Tags
(not satire – it’s UK today!)
Here are just a few of the millionaire government ministers who gave themselves a tax cut today (if I missed any let me know in the comments):
Lord Strathclyde worth £10m
Philip Hammond worth £7.5m
George Osborne worth £4.6m
Jeremy Hunt worth £4.5m
David Cameron worth £4m
Dominic Grieve worth £3m
Francis Maude worth £3m
William Hague worth £2.5m
David Laws worth £1m-2m
Nick Clegg worth £1.9m
David Willetts worth £1.9m
Theresa May worth £1.6m
Oliver Letwin worth £1.6m
Owen Paterson worth £1.5m
Kenneth Clarke worth £1m+
Sir George Young £1m+
Iain Duncan Smith worth £1m+
Michael Gove worth £1m+
NB Grant Shapps isn’t on the list because it’s his alter ego Michael Green who’s a millionaire, not him.
No doubt some of these people will be helping the economy by spending some of their £100,000 tax cut on bottles of champagne in celebration this evening.
.
Note – a few people have rightly pointed out that ‘worth’ is not the same as net income. The problem is that net income is a meaningless figure – it’s whatever their accountant wants it to be. That leaves us with only their (declared) worth to go on. I agree, it’s entirely possible their accountants will declare these millionaires are so ‘poor’ that they’re not entitled to a tax cut.
It’s still millionaires voting to give millionaires a tax cut though.
.
Please feel free to comment – you don’t need to register and I’m extremely minimal with the moderating – so please go ahead.
.
By the way, if you click on any of these buttons below, you’ll be doing me a favour by sharing this article with other people. Thanks:
davidapthomas said:
You say each of these people is “worth” so much. Is that live weight or rendered down?
LikeLike
bobchewie said:
JUST ADD BEING CAUGHT OUT FIDDLING THE UNEMPLOYMENT FIGURES (see email) AND LYING ABOUT BENEFIT SANCTIONS TARGETS..then you will see we are the bigger fools for putting up with this crap..
LikeLike
Tom Pride said:
Which would you prefer? Ask their accountants. They can make their client’s worth whatever you would like it to be.
LikeLike
Tom Pride said:
Bob – I’ll have a look.
LikeLike
Pingback: Here are some of the cabinet millionaires who gave themselves a tax cut today | SteveB's Politics & Economy Scoops | Scoop.it
drew said:
If only that was the full extent of the list!
LikeLike
bobchewie said:
@TOM thanks its how to make hidden ppl suddenly disappear .by their ‘own hand’ ..weird..
LikeLike
teddymcnabb said:
How many Lib & Lab will benefit, after all they are Tory!
LikeLike
Clive said:
To get a £100000 tax cut from the cut from 50% to 45% you would need an INCOME of £2 million pounds a year, no cabinet minister earns that. The inflated state of UK house prices will account for the wealth of a lot of the people on your list. Ed Milliband and a number of shadow cabinet also have houses worth a million pounds plus and are similarly ASSET RICH.
LikeLike
bobchewie said:
declared or not declared income?
LikeLike
Tom Pride said:
Clive – net income is meaningless. It’s what their accountants say it is. .
LikeLike
Nick Gall said:
I wish that I could think of a suitably witty comment to leave; however, juxtaposing this with the benefit cuts introduced today merely makes me feel physically sick.
LikeLike
Sue Fuller said:
Two points:
– Whether the money is in assets or income is irrelevant. They still have access to the money. And they have income from several sources
– Of course some Labour politicians could be on the list but that’s not the point – they aren’t the ones responsible for this legislation. It’s the work of that unholiest of unholy alliances, the Coalition.
LikeLike
Nigel said:
presumably these figures are income, not assets? Lots of people have income of less than £1m, although they are over the higher rate tax limit, but have houses worth a lot more. Why not a mansion tax – or some higher bands of council tax? But this is what we would expect of both Tory and (now) Lib Dem politicians, who have tarred themselves with the Tory brush by going into coalition. Does worry me that this will help more people to move even further to the right in the “plague on all their houses” mentality.
