Tags
(not satire – it’s ConDemNation today!)
I certainly don’t want to be seen as a cheer leader for New Labour – but downright government lies and spin are something I can’t ignore.
Cameron has tried to blame the recent floods on the last Labour administration.
However the figures are very clear – so clear in fact I’m surprised few people in the mainstream press have put them together.
In the 4 years until 2010, government spending on flood defences under Labour rose by 33%.
In the 4 years until now, government spending on flood defences under the coalition has been cut by 27%.
The comparisons can be found in greater detail here:
Flood defence budget cuts: who’s spinning what?
Of course the government could always argue they couldn’t predict the present flooding.
Only one problem with that line of argument.
A rather senior member of the government did predict them way back in 2008 – a certain Mr D. Cameron in fact:
“Most people accept that, with climate change, floods are likely to be more frequent.”
Get out of that one Mr Cameron.
.
Related article by Tom Pride:
Here’s Cameron’s response to the flooding in a nutshell
Cameron announces plan to reduce flooding by forcing it to work in Poundland
Cameron responds to floods crisis by holding a meeting. Named after a snake.
.
Please feel free to comment .
.
Reblogged this on nearlydead.
LikeLike
Pingback: Coalition cut flood defence by 27% - Labour inc...
http://www.centralsomersetgazette.co.uk/Somerset-flooding-EU-plan/story-20556464-detail/story.html Sums it up really
LikeLike
Tom
1) Your link to support “flood defences under Labour rose by 33%” is from a 4 year old page on the outdated DEFRA web site, and even back then it was only a projection, not actual spending.
2) The Coalition 27% spending cut you quoted is also an unattributed and disputed projection from Lord Smith in a 3+ year old newspaper article.
This link – http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-25766564 suggests that spending has been roughly flat since 2007, but that’s a bit too boring, isn’t it?
I tried to find the actual EA year by year spending data since inception in 1996 and I failed. Can anyone else find them? I think lack of transparency and open information from government agencies such as the EA is the real problem. Poorly researched articles and false headlines (and I don’t mean only this one) serve only to make that problem worse.
LikeLike
It’s a 4 year old page because the coalition has deleted the information. This is what you get now: http://www.defra.gov.uk/environment/flooding/funding/allocation.htm
Don’t blame me if the government is trying to hide the facts.
LikeLike
He’s King Cnut
LikeLike
It therefore seems that you agree with me about the real problem. I don’t blame you for successive governments hiding the facts. Uncovering the facts is better than repeating the deceptions, but it’s far more difficult!
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Political Pip Spit or Swallow its up to You and commented:
The figures are arguable but what is not is the state of Englands flood defence system. It needs less talk and since however much was spent there was as usual a complete lack of action that is what needs to happen now: a lot of urgent and continuous action.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Ned Hamson Second Line View of the News.
LikeLike
Is the EA fit for purpose? http://www.insidetheenvironmentagency.co.uk/
LikeLike
Reblogged this on seachranaidhe1.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on The Greater Fool.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Beastrabban’s Weblog and commented:
Yesterday I blogged on the lies Cameron told when visiting the Somerset Levels, in which he claimed that the Coalition had spent more on flood protection than the Labour Party. Tom Pride here provides the figures to show that Cameron was indeed lying. Well, it’s only one more lie from a government that has absolutely no desire to ever tell anyone the truth.
LikeLike
Cameron wasn’t telling the truth, but apparently the spending difference is pretty marginal – £2.341 billion (2011-15 planned) compared with £2.371 billion (2007-11). If Cameron adds some more spending this year then in the future he can probably claim he was right.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Britain Isn't Eating.
LikeLike
Pingback: Bedford Burrow
Pingback: Cameron pledges more bank bonuses and unregulated markets to tackle floods | Pride's Purge
Pingback: Tory council charges £7.50 a sandbag and MP refuses to meet flood-hit residents | Pride's Purge
Pingback: Mr Chope was unavailable for comment. | rail replacement service
Pingback: Cameron ‘forgets’ to apply for EU money to help flood victims | Pride's Purge
Pingback: Twitter parody account critical of government closed down on same day gagging law passes | Pride's Purge
Pingback: Building supplier cashes in on misery and raises prices of sandbags in flood hit area | Pride's Purge
Pingback: Cameron warns floods of government ineptitude “likely to get worse” | Pride's Purge
Pingback: Climate change sceptic Andrew Neil also once thought heterosexual AIDS was a myth | Pride's Purge
Pingback: Lies, damned lies and more lies. | Social Action