(not satire – it’s the UK today!)
Allegations of sex crimes by leading members of the establishment – including paedophilia – are being kept secret from the public until at least the year 2056.
Here’s an example. Documents relating to allegations against a ‘peer of the realm‘ will not be released until at least the year 2043:
.
And why has the government decided to keep these documents secret until at least the year 2056:
Could the Diplomatic Service employee Colin Peters mentioned above be the same Diplomatic Service employee Colin Peters who was later jailed for sexually abusing children and is linked to the current Operation Fernbridge police investigation into allegations of child sexual abuse by leading members of the establishment?
Whatever the case. Why the extreme secrecy?
.
Related articles by Tom Pride:
Meet the man Leon Brittan handed the lost VIP paedophile dossier to
High level child abuse cover-up? Why has Theresa May barred a US journalist from the UK?
How MI5 vetted Savile. And decided paedophilia was nothing to worry about.
The truth about the Tory Party’s cover up of its links to paedophilia
Daily Mail ‘fixer’ David Rose defends paedophilia accused and attacks child abuse victims. Again.
Jimmy Savile, West Yorkshire Police and the Friday Morning Club
.
Please feel free to share. And comment.
.
The Coalition Government Colouring and Activity Book is now available for download as a PDF and in print:
Pingback: Why are documents relating to VIP sex crimes being kept secret until 2056? | Alternative News Network
sdbast said:
Reblogged this on sdbast.
LikeLike
chunkyfunkymunky said:
Reblogged this on chunkyfunkymunky.
LikeLike
A6er said:
Reblogged this on Britain Isn't Eating.
LikeLike
l8in said:
Reblogged this on L8in.
LikeLike
penniewoodfall said:
Retweeted! 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Me said:
Without ba Jewdeo Christian ethic these kind of things will only continue.
LikeLike
Me said:
When Jewdeo Christian ethics are removed from the UK these kind of things will only increase.
Serial Child abuse is a satanic religious practice and when government entities hide the abusers and their religulious practices then we need the seperation of “church and state”.
LikeLike
tunefultony said:
The establishment (including the Met Police, CID, MI5, MI6 and The Courts Judges) seem to have ways available of hushing up sensitive names or information. There was the Business of Blair’s D-Notices, for example, gagging the Press from reporting on Operation Ore. Then there was the heavy redaction of the Dunblane Police Report and its suppression for 100 years. Thomas Hamilton was a known unstable paedophile with links to the Scottish Establishment and George Robertson, so it is conceivable that if Hamilton was supplying young boys from the boys clubs he ran to the Scottish elite, they could have had Hamilton murdered and then invented a cover story that he shot a class full of kids then suicided himself with his own gun.
LikeLike
penniewoodfall said:
Why do we not get down to the basic facts?
As to why…….we have ‘abuse’…
Or is that too difficult?
What do you think ‘Me’ ?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Me said:
Without moral restrants we have license to do as we please.
LikeLike
penniewoodfall said:
Best.. then…to do away with moral restraints as they leave us repressed!
Which leads us straight to the problem….n’est-ce pas?
LikeLiked by 1 person
nedhamson said:
Re: Me – Judeo-Christian ethics – with or without them. Sexual abusers, especially those in power over government or religious institutions, and school – all have been taught these ethics and most espoused them but this did not prevent them from exposing those who trusted their ethics to great harm. What would prevent, at least this class of abusers would be not place to hide, having to face a jury and the public, if found guilty. Shielding them simply shields the upholders of Judei-Christian ethics from having to disclose they hide abusers to protct themselves and their pocketbooks and positions.
Your upset with fewer attending or belonging to churches as proof of their ethics is understandible but has little to do with who actually lives according to the common positive ethics of all the recognized religions and systems of ethics that council honoring the individual’s right to not be abused.
LikeLiked by 1 person
nedhamson said:
Reblogged this on Ned Hamson Second Line View of the News.
LikeLike
penniewoodfall said:
‘who actually lives according to the common positive ethics’
A lifetimes work…
We do not see ourselves…..it can lead to madness……we talk a lot about abuse ‘out’ there….I wonder why we do not see our own behaviour……and work on inner change…to be kinder to myself…and thence to others….To honour and respect myself ….what is indeed the relationship that you have with yourself?.
Until that is addressed I am afraid that nothing changes. Mans possible evolution starts with each and everyone of us. It is inner work that is needed.
