascertain if there’s any incinerator ash in it!
LikeLike
Pingback: Lib Dem guilty of racial assault - but party st...
Tom Pride said:
Yep, the very same – Paul Burstow.
LikeLike
Jeffrey Davies said:
they all lie they cheat most of all they will do anything to stay in power
LikeLike
beastrabban said:
Reblogged this on Beastrabban’s Weblog and commented:
Back in the 1980s there were a series of scandals when it was revealed that a number of German politicians in the Freie Demokraten – the Free Democrats, the German equivalent of the Liberal party, were actually Neo-Nazis, who had infiltrated the party. Now it seems that Stephen Fenwick is attempting to follow that Rightwing tradition of racial bigotry all by himself. I’d also say he was being cynical in allowing his personal self-interest to determine which way he votes on particular issues, but I’m afraid personal self-interest is the foundation of modern society in classical Liberal political theory.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
If being “crooked, devious, conniving, and unscrupulous” like Fenwick was a crime then most politicians of all parties would be in prison. Sadly, it’s actually a requirement of the job, whilst honesty and integrity are a guarantee of career failure.
LikeLike
guy fawkes said:
hear hear Fink – you would make a good politician wouldn’t you?
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
No, I would not make a successful politician. I answer every question put to me as honestly as I can. YOU DO NOT.
Do you still think – “It is common knowledge that gay men especially are promiscuous and predatory…”?
LikeLike
guy fawkes said:
Honestly? Yes!
LikeLike
Paul Smyth said:
Reblogged this on The Greater Fool.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
In the absence of facts then your opinion is simply homophobia. Do you have any facts?
LikeLike
guy fawkes said:
Do you have any facts that they are not what I say?
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
Clearly you have absolutely nothing to support your statement. You are therefore simply disgusting, bigoted, homophobic scum.
LikeLike
guy fawkes said:
I have I have told you repeatedly where to find it, but you obviously do not like the truth so have not looked, it is you who is devoid of the facts to back up your own rebuttal. I was going to reply with similar insults of you being a heterophobe or a
religious bigot but decided against it, because name calling is so childish.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
‘ have I have told you repeatedly repeatedly where to find it it’
It appears that Tom must have edited his archive and your ‘repeated’ references have all been deleted! Please tell me again where to find it…
LikeLike
guy fawkes said:
no!
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
You can’t come up with anything better than that? I guess homophobes are just as thick as racists. Sorry, I forgot that you’re one of those too!
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
I asked you a simple question – “Do you have any facts?” You could have given the honest answer “No”, but you are neither honest nor moral.
LikeLike
guy fawkes said:
I think you should get back in your cage, your teeth are showing!
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
You STILL can’t give an honest answer!
LikeLike
guy fawkes said:
I have given one, if you do not want to look for the evidence then that is your loss!
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
There is no evidence that gay men are more “promiscuous and predatory” than heterosexual (or bisexual) men. In spite of trying you have obviously been totally unable to find any, so your opinion is simple, crass homophobia.
I know what I think, and why, and I can explain it to anyone… whilst you are unable to even think about your own opinions. This isn’t about whether you or I appear to have ‘won’ an argument or had the last word, it’s about what’s inside your head. Your failure to understand that concept is truly your sadness and your loss.
LikeLike
guy fawkes said:
I am not arguing with an idiot like you on this subject any longer.
LikeLike
Thomas M said:
I suppose the Lib Dems thought if they threw him out, who would they find to replace him?
LikeLike
guy fawkes said:
ps I am not the one that needs to go looking for evidence I know exists, but which you deny exists. I have told you many times where the evidence is but you choose to deny it’s existence with “I know what I think and can explain it to anyone”. You can explain nothing! I unlike you am not trying to win an argument, I am stating what is the truth to which there is evidence you are just a bias homosexual probably bisexual.
LikeLike
jeffrey davies said:
well im off to put my bun in the oven no not that just my uncooked one be good otherwise they are winning jeff3
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
You still think calling somebody homosexual or bisexual is an insult! You really don’t get it, do you?
LikeLike
guy fawkes said:
Just putting forward a supposition of what your sexuality is, how is that an insult?
You protesteth too much.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
… because you intended it is an insult. The fact that you think in terms of “You protesteth too much” proves that you still think homosexuality is something to be ashamed of. In fact I have never protested about my sexuality because I have never said what it is. It’s your assumptions which tell the story!
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
P.S. You said you wouldn’t argue about this subject any more. Your memory is no better than your morals!
LikeLike