Tags
(not satire – it’s the Daily Mail!)
Of course, the Daily Mail never likes Labour leaders.
But in all the years of watching politics, I have never before seen such vitriolic and personal attacks on a Labour leader – and even his family – that we have been seeing from the Daily Mail recently (warning – link to Daily Mail dross):
Miliband’s wife tells of fury after meeting ‘unattached’ Ed
In fact, the attacks are so personal I’m even starting to think the unthinkable.
Could it be because Ed Miliband is Jewish?
Don’t be so naive to think there aren’t still members of the British establishment who really really hate the idea of somebody with a Jewish background being Prime Minister.
And after all, Rothermere and his newspaper the Daily Mail have a shameful history of anti-Semitism.
In the 1930s, the newspaper supported Hitler as well as Oswald Mosley and his British Union of Facists.
Here’s Lord Rothermere – the great-grandfather of the present owner – with a good friend of his:
.
And here are extracts from an exchange of letters between the Mail’s owner and Hitler:
Adolf Hitler letter to Lord Rothermere (7th December, 1933)
I should like to express the appreciation of countless Germans, who regard me as their spokesman, for the wise and beneficial public support which you have given to a policy that we all hope will contribute to the enduring pacification of Europe. Just as we are fanatically determined to defend ourselves against attack, so do we reject the idea of taking the initiative in bringing about a war. I am convinced that no one who fought in the front trenches during the world war, no matter in what European country, desires another conflict.
Lord Rothermere, telegram to Adolf Hitler (1st October, 1938)
My dear Fuhrer everyone in England is profoundly moved by the bloodless solution to the Czechoslovakian problem. People not so much concerned with territorial readjustment as with dread of another war with its accompanying bloodbath. Frederick the Great was a great popular figure. I salute your Excellency’s star, which rises higher and higher.
But the Mail and its owner were not only supporters of Hitler – in the 1930s the newspaper was also itself openly and rabidly anti-Jewish.
Here’s an article showing what the Mail thought about Jews just one year before Britain was at war with Germany:
.
And of course, we all know the Daily Mail wrote a detailed article praising the UK’s version of Hitler’s Nazi Party – “Hurrah for the Blackshirts”.
But there’s more. The Daily Mail serialised the anti-Semitic hoax ‘The Protocols of the Elders of Zion‘ – a good ten years or so after it had been revealed to be a forgery.
Unfortunately though, this is not all in the newspaper’s past.
Just three years ago, Lord Rothermere’s newspaper supported another far-right European anti-semitic party – the Front National in the 2012 French elections.
And as recently as this month, the Mail wrote an article praising a rising far-right fascist group in Germany whose leader likes to dress up as Hitler.
Are we really to believe that the present Lord Rothermere – like his relatives – doesn’t realise how anti-semitic those parties are?
Of course, it’s just possible that Rothermere has had a sudden change of heart and has reversed decades of family tradition by suddenly loving all things Jewish.
Or maybe not.
.
Please feel free to comment and share. Thanks.
.
The Coalition Government Colouring and Activity Book is now available for download as a PDF and in print:
Uncle Erebus said:
Rothermere should be put into a cage and burnt.
LikeLike
Bernie Hepplewhite said:
Food for thought …..
Sent from my iPhone
>
LikeLike
Smiling Carcass said:
Reblogged this on SMILING CARCASS'S TWO-PENNETH and commented:
Typical media brainwashing through subliminal messaging; the headline suggests something unsavoury, the actual text reveals that Ed was at his current girlfriend’s party when he met his future wife. Duh?!
But they have planted the seed of sexual depravity with the headline, and the ambiguous references in the article will not shake the initial impression given to most people- that he is somehow unwholesome.
Now, I’m not a lover of ‘Red’ Ed- he’s far too blue for my liking, but get very annoyed when the media uses these techniques to sway public opinion.
LikeLike
Pingback: Unthinkable? Could Lord Rothermere’s vitriolic attacks on Ed Miliband be because he’s Jewish? | Alternative News Network
gingerblokeblog said:
Reblogged this on gingerblokeblog.