LikeLiked by 1 person
overburdenddonkey said:
pennie
nonsense, we must boot the toxic crap that gums up our minds and which is always caused by abuse, out of our heads, to restore who we truly are….we are all born emotionally healthy, lovable, sociable, and nonviolent…behaviourism is toxic gossip…
be intolerant of abuse and abusers..see the work of miller, moncrieff, rowe, johnson, whitaker et al…empathy, love and compassion…not sympathy…see what is truly out there, it is not pleasant….
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
Ned – You’re using a rational argument with a religious fundamentalist nutter. I think you’re wasting your time!
LikeLiked by 1 person
FinkFurst said:
“Me” …and does all morality come from your “Jewdeo Christian” god? I can’t say I’ve noticed all the atheists, Buddhists and Sikhs murdering, raping and robbing around here. Is that what they do where you live?
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
Tom – I think this is at the threshold of breaking in a huge way, and it still could go either way. We’ve had our differences, but you’re doing truly important work. Please keep digging, for the sake of the victims who are being abused by people in positions of authority at this very moment.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Me said:
Exactly… These child abusers left their “moral restrants” behind and indulged in their own sexual fantasy on an innocent child, disregarding them and stealing their innocents and God given right to a healthy family life.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
Perhaps you could remind me… which god gave me the right to a healthy family life? There are so many to choose from!
LikeLike
overburdenddonkey said:
me
human beings have been on this earth for well over 1m yrs and the only way we have survived is because we are very social animals…we don’t need moral restraints (chains), they cause a great deal of harm to humanity, as we now witness everyday…see this 5000 yr old settlement http://www.historic-scotland.gov.uk/propertyresults/propertyoverview.htm?PropID=PL_244 it couldn’t have existed without a high level of harmony, socialization, and therefore cooperation…
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
OBD – Absolutely right. Religious moral ‘rules’ don’t stand the test of time. Eating pork many years ago was a bad idea because of reinfection with parasites, but that simply doesn’t apply in a modern society. Perhaps these old religions should come up with some new rules about fat and sugar… or perhaps even about abuse of children!
LikeLike
penniewoodfall said:
Suffering is a strange thing is it not obd?
I am in mind of Nelson Mandela and his reconciliation programme…
How can we ever truly restore who we really are without caring for ourselves and have someone care for us ..abd ?.You cannot change what has happened but you can meet your enemy half way…..sympathy does not come into it. Life and it’s horrors are not pleasant However they exist. We live in a world that is both cruel and wonderful,….It is one of life’s great mysteries…. Compassion is fleeting..as I have always said. Be kind to yourself obd.
LikeLike
overburdenddonkey said:
pennie
woteva, you’ve mixed up too many semantics and connotations for me to answer your post without an essay…i stand by my post above, all the info there …2 things, never meet abusers halfway, never forgive abusers, that’s their problem/loss not the victim’s…perhaps for restore, read recover true self…
LikeLiked by 1 person
FinkFurst said:
Tom – I’m curious, if you or one of your contributors was to write something like “Leon Brittan is a paedophile” on this site, would it result in any action? After all, this site gets high Google positions and it also would for those search terms.
LikeLike
beastrabban said:
Reblogged this on Beastrabban’s Weblog.
LikeLike
Pingback: ‘Paedophilia at Buckingham Palace’ – one of the files ‘lost’ by Leon Brittan | Pride's Purge
prayerwarriorpsychicnot said:
Reblogged this on Citizens, not serfs.
LikeLike
Michael said:
If the average man on the street must pay the price for breaking the law then so should the politicians, NOBODY is above law and justice!
LikeLike
jim said:
you only have to hear whats said between cons to find out about the pedos in high places – well know to the underworld.
LikeLike
jim said:
Click to access Government-Security-Classifications-April-2014.pdf
LikeLike
stewilko said:
Reblogged this on stewilko's Blog and commented:
Absolutely shocking, the abuse of innocent children in whatever for is moraly wrong. The Islands we live in, the UK have strict laws designed to protect children and young individuals. We have, well I thought we did, laws, procedures and professionals. All there for when a crime is reported a duty of care to investigate and report their findings. What is questionable is why these crimes are being “buried”. Which, I believe is a crime in itself. Disgusting
LikeLike
nuhup913 said:
Reblogged this on raggededgehouse.
LikeLike