, ,

(not satire – it’s the UK today)

London Mayor Boris Johnson has forced the Metropolitan Police to cut thousands of police officer posts in a drive to save money.

But now the Met’ is being forced to use police officers employed by private companies to fill the gaps:


source: servoca-police.com

Surely paying a private company for police officers is much more expensive than employing the officers directly?

Unless of course Boris’s primary objective isn’t to save money but to privatise the  Metropolitan Police instead?


Related articles by Tom Pride:

Met drops Shapps investigation. Police running scared of Tories after plebgate?

Angry police seek right to kettle themselves

Tories on Plebgate: police lied. Tories on Hillsborough: blaming police “contemptible”

Police to shift crime fighting focus away from shagging hippies to catching criminals

Police Chief – police expected to clear homeless, not catch criminals

No link at all between police, paedophilia, plebs and politicians. Probably.

Would refusing to cooperate with a G4S detective mean you could be charged with hindering a police investigation?


Please feel free to comment – you don’t need to register and I’m extremely minimal with the moderating.


If you click on any of these buttons below, you can share this article with other people. Thanks: