(not satire – it’s the Daily Mail!)
“Oh what a tangled web we weave when first we practice to deceive“- Sir Walter Scott
On Sunday the Mail on Sunday did a hatchet job on the Met Office as part of the newspaper’s long-term efforts to discredit and deny scientific evidence of global climate change (warning – more Daily Mail dross):
No, global warming did NOT cause the storms
The ‘article’ was so full of inaccuracies the Met Office even took the unusual step of writing an official response to it today:
Met Office in the Media: response by Professor Mat Collins and the Met Office
But what was most interesting for me about the article was its author – a man called David Rose.
Who is he?
David Rose seems to be what is known by some people in the trade as a ‘fixer’.
‘Fixers’ obviously ‘fix’ things – in his case, Rose specialises in ‘fixing’ tricky problems which are inconveniencing parts of the more conservative parts of the establishment – by using spin, disinformation and pure lies.
Rose is a major player in the disinformation campaign being waged in the media by powerful oil interests and right-wing politicians keen to deny the human causes of climate change. See just a few examples of his many articles here, here and here.
And interestingly, Rose was also a big part of the disinformation campaign that was waged before the invasion of Iraq – see here.
Not only that, but for some years now Rose has been specialising in discrediting child abuse victims who have accused establishment figures of paedophilia and sex abuse, as well as trying to discredit child abuse investigations as a whole – see a couple of examples here and here.
And here’s a previous blog post of mine highlighting how Rose tried to discredit a lawyer who was working on behalf of child abuse victims:
Daily Mail ‘fixer’ David Rose defends paedophilia accused and attacks child abuse victims. Again.
And as if all that wasn’t enough, Rose also used to work on behalf of MI6.
He’s threatened to sue people for saying that before now. But don’t worry folks, he can’t sue because it’s true. How do I know it’s true? Because he’s actually admitted it himself:
In fact, David Rose isn’t a professional journalist at all. He’s more like a professional agent provocateur – paid by powerful interests to smear people they don’t like, lie and spin on their behalf and spread disinformation.
And the best way to counter his lies is to make sure as many people as possible know exactly who he is.
So please feel free to share this information.
.
.
Pingback: Climate-change denier Lord Lawson is an expert – he once wrote a book about dieting | Pride's Purge
nearlydead said:
Reblogged this on nearlydead.
LikeLike
S Bowyer said:
Man made climate change is pure Agenda 21 bullshit. Stop spouting this crap before more people die of cold when the fucking windmills won’t turn.
LikeLike
Ginger Ninja said:
Is he even a real person? I’d like to see a face…
LikeLike
stefanthedenier said:
S. Bowyer
+1
LikeLike
beastrabban said:
Reblogged this on Beastrabban’s Weblog.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
“not satire – it’s the Daily Mail!”… It’s also the Observer and Guardian!
There is a large leap between very bad journalism and being “paid by powerful interests to smear people”? Is there evidence for that leap?
LikeLike
nuggy said:
i agree rose has wrote some crap before now but no his not a paid disinfo agent.
in fact hes no different from most journalists he just prints things without bothering to check weather there true or not.
LikeLike
Pingback: Climate change sceptic Andrew Neil also once thought heterosexual AIDS was a myth | Pride's Purge
rainbowwarriorlizzie said:
Reblogged this on HUMAN RIGHTS & THE SIEGE OF BRITAIN POLITICAL JOURNAL.
LikeLike
rainbowwarriorlizzie said:
Reblogged this on HUMAN RIGHTS & THE SIEGE OF BRITAIN POLITICAL JOURNAL.
LikeLike
guy fawkes said:
I thought David Rose was supposed to be the ex telegraph journalist, ? Johannsen?
LikeLike
guy fawkes said:
Sorry not the telegraph the independent?
LikeLike
nuggy said:
theirs more than one David rose that’s where it gets very confusing.
LikeLike
Paul Smyth said:
Reblogged this on The Greater Fool.
LikeLike
Pingback: Climate change deniers - just who is Daily Mail...
FinkFurst said:
He is ex-Guardian/Observer. Apparently you didn’t bother to look at the links Tom provided.
LikeLike
guy fawkes said:
Actually I used to read his contributions in the Independent, but no I did not look at all of the links but the ones I did look at just named him as David Rose.
LikeLike
guy fawkes said:
ps I am doing my child minding duties during the school holidays, so time is something I am short of to read up on all of the links, unlike you!
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
You used to read his contributions in the Independent??????
LikeLike
guy fawkes said:
Johannson’s I forget his first name, but I believe he was of Dutch Origin used to write for the independent.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
Rose/Johannson… An easy mistake to make, they’re so similar. Are you sure it wasn’t in OK magazine?
LikeLike
guy fawkes said:
Tom pride himself wrote an article about him i.e. Rose and gave his real name as Johannson, go through his archives.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
Ah… so you’re talking about a different journalist, with a completely different name, who wrote for a different newspaper, and didn’t write anything to do with this blog post – That makes sense!
LikeLike
guy fawkes said:
Apologies for my mix up with journalists, the journalist I was thinking of was johan Hari
🙂
LikeLike
guy fawkes said:
johann two n’s.
LikeLike
guy fawkes said:
Be quiet! Johann sounds like Johannson, even though one is a christian name and one a surname and I did state the newspaper he wrote for as the independent.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
…and Hari has absolutely sweet FA to do with this topic!
LikeLike
guy fawkes said:
Neither has football!
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
Have you finally managed to understand that David Rose is NOT an ex-Telegraph or Independent journalist?
LikeLike
guy fawkes said:
Stop milking it! i’m not apologizing to you personally.
LikeLike
FinkFurst said:
Of course not – I’m sure you would admit to being bisexual before you would do that!
LikeLike
guy fawkes said:
I can categorically say I would do neither!
LikeLike
Pingback: IPCC reports 'diluted' under 'political pressure' to protect fossil fuel interests | Digital News Daily CA
Pingback: IPCC Reports ‘Diluted’ Under ‘Political Pressure’ To Protect Fossil Fuel Interests | PopularResistance.Org
Pingback: IPCC Reports ‘Diluted’ Under ‘Political Pressure’ To Protect Fossil Fuel Interests Of Top Greenhouse Gas Emmitters In Saudi Arabia, U.S.,China, & Brazil | The Oldspeak Journal