(warning – these statements are disturbing)
Read the original court statement here.
A judge in the US has ordered sex allegations against Prince Andrew be struck from the court records – not because they were found to be untrue but because they were deemed to be ‘unnecessary” to the case being tried.
Lest these allegations be lost, and in the interests of openness, here is the part of the witness statement from the US which names Prince Andrew:
The original statement can be seen in full here:
And this court document from the same case shows that the girls involved in the allegations were sometimes as young as 12 years old:
.
Please feel free to share. And comment.
Pride's Purge 
And now kincorra revelations proving that it was a VIP child abuse network after all and to think that number ten set up enquiry on kincorra to silence it all as well
LikeLiked by 2 people
Cabinet meeting November 1983 shows that number ten wanted the kincorra enquiry to ” silence all these rumours ” after having a report in 1982 that ” sexual misconduct ” had been taking place at Kincorra and that it’s cheifs concern was blackmail affecting security operations
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pingback: Read the original US court statement which names Prince Andrew in sex allegations | Alternative News Network
Reblogged this on sdbast.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on BertieS.
LikeLike
Jeremy Hunt said he wished he could take the NHS out of the political arena.
Wonder why
LikeLike
http://www.brusselsblog.co.uk/people-we-should-listen-to/ + a letter from him to the recent horizon prog… please also see a vid presented by prof joe sim.. punishment; a failed social experiment…see the work of dr bob johnson under solutions section…
LikeLike
I saw this on the news. The newscaster wrongly suggested that Jane Doe No 3 was looking to sue Epstein. That could have been a genuine mistake on his part, of course. The removal of his name has not been kept quiet but neither has it made any inroads to his potential guilt either. The action itself was a LONG time coming and it was thought he we either not be specifically named or that there would be a ban on releasing it. It was reassuring that they could not prevent it but obviously sufficient muscle has now been flexed to have his name removed. Royals 1. Justice 0…
LikeLike
quakers get this slang name by being angry, disturbed, upset etc when warranted ie quaking…’take the quaker down’ said a court official, the name stuck…and see no problem with these natural emotions…feeling make word…and keep one’s mind free and clear, bottled up emotions (anger and rage) bad for health… being disturbed @/by any abuse is emotionally healthy…in those disturbances healing and action to alleviate sufferings is accessed…
do we walk on by and ignore our sufferings/collective sufferings or act to cure them…. ?
LikeLike
rather disturbing stuff–it leads me to ask the following question in the hope you or someone else can answer it for me–I ASK IT BECAUSE AS YET I DON’T KNOW ENOUGH TO KNOW IF THIS IS REAL–is all this about “prince” Andy linked in any way to something about an arrest warrant issued for our notorious “queen” on charges of abuse? What is this about?–as yet I don’t know enough to know the answer to this–can someone answer it for me?
LikeLike