LikeLike
Julian Field said:
With regard to what these leeches are worth, I’d say those are conservative estimates.
LikeLike
Tom Pride said:
Julian – conservative with a big or a little ‘c’ ?
LikeLike
bobchewie said:
you got the email ok?
LikeLike
Dawn Willis said:
Reblogged this on Dawn Willis .
LikeLike
guy fawkes said:
What about a £1,000 a week per bedroom tax for those in mansions with unoccupied bedrooms.
If politicians have shares in old public now private companies, isn’t this a conflict of interest when awarding contracts or investment even aid when needed to these companies.?
If they are landlords is this not a conflict of interest for politicians when it comes to building more social housing, thus threatening their incomes as private landlords?
Those with money to invest are happy to invest in cheap labour abroad so are they fit to govern this country that so badly needs jobs and investment?
The only thing that is considered to be a conflict of interest for politicians is if they are sitting on boards of the above companies not that they have a lot of their inheritance invested in them.
Monopolies are supposed to be outlawed yet there are conglomerates eliminating any competition.
We need to end all of this corruption.
LikeLike
bobchewie said:
IDS reckons he can live on 53 quid a week..i swear that guy is cracking up..
LikeLike
Iris Jarrett said:
Democracy? Come now ,people
Plutocracy? You can bet your bottom bedroom tax.
LikeLike
Tristram Wyatt (@TristramWyatt) said:
you’re spot on about the mismatch of tax cuts for rich and blizzard of cuts for low paid, disabled and all other benefits. I’m a keen follower of yours. There’s one question though about this list. The cut from 50% to 45% is on income not wealth so while all on the list are likely to benefit, by how much though? (another point is that wealth should also be taxed properly)
LikeLike
Clive said:
I think the higher rate tax cut was wrong but I believe strongly that opposition arguments should be truthful and factually correct. To suggest cabinet ministers are getting a £100000 tax cut is just ludicrous and plain wrong. The problem is that journalists, politicians and political commentators live in a sound bite world and are always looking for eye catching headlines and never mind the facts. A correct headline would be Tories give already overpaid premiership footballers massive tax cut of more than £100000 a year whilst most people suffer a fall in income.
LikeLike
Cluedo said:
And I wonder how many have even more stashed away in tax havens or Swiss bank accounts….. which apparently is a close guarded secret.
Shame on them for trying to make everyone else poorer in their greed for money – more than they’ll ever need. I suppose it’s really all about power.
I’d love to see a breakdown of how each and everyone of them accumulated their wealth. For starters – Iain Duncan Smith has hardly any decent qualifications (he was economical with the truth on his CV) so how has he become so wealthy. Just from marrying money?
The laws will never change if the people making them have vested interests.
I can’t help feeling if the rest of the world changes to BITCOIN – and we leave them with their creative banking it could get quite interesting.
LikeLike
guy fawkes said:
Clive said
“most people suffer a fall in income”, this does not include politicians unless they are voted out of power and into the shadow cabinet.
LikeLike
Derek J Allen said:
I’m worried sick, as I’m sure a load of disabled people are about these cuts. When you just about have stability they go and move the goalposts sweeping away a safety net for a vast number of those unable to work
LikeLike
Left Out said:
Reblogged this on Left Out and commented:
A pertinent post for today – an undeniable example of a government serving their own interests.
LikeLike
Phil said:
Reminds me of Churchill during the war when he couldn’t see why everyone was complaining about the meat ration, because he thought he was looking at a daily ration instead of the weekly one…
Someone needs to tell IDS to do his own shopping once in a while.
LikeLike
C Jennings said:
If this is Public knowledge what the hell else are the claiming for that isn’t 😦
LikeLike
Ann-Kristine Westwood said:
Our household is on minimum wage, we will be thirty quid a week worse off from today. This confirms my astonishment that the scaffolds are yet to be constructed.
