Tags
A letter has been posted on Facebook revealing the UK Foreign Office has not designated the recent Paris attacks as terrorism – so as to avoid paying out compensation to victims:
Is the UK – apart from ISIS itself – the only state in the world which has not yet decided the Paris attacks were an act of terrorism?
Two glasses said:
Obviously applications for the Paris attacks are still being processed. It wasn’t very long ago so it’s just normal slow government bureaucracy. Nothing to get worked up about. However, the list of designated valid earlier acts from gov.uk seems to be remarkably short:
————————————————————————–
Terrorist acts you can claim for
You can currently claim for these terrorist acts:
hostage crisis at In Amenas, Algeria (16 January 2013)
kidnap of Setraco employees in Jama’are, Nigeria (16 February 2013)
attack at the Westgate shopping mall in Nairobi, Keyna (21 September 2013)
attack at the Bardo National Musum in Tunis, Tunisia (18 March 2015)
attack at Port el Kantaoui near Sousse, Tunisia (26 June 2015)
————————————————————————–
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pingback: Paris attacks not designated as terrorism by UK government – to save money? | Pride’s Purge | Vox Political
sdbast said:
Reblogged this on sdbast.
LikeLike
laurettalottiepearson said:
They know no bounds!
LikeLike
Josephine Mackenzie said:
They know nothing!
LikeLike
beastrabban said:
Reblogged this on Beastrabban’s Weblog and commented:
This is a government that seems keen to exploit the emotional impact of the threat of terrorism, while it seems being blithely indifferent to the same threat when it comes to shelling out money. The other day I reblogged a piece from the ‘Gabriel Vents’ blog, where the good Mr Gabriel cast his baleful eye on the recent iniquities of the present government. Amongst the various acts of misgovernment he listed was the way the Conservatives are cutting back on the nuclear police, military police and one of the other police forces at Devonport. So obviously not worried about a terrorist attack on British military installations, or the danger that they could deliberately set off a nuclear disaster. Well, so long as the prevailing wind carries the fallout away from Chipping Norton and Eton, why should Cameron and the rest of the toffs care?
But they do care about profit. Deeply. And from their perspective, the current war on terror is good for business. Hence Cameron has toured Saudi Arabia and other parts of the Middle East, selling dictators and despots armaments they don’t need and can’t use. But it makes them rich.
Disgusting.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Bruce said:
Well, it was “terrorism,” but not an attack – evidence shows this was probably Gladio State Terror, a little after Paris came out as a member of the UN “Strong Cities Initiative.
LikeLike
Larry Semmins said:
Erm could that letter be fake ?
LikeLike
Two glasses said:
Larry – It must be true, because it’s in the Daily Mail:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3403054/Traumatised-British-Paris-hostage-hid-three-hours-Bataclan-refused-help-told-not-victim-terror-attack.html
LikeLike
nick clegg said:
piss
LikeLike