LikeLike
beastrabban said:
Reblogged this on Beastrabban’s Weblog and commented:
Tom Pride bases his question not only on the Daily Mail’s history of supporting Hitler, promoting the BUF and the infamous anti-Semitic forgery, the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, but also on its recent support for far-right parties such as the Front National in France and Pegida in Germany.
The paper’s attacks on Miliband and immigrants is ironic, considering that the Harmsworth family also consider themselves outsiders. They’re Irish in origin, who also have a history of colonisation and subjugation by the British. In the 19th century racial theorists decided that Gaels, like the Irish and Highland Scots, were the least ‘evolved’ of Europe’s peoples. Some went even further, and decided that they were even lower on the racial scale that Blacks.
My guess is that Rothermere’s anti-Semitism, if it exists, is selective. Jews are all right, so long as they’re like Michael Howard and support the Tories. If they support Labour and show solidarity with the rest o of the hoi polloi, then all the prejudices begin to show.
And even if the Harmsworth family aren’t anti-Semitic, they show all the class prejudices and hatreds of the British aristocracy against immigrants and commoners. Of course, in the 1930s the British aristocracy also thought very highly of Adolf Hitler, so even without anti-Semitism, we’re back to the question of Nazi sympathies again.
LikeLike
Elle Em said:
I wonder if that is true. How low can they sink and how utterly despicable.
LikeLike
sdbast said:
Reblogged this on sdbast.
LikeLike
Facey Romford said:
Though it might be pushing it a little far, I rather wondered at the time about the semiotics of the ‘bacon sandwich’ incident.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Chris said:
The politicians will be worse than ever before, in the usual personal character assasinations, as election gets closer and closer.
No big party won in 2010. The bulk of people did not vote.
No single party will ever again rule the UK parliament.
We face hung parliaments forever, where no party reaches the threshold of minimum required of 323-326 MPs to form a UK government.
As most voting areas where the so-called big parties won, had the bulk of voters not voting for any party, then the fight is a bruising neck and neck.
TORY / LABOUR / GREEN CHASING THE SAME MIDDLE CLASS AND ABOVE VOTERS
All income levels are not voting.
But the poor are the 75 per cent of all voters today and they will not vote for any party, as they believe small parties are a wasted vote.
NO SUCH THING AS A SMALL PARTY
ONLY PARTIES OF THE POOR OF THE LEFT
CAN BRING THE VOTERS OUT TO VOTE
TUSC – 134 MP candidates and 1000 councillor candidates
CLASS WAR – about 12 MP candidates
SOCIALIST GB – about 10 MP candidates
THE LEFT UNITY PARTY – about 10 MP candidates
THE NATIONAL HEALTH ACTION party – about 13 MP candidates
ONLY THESE PARTIES OF THE POOR OF THE LEFT
CAN UNSEAT AND REDUCE TORY AND LIB DEM MPS IN ENGLAND
The SNP and Plaid Cymru and Mebyon Kernow in Cornwall can reduce Tory and Lib Dem MPs.
But to really reduce Tory and Lib Dems MPs needs voters to come out in those voting areas and vote for the parties of the poor of the left.
LABOUR HAS ALREADY LOST
Labour only got around 250 seats in 2010, when the threshold needed is 326 MPs to rule UK government.
Labour will be reduced by SNP and Plaid Cymru to around 190 MPs.
TORIES WILL STAY IN POWER
With too few MPs from any big party, the Tories are required to stay in power in a Caretaker Government.
ONLY VOTING CAN SAVE US FROM A
TORY CARETAKER GOVERNMENT AND / OR A
SECOND GENERAL ELECTION WHEN WE GET A
TORY / LABOUR COALITION
We face permanent austerity and the danger to life that means, if we do not come out and vote the parties of the poor of the left on Thursday 7 May.
LikeLike
overburdenddonkey said:
chris
your figures are wrong labour are on for 277 seats, in fact more than the tories @ 264…
https://yougov.co.uk/news/2015/04/09/numbers-are-clear-labour-narrowly-ahead/
the snp are on for 53/4 seats…
LikeLiked by 1 person
bobchewie said:
sclaimer :
Pegida UK Admin team makes every effort to remove, foul, racist, offensive, threatening, bigoted, pornographic, comments and scences that are too graphic to be displayed on social media sites, there are to many people who may find these subjects offensive. However if you choose to view images which are marked with a warning we hold no responsibility.
