(not satire – it’s the UK press)
In an extraordinary article today – the Guardian’s so-called ‘reader editor’ Stephen Pritchard admits the newspaper will delete any readers’ comments which “persistently” criticise its journalists.
Pritchard rounds off his extremely defensive piece with this extraordinary sentence:
“….while we acknowledge criticism of the articles we publish, we will not allow persistent misrepresentation of our journalists.”
In other words, for “persistent misrepresentation” read “criticism“‘
Which at least explains why for several years now I have been banned (not pre-moderated – banned) from commenting on the Guardian website and my polite enquiries as to why I have been banned have been consistently ignored:
So now I know.
Because while I don’t use degrading, sexist or racist language, I do take a pretty persistent line in criticism of journalists from all mainstream newspapers- including the Guardian:
etc etc etc
In fact in my experience – for people who like to dish it out regularly to everyone else – mainstream media journalists have extremely thin skins.
Just dare to question many mainstream media hacks and they are the most likely to jump up and down threatening libel at the drop of a hat.
By far the most threats of libel and attacks I have had have been not from politicians – who in my experience on the whole tend to take criticism with a pinch of salt – but from journalists:
It seems hacks like to dish it out – but can’t take it back.
Please feel free to share. And comment.
The Coalition Government Colouring and Activity Book is now available for download as a PDF and in print: