(satire?)
EXCLUSIVE to Pride’s Purge: Andrew Mitchell’s court statement at the plebgate libel trial which the trial judge described as “inconsistent“:
.
Related articles by Tom Pride:
I have a dream: that white van man and black cab man can live together in harmony
Stars unite to raise money to help Myleene Class fight the deadly mansion tax
George Osborne promises “proper naughty” economy after hiring Dapper Laughs
Theresa May Announces Critical Thinking To Become Class C Drug
.
Please feel free to share. And comment:
Pride's Purge 
Reblogged this on sdbast.
LikeLike
Pingback: EXCLUSIVE – Andrew Mitchell’s previously unreleased court statement on plebgate: | Alternative News Network
Reblogged this on gingerblokeblog.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Beastrabban’s Weblog.
LikeLike
Them downing gate rozzers ‘ave gone an’ got old Whippersnapper Andy Pandy-Wandy right stitched up like a proper kipper, well done up, taken to the cleaners good ‘n proper, M’Lord. Serves ‘im proper right, M’Lord, for takin’ The Mickey Bliss an’ givin’ The Law much bad grief callin’ Her Maj’s Loyal Servants proper ‘effin’ plebs’ — You know what I mean, like??
LikeLike
Cheap shot. Clearly some people wanted rid of Mitchell. Mr Justice Mitting’s judgement is clearly flawed. Inconsistencies between what was in the notebook and the length of the video footage too, mean Mitchell should appeal. For Mitting to imply that Rowland, an officer with some length of service in the diplomatic protection unit, was too stupid and too much of a pleb to have ever even heard the word ‘pleb’ beggars belief. The only lesson to be learned is that juries should always be used in libel trials. When did the law change to abolish jury trials in libel cases?
LikeLike