However some material will be missed that members of the group post, but we will if alerted to them, remove them immediately.
Pegida is a non racist non violent group
You did mention pegida now has Uk support?
LikeLike
Jonathan Wilson said:
But for the real “funny” just click on “best rated” comments… The DM readership is very quick to turn on the DM when it thinks its just taking the piss and being fucking stupid in its articles. Its seen a set of personal attacks, and the “dead disabled child” wheeled out by “samcam” to win votes, and its not happy at such low-brow and disgusting tactics.
Dare I say it, but the line of attack by the S*n and the DM is doing Ed a world of good publicity. Wooops Linton Crosby will be running off to count his tax avoided earnings in the Cayman Islands while Camorons ratings tank.
LikeLiked by 1 person
bobchewie said:
Disclaimer: we are not racist it’s just that we don’t like dark foreigners and anyway we are looking out for the white man
That’s the current trend on far right parties
LikeLike
concernedkev said:
We have not seen the worst yet Crosbey has not got started yet. Rothermere’s 1 Zinoviev letter equivalent is yet to come. Probably two days before the election a major lie will be told without sufficient time to disprove or counter and like McDonald in 1924 Labour will lose majority
LikeLike
bobchewie said:
Or some politician will get bumped off and they will blame ISIS or something
LikeLike
Ben said:
While there may be an element of thinly veiled antisemitism in the constant attacks on Ed Miliband, (such as the bacon sandwich thing, and the nudge-nudge wink-wink talk of “North London intellectuals”), I think it has more to do with a very real fear that the papers doing the smearing will lose some of their influence should Labour win. They’ve spent 5 years telling their readers how useless he is, how weird, how the unions pull his strings, and now it turns out people haven’t fallen for it. So they’re getting desparate
LikeLike
patricknelson750 said:
It seems that in many people’s eyes the crime of Ed Miliband is less his Jewish heritage than his olive skinned eastern looks. As such an attitude is unacceptable in modern Britain it gets covered up with claims that their dislike of Ed Miliband is because he is an “intellectual” or a “nerd”, but no one seems to mind that at least a third of British politicians are quite definitely intellectuals and nerds, just one of them.
LikeLike
hilary772013 said:
OMG! There is more to this than meets the eye, I wonder how deep this runs even in the current government for example “MAKE WORK PAY” a Tory favourite and these were the exact phrase over the entrance to the death camp. Hitler started his campaign by vilifying the weak and disabled and later put them into institutions & later euthanised them. He accomplished this by constantly attacking them in his speeches until his rhetoric was believed by the masses (Sound Familiar?)
He then turned his rhetoric against the Jews and we all know know that ended.
I am not suggesting for one minute that our current government would go that far but it is frightening nonetheless.
LikeLike
bobchewie said:
He doesn’t appeal to dumbed down British it seems
LikeLike
stewilko said:
Reblogged this on stewilko's Blog.
LikeLike
artmanjosephgrech said:
so you have just worked this one out amazing ! His other crimes according to the Right wing establishment First general born immigrant, is on the left and has principles/ There is already a plot brewing should he gain an outright mandate or joining the the SNP in changing how the UK is governed
LikeLike
Pingback: ‘Backstabber’ is an historical antisemitic insult: Tory campaign turns nasty | Pride's Purge
A6er said:
Reblogged this on Britain Isn't Eating.
LikeLike
Pingback: Russell Brand doorsteps Daily Mail owner Lord Rothermere to ask him about his tax arrangements | Pride's Purge
Pingback: Tory candidate: I will never support ‘the Jew’ Miliband | Pride's Purge
patricknelson750 said:
Reblogged this on patricknelson750 and commented:
With a high percentage of his critics Ed Miliband’s greatest (unstated) crime is to look like a Jew, with some others it may be simply that he is Jewish…
LikeLike
bobchewie said:
Election 2015: Boris Johnson and Ed Miliband TV clash – http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-2015-32471755
BORIS PLAYS THE BACK STABBER CARD TO MILLIBAND
LikeLike