The sordid story of the geology professor, the fracking company, the old Etonian and the Tory Party fundraiser
When retired geophysics professor Dr David Smythe wrote a highly technical academic paper critical of fracking processes, he expected the usual questioning from academic colleagues that goes with peer reviewed academic publications.
What he didn’t expect was to see his academic reputation smeared in two national newspapers.
The Telegraph and the Daily Mail – not publications normally interested in micrite layers of subsurface geology – both ran bizarre smear stories claiming Smythe had ‘fabricated’ his qualifications.
The ‘fabrications’ boiled down to the non-story that on his retirement, Smythe had not renewed his subscriptions to membership of the Geological Society.
Dr Smythe was even more surprised to see a colleague from his alma mater Glasgow University – a prof Paul Younger – widely quoted in the newspaper articles, fiercely criticising him for supposedly ‘lying’ about his academic credentials and calling him a “fraud”.
Undeterred, in January this year, Smythe continued his research into fracking and went on to produce another highly technical academic publication which was also critical of fracking processes.
This time the reaction was different but just as ferocious.
Without warning or explanation, Glasgow University suddenly blocked Smythe’s online access to the banks of data he needed for further research, after 17 years of trouble-free access.
It is a devastating and unprecedented move to make against an academic involved in research – effectively barring him from producing any more studies into fracking.
Internal university emails showed the person responsible for the move to bar Smythe from his research was also a prof Paul Younger – in his position as Rankine Chair of Energy Engineering at Glasgow University.
So who is Professor Paul Younger?
Unfortunately for Dr Smythe, Younger doesn’t just have an academic interest in fracking processes.
He also happens to be on the very lucrative payroll of a company called Cluff Geothermal – an energy company highly involved in fracking.
In fact, Younger has not only received grants from at least two major fracking companies, he is also listed as a director of Cluff.
But even an average energy company – as rich as it might be – would not normally have the clout to persuade two national newspapers to run baseless smear stories against a respected academic.
Cluff Geothermal, however, is not just any gas and oil exploration company.
Cluff was founded by a very influential Tory Party fundraiser and former close friend of Margaret Thatcher – an oil executive called Algy Cluff.
And Cluff’s co-founder is a young man called George Percy.
What the Cluff website doesn’t say is that Percy is in fact Earl George Dominic Percy – an old Etonian and close friend of the royal family and heir to the Duke of Northumberland estate. Here he is with Prince William and pals:
So it seems, Smythe has made some extremely powerful enemies in very, very high places indeed – and is now paying dearly for it.
But it is extraordinary that in today’s Britain, academic research can be silenced simply because the results may be inconvenient to the business interests of aristocrats, the rich or the powerful.
.
You can contribute to David Smythe’s legal fight to regain access to data so he can continue his research here.
And his personal website can be seen here.
Pauline Cory said:
Nice one, well done for exposing this!
LikeLiked by 1 person
sheenaghpugh said:
Is he suing for libel?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Jeffrey Davies said:
money talks to greedie people they wont worry if the earth is polluted
LikeLiked by 1 person
snaithmagmailcom said:
Reblogged this on michaelsnaith.
LikeLike
Philmo said:
Great expose of the dirty tricks vested interests engage in – especially the greedy wealthy ones! Dr Smythe won’t be the first or last to let his professional subscription lapse on retirement but it certainly won’t affect the validity of his practical academic output, regardless of his retirement from employ at an academic establishment. We expect nothing less from DM and Torygraph but anticipate a more respectful attitude from fellow academic, prof Paul Younger, clearly speaking with vested interest of his own and that of his chums! Shameful behaviour! Incredible what lengths greed will drive to these days.
LikeLike
Richard Burnham said:
Any connections with Matt Ridley, do you know?
LikeLike
flamingjulie said:
He has an excellent case. And he was the original bass player for the Rezillos!
LikeLike
alice moore said:
Thanks for drawing this to people`s attention. We have always known about politicians and vested interests but It`s a sad day when scientists cannot be trusted and will slander a colleague for the sake of a research grant. And from a fracking company, of all things.
This needs further exposure. Reblogged.
LikeLike
Neil Pitcairn said:
Thanks for the research. Link reposted on https://greenwire.greenpeace.org/uk/en-gb/groups/fracking.
LikeLike
Pingback: How a fracking company is silencing academic criticism with smears and payoffs | Pride’s Purge | Vox Political
Pingback: Extraordinary story of how a fracking company is silencing academic criticism with smears and payoffs | wgrovedotnet
mohandeer said:
Reblogged this on Worldtruth.
LikeLike
Pingback: Extraordinary story of how a #fracking company is silencing academic criticism with smears and payoffs | Pride’s Purge | sdbast
mycroft212b said:
Unable to contribute to the fund as the links do not work. Neither name nor payment details are able to be made. Please sort this as we all need, if able, to contribute to fighting this gross corruption.
