Tags
(not satire – it’s the UK today!)
Ben and Emma Godsland both worked – until their severely disabled daughter Poppy was born and needed round the clock care.
Poppy’s mother Emma gave up her job to look after Poppy – who needs specialist equipment and care or she will die.
But Poppy’s parents are going to lose their home because the DWP has decided to withdraw their social security payments which helped them to continue looking after Poppy.
Here’s the full story from the Cheltenham Echo:
This government isn’t targeting so-called benefits scroungers.
It’s targeting severely ill babies.
.
Please feel free to comment.
.
Even if you think there is a problem with people
sdbast said:
Reblogged this on sdbast.
LikeLike
xraypat said:
Ghastly govrnment….can’t wait to be rid of them!
>
LikeLike
thoughtfullyprepping said:
Consider this.
Even if some other maggot gets into power, this system won’t change, in fact history has proven that things only get worse for the poor, needy, sick, and elderly.
So why are the UK people sat supporting a system of government that actively targets a sick and disabled babies?
Or, like the rich and politicians, do the majority not give a damn anymore?
LikeLiked by 1 person
beastrabban said:
Reblogged this on Beastrabban’s Weblog and commented:
This is disgusting. It’s yet another example of the attack on the very poorest and most disadvantaged by the government, all in the name of austerity. Or rather, their naked class interest. There really does seem to be no depth that this government won’t stoop to.
LikeLike
Mike Sivier said:
Reblogged this on Vox Political and commented:
Well done, Tom Pride, for finding this story and bringing it to a wider audience. I hope everybody who sees this article shares it.
And remember, if you were thinking of voting for these so-called Conservatives: They don’t target benefit scroungers – they target seriously ill babies.
LikeLiked by 1 person
sandra bowes-rennox said:
THE BASTARDS….WHAT LOW LIFES….NOW IT’S BABY’S…just when i they could get no lower…they surpass themselves….MAY THEY BURN IN HELL…THE FIGHT GOES ON…regards sandra.
LikeLike
edward johnson said:
my sense of trust and wellbeing has just gone through the floor ,well its a fine thing we are trying to make people aware of what changes are happening thanks to mr pride
LikeLike
thelovelywibblywobblyoldlady said:
Reblogged this on glynismillward189.
LikeLike
thelovelywibblywobblyoldlady said:
This government are scum, scum, scum! I notice that Camoron wasn’t bothered about claiming DLA for his son! SCUM
LikeLike
sandra bowes-rennox said:
could not agree with you more….what’s right for the SCUM BAG CAMERON…is another rule for the rest of us….well what goes around….comes around…THE FIGHT GOES ON …regards sandra.
LikeLike
thelovelywibblywobblyoldlady said:
Too right Sandra X
LikeLike
jaypot2012 said:
Because the people are too cowardly and too bloody lazy…
LikeLike
jaypot2012 said:
I often wonder what Cameron would have done if his son was still alive…
LikeLike
jaypot2012 said:
Reblogged this on Jay's Journal and commented:
Low down, rotten bastards…
LikeLike
MrChekaMan said:
What sort of government targets little babies? Even violent criminals generally don’t target little babies and heartily dislike anyone who does. The sooner we get rid of Cameron and the Fib Dems the better. I’m sorry that Cameron’s son died but he shouldn’t kill other people’s children because of that.
LikeLike
Pingback: No safety net - seriously ill babies targeted b...
thoughtfullyprepping said:
Cowardly possibly not after all one voice does not make a impact anymore. L
Lazy, again I’m not too sure.
Apathetic is what is going through my mind i.e. “another cup of tea dear I’m thinking of getting angry”.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
I know this won’t meet with general approval on this web site (that’s an understatement!) but maybe this is the right decision. It appears to be a normal family in most respects – one parent in full-time employment, one full-time parent/carer, and one child. The difference is that the child is chronically sick, but she is apparently receiving good, free care from the NHS (as is her right), So is it costing this family anything above that which all parents of a young child have to manage? Apparently Carers Allowance, Child Tax Credits, Housing Benefit and Child Benefit will still be paid. DLA for children may be necessary as the child gets older, and that has not been excluded.
The real point is that there are FAR more appalling injustices imposed on vulnerable people by this and the previous government than on this family.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
Did Cameron claim DLA? I can’t find any evidence that he did. Can you provide a link to it?
LikeLike
sandra bowes-rennox said:
hi finkfurst…i did hear the LOWLIFE CAMERON…admit to applying for DLA on tv….however he may or may not have got it….it’s certainly not unknown for it to be turned down the first time…so he may have indeed have known the right contacts…i would not it past the shifty little bastard….THE FIGHT GOES ON….regards sandra.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
Sandra – I don’t think you’re right. I think he only said he understood about the form, not that he actually applied for DLA. I can’t find any account on the web of what he really said, can you?
I don’t disagree that Cameron’s a shifty bastard, but he’s a rank amateur compared to Blair!
LikeLike
sandra bowes-rennox said:
i agree…finkfurst…sorry about that my mistake…still you would think that having had a disabled son…cameron would have some connection to the real world…but no…he would rather save money regardless of human cost…he’s a spiv who runs the country willing to barter those he see’s as below him…but this number one lowlife and the rest of the shifty bastards…WHAT GOES AROUND COMES AROUND…THE FIGHT GOES ON…regards sandra.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
TFP – Many people are not supporting the current dysfunctional system of government and democracy in the UK, and hopefully the people of Scotland will become free of it.
LikeLike
sandra bowes-rennox said:
put nothing past the shifty bastard….only bullies pick on those who can’t defend themselves…wealth can protect a lot though…THE FIGHT GOES ON….regards sandra.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
“WHAT GOES AROUND COMES AROUND…”
Sadly, usually it doesn’t.
LikeLike
overburdenddonkey said:
f f
hi, and in passing, see motherwell meeting 8/4/14 should “scotland be indy” on youtube….well worth a look….
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
Scotland will be rid of them… and then you in England will have a Tory government for the rest of your life.
LikeLike
AL said:
Targeting benefit scroungers is tricky. What is scrounger? Can we be sure? Easier to say everyone on benefits is a scounger and victimise them in the hopes of detering others from claiming.
LikeLike
thelovelywibblywobblyoldlady said:
No link I’m afraid, just remember reading it somewhere
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
You vaguely remember reading something somewhere? Wibblywobbly – Yes. Lovely – No.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
OBD – I’m afraid I’m not very interested in one-sided rhetorical meetings (for EITHER side). I’m only interested in real debate.
LikeLike
ghost whistler said:
I suspect they would win an appeal. I hope so. THey shouldn’t have to go through that. This is like playing chicken with people’s lives!
But the real issue is why is this government so hell bent on assuming the worst of any claimant; not just able bodied unemployed adults, but now desperately sick babies!
Any fool can see this is a genuine case, but the atmosphere at the DWP is so toxic that the default position, even for a baby, is NEIN!
This is utterly wrong. Again: where are the PCS?
LikeLike