(not satire – it’s the Daily Mail!)
Most people will have heard by now of the Daily Mail’s dreadful front page yesterday which blamed the death of six young children on the welfare state.
Personally, I was drawn by the name of one of the two Mail hacks responsible for the story – Paul Bentley – mainly because of his woeful reputation for getting stories so wrong.
For example, in February, Bentley wrote a piece for the Daily Mail eloquently espousing his … how can we describe it …. ‘original’ theory about who was responsible for the horrific acid attack on Naomi Oni.
Bentley’s brilliant investigative journalism lead him to the conclusion that Naomi must have blinded and horrifically scarred herself for life by throwing acid in her own face. In the middle of the street. While getting off a bus.
See for yourself (warning – Daily Mail dross):
Did the acid attack girl do it herself?
Presumably, Bentley’s enthusiasm for his bizarre theory wasn’t in the least bit dented by the fact that the very next day after he wrote the piece – the police promptly arrested two other people for the crime.
Another example of Bentley’s journalistic brilliance was his article about the death of a dog belonging to a huntsman – David Lee Peters – who had been convicted of racist abuse against a hunt saboteur.
Bentley’s ingenious theory about the mysterious death of the animal? The dog was brutally beaten to death by animal lovers, angry about its owner’s involvement with fox hunting (more Daily Mail dross):
Did animal rights activists beat dog to death?
Erm, I don’t really have to explain the flaw in Bentley’s hypothesis that a dog was beaten to death by animal lovers, do I?
So as you can see, Bentley hasn’t exactly covered himself with glory when it comes to journalistic excellence – and that’s why we shouldn’t be too surprised by the appalling level of journalism in his article about the tragic deaths of the 6 Philpott children
However, one question does rather beg itself to be asked, I think you’ll agree.
Why the hell is the Daily Mail still paying this woefully poor hack for such poor journalism?
Is he related to Lord Rothermere or something?
.
Related articles by Tom Pride:
Daily Mail uses dead children to make a political point about the welfare state
Why we need press regulation – primary school teacher bullied by Daily Mail columnist is found dead
Muddleheaded Richard Littlejohn is not only in the wrong …. he’s in the wrong job
Amazing hypocrisy! Sun, Telegraph and Mail use EU Human Rights Convention to boycott press regulations
The Sun, The Telegraph and The Mail – we’re above UK laws so we’ll ignore them
Just 4 billionaire tax exiles – friends of Cameron – will benefit from weak press regulation
Remember this? Murdoch hack drove Denholm Elliot’s daughter to suicide
Oops! Daily Mail gets British immigration test wrong
How Murdoch hack Isabel Oakeshott cold-bloodedly sold out her friend for money
Met Office takes apart Daily Mail climate-change denier and Cameron friend James Delingpole
Daily Mail uses an actress for another story to demonise the working class
Oops! The Daily Mail accidentally supports a fascist party. Again.
Daily Mail ‘fixer’ David Rose defends paedophilia accused and attacks child abuse victims. Again.
Daily Mail Apologises To Its Readers After Admitting Publishing Something True
The Sun, The Mail et al – sorry, did we say 120,000 problem families? We meant 16.
.
Please feel free to comment – you don’t need to register and I’m extremely minimal with the moderating – so please go ahead.
.
By the way, if you click on any of these buttons below, you’ll be doing me a favour by sharing this article with other people. Thanks:
Editor said:
Reblogged this on kickingthecat.
LikeLike
Editor said:
Possibly they can’t get any journalist (aside from Sonia Poulton) with any decency or credibility to work for them!
LikeLike
bobchewie said:
“never let the truth get in the way of a piece of sensationalist bollocks”..
LikeLike
steffi said:
LikeLike
Chris Tandy said:
I guess Mick Philpott wore trainer shoes. Can this odorous footwear be responsible for making him kill his kids? Why is blaming his footwear any more absurd than ‘blaming’ the welfare state?
This is, in any event, a loose cannon (loaded with poisonous grape-shot, however) to steer away from the more embarrassing news regarding Ian ‘£53’ Smith, and the 421,000 + people’s vote of no-confidence in the lying toe-rag.
LikeLike
Editor said:
Bit worried, Mum and Dad claimed child benefit for my sister and I. Are they going to set us on fire….
Dacre had a state scholarship to “University College School,” and presumably a student grant. These are a benefits. Is he going to kill people himself, or is just going to keep letting Littlejohn drive them to suicide….
LikeLike
bobchewie said:
paul dacre curtain twitcher for the nation..
LikeLike
Chris Tandy said:
Was not Philpott in the army in 1978 when he first attempted murder? It won’t look good for ex-servicemen if this be true.
LikeLike
Chris Tandy said:
I doubt if this ex-city trader was receiving much in the way of state handouts. No, she killed her kids all on her own.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-14459954
LikeLike
Chris Tandy said:
Oh, and Harold Shipman was a well-paid Yorkshire GP and a member of the tory party, and for these things I feel we must blame his desire to kill 300 or more aging people under his care. Is that not so, Gideon?
LikeLike
Loverat said:
Perhaps someone ought to check out the Daily Mail’s HR Dept to see who is hiring these gormless fools.
What makes me laugh is they cannot write, they report on pointless stories and get nearly everything wrong. When they do actually get something right and are sued for libel, their useless lawyers settle.
http://www.robertdee.org/apologies_and_corrections/1/63
It’s amazing that anyone pays to read the rubbish they write.
LikeLike
xraypat said:
Amazingly awful stuff from the Daily Mail….
LikeLike
lizzie said:
I notice the Mail heavily moderates comments on its website. I think it deliberately encourages the nastiest right wing comments.
LikeLike
Editor said:
Well they have to keep Richard Littlejohn fully wound up, so they let him moderate the comments, and write quite a few of the others!
LikeLike
toryshitbag said:
Isn’t Child Benefit for people who earn over 50k too? Isn’t it a universal benefit?
How does that effect DLA, JSA and other benefit reforms? – That’s the real point of the idiot hack linking it to welfare.
LikeLike
Speaker for the Commons said:
The underlaying thing about this is The Bible
Fill yer quivers with arrows re kids if you are going to have them
The last thing the faux-Jew zionists want – as we always kick their asses when they get too cocky (every political leader choice you have in the UK is a Jew or has a Jewish linked surname)
If the guy was in the army – has no one thought about him being brainwashed by them and ‘triggered’ into doing violence?
LikeLike
alrich said:
The paradox is that the Mail now acknowledges that “society is to blame” for Philpott’s killings rather than individuals’ pure evil. AN Wilson in the Mail and Ann Widdecombe are at odds about this. http://angryi.wordpress.com/2013/04/05/mick-philpott-welfare-state-gets-the-blame/
LikeLike
Pingback: Call to ban middle-aged men and ice-cream after research shows proven links to murder | Pride's Purge
Pingback: Sun calls for ban on dentists after 98% of murderers revealed to have had dental problems | Pride's Purge