LikeLike
mariannewildart said:
There is another unspoken aspect to this … The nuclear industry have Nasty BIG reasons to silence independent criticism from geologists and Prof Paul Younger is of course a nuclear advocate https://mariannewildart.wordpress.com/2016/08/17/dewilding-cumbria/
LikeLiked by 1 person
mariannewildart said:
Reblogged this on Radiation Free Lakeland and commented:
The smear campaign against Professor David Smythe has another unspoken aspect … The nuclear industry have Nasty BIG reasons to silence informed dissenters and to block independent scientific criticism from geologists. The chief architect of the smear campaign, Prof Paul Younger is of course a nuclear advocate.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pingback: Extraordinary story of how a nuclear industry and fracking company is silencing academic criticism with smears and payoffs – Radiation Free Lakeland | AGR Daily News Service
John Watson said:
How can a university of the standing of Glasgow allow someone as obviously biased as Prof.Younger to carry on in such a senior position. How can he approach his role as a lecturer to give a balanced and unbiased analysis of this subject when he is so openly and obviously totally in support of fracking and prepared to abuse his position to silence any alternative view. Shame on him and shame on Glasgow University.
LikeLiked by 1 person
vondreassen said:
they’re all in it together….
LikeLike
hilw3 said:
Reblogged this on hilarywhitehead.
LikeLike
Mark said:
If someone were to start an online petition to have Pro Younger sacked for professional misconduct I’d vote for it.
LikeLike
Michelle said:
Related info – Paul Mobbs and his ‘Frackademics map’ with the interrelationships between academics, public institutions and government.
LikeLike
Michelle said:
And here’s the related info link of the Frackademics map: http://www.fraw.org.uk/mei/archive/fracktured_accountability/frackademics.shtml
LikeLike
flyingcuttlefish said:
Very good story!
LikeLike
Dawn love said:
Cluff energy also involved in UCG ‘ trials’ in north east England – http://www.fraw.org.uk/mei/musings/2015/20150403-ucg_hell_fires.html
LikeLike
paulh121 said:
Reblogged this on paulh121.
LikeLike
Pingback: Extraordinary story of how a fracking company is silencing academic criticism with smears and payoffs | eclectictaste18
liz3321 said:
It’s not unprecedented for universities and establishment organisations to attempt to silence scientists. Arpad Pusztai’s experiments with a GM potato found adverse changes in the animals which consumed it. False information was used to discredit the experiments, and the editor of the Lancet reports being threatened by a scientist from the Royal Society over his decision to publish. Pusztai’s data were confiscated, and his department was dismantled so that he couldn’t follow up the research.
Genetically modified foods and the Pusztai affair
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1115659/
Only one of the peer reviewers was against publication, and the editor or the Lancet, Richard Horton wrote of the “the reckless decision of the Royal Society to abandon the principle of due process in passing judgment on their work.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
liz3321 said:
For medicine, the cosy links between industry and governments, regulatory bodies and doctors/scientists were highlighted by Dr Marcia Angell, former editor of the New England Journal of Medicine in her 2004 book The Truth about the Drug Companies: How They Deceive Us and What to Do about it She wrote “This industry uses its wealth and power to co-opt every institution that might stand in its way, including the U.S. Congress, the Food and Drug Administration, academic medical centers and the medical profession itself. . . . It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgement of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of The New England Journal of Medicine. Things have got worse rather than better since then but drug companies are not the only offenders.”
Dr Richard Horton Editor of the Lancet, and Richard Smith, Editor of the British Medical Journal have written similarly.
The influence of corporate funding for academic institutions in any sphere of science is liable at best to produce biased results, and at worst to suppress science that does not support industries’ financial interests.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Anna said:
Actually it is not extraordinary, it is more in line with what’s happening in this country, the rich do whatever they do and seems to go unpunished
LikeLike
Glenn said:
Well done in exposing this. Only an imbecile would believe fracking is beneficial to the people on an island as small as ours.
LikeLiked by 1 person
miningawareness said:
Reblogged this on Mining Awareness + .
LikeLike
Michelle said:
hi Glenn, yes, we are a very small island and already have enough to cope with over at Sellafield without fracking our geological strata, imagine how small GB will feel if the potential fracking gets underway less than 30 miles from Sellafield in Cumbria!
Potential fracking and licences offered: http://frack-off.org.uk/region/north-west/
State of Sellafield – “Shocking state of world’s riskiest nuclear waste site. Huge pools of mystery sludge, leaking silos and risk of explosions: Sellafield needs help, but the UK government has just sacked the firm running the clean-up”
Ref: https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg22530053-800-shocking-state-of-worlds-riskiest-nuclear-waste-site/
LikeLike
Christina MacPherson said:
Reblogged this on nuclear-news.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pingback: Sordid story of how a fracking company is silencing academic criticism with smears and payoffs | Mining Awareness + | AGR Daily News Service
mbrysonb said:
Wow. Imagine how the press would react if a climate scientist cut off a “skeptical” scientist’s access to data… Why hadn’t I heard of this until today?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Michelle said:
Apart from fracking interests Algy Cluff is also busy suggesting to Theresa May (reported 25th Aug 16) that offshore wind farm subsidies should be cut because they will hinder his further exploration for gas in the NE sea, I guess climate change is a forgotten inconvenience:
https://www.energyvoice.com/oilandgas/north-sea/117533/cluff-sounds-prime-minister-north-sea-revival/?
LikeLiked by 2 people