Where are the guillotines?
LikeLike
carolecarrick said:
Reblogged this on Carole….
LikeLike
A Crossland said:
You state they are worth xxmillions they are not they have acquired xxmillions
LikeLike
Nicola said:
I suspect he could his larder and kitchen are fully stocked for months – his car and house are paid for ……………….. I would like him to start with an empty tank in his car, half a pint of milk, three potatoes, and a cup of sugar in his cupboards – and prepayment meters for his gas and electricity and have to decide if he eats or switches on his heating.
LikeLike
Bob Howie said:
They are not like normal people as they usually have incomes from other places too, like private functions where they get paid to talk (sorry very bad memory cant remember the term).
When I was self-employed I earned £X in a year but after the accountant took into consideration all my expenses throughout the year it was in fact £Y usually a few thousand less but I didn’t earn a vast amount of money and would get an average of £1000 as a tax rebate.
I wish I was working now!
LikeLike
Bob Howie said:
They forget most people living on £53 have no money in banks or under the mattress, some have no family and wouldn’t ask friends, send him up here I’ll show him what you can do on £53/week……The Westminster Diet…….starve!!!….that should shed a few pounds from the lard-arse
LikeLike
Elizabeth Skelding said:
Tony& Cherie & Gordon Brown must be really pleased as well.Why dont you publish a list of Labour that got us in this mess in the 1st place&thanks to Gordon zBrown i couldnnot afford to retire at 60 &am stiil working at 66.He managed to single handedly wrecked one of the best pension systems in the world .Tony Blairopened us wide open on immigration !
LikeLike
bobchewie said:
“that got us in this mess” that scratched record wore out ages..
LikeLike
bobchewie said:
@nocola ive seen his expenses….53 quid a week? lets not forget tax payers paid for his hoise…and would he have to pay for the Universal Job Match system out of his 53 quid and universal credit too, after all they were his ideas..
LikeLike
Joy birdsey said:
Watch out gov do you know what happens when people are starving?
LikeLike
frank loney said:
Clive fair point but how many of these people are on the basic tax rate id be surprised if any were as they get at least £60 000 for being an MP plus of course all there 2nd, 3rd jobs .. they have
LikeLike
Meg Underdown said:
sign the petition to make IDS live on £53 a week!
LikeLike
Meg Underdown said:
The bankers got us in the mess – Gordon Brown had reduced our indebtedness before the bankers crash!
LikeLike
imblackwillow1 said:
British Bullshit Corporation Newsflash:— Members of the government have been observed making numerous trips to cashpoints, withdrawing large amounts of money and heading straight for the nearest gentlemens club. When our man on the street, Jack Imalright, quizzed one of them, he was told,”We’re helping the economy old boy! We feel a bit guilty about this tax cut, so we’re redistributing wads of cash into the g-strings of some hardworking women in the entertainment sector. After all, if they end up on the streets because of the bedroom tax, we may have to travel miles to make use of their services. And it’s just not on! So we’re ensuring that our favourite dancing whores are comfortable and well cared for, just doing our bit to make life easier in these austere times.” See citizens, they really do care!
LikeLike
jaypot2012 said:
IDS couldn’t even last more than a few days on a tv documentary were he lived with a poor family (I think). He’s of no use to mankind and should have been put on the fire after birth and his afterbirth kept instead! Every time he opens his gob lies spill out. I personally cannot wait for his comedown, I hope he goes with such a huge bang that it can be heard all over the UK – and I think after the bang all you would hear then is cheering and laughing! I hate the “man” and I don’t usually hate anyone as it’s such a strong emotion – but IDS, Cameron and Osbourne I do hate with a passion.
LikeLike
Rhoda said:
We need an uprising from the working class 95% of this country, why are the bulk of the government millionaires? When it is supposedly reasonably cheap to stand as an mp? This government need to be got rid of and fast, a socialist govn is needed, a govn that has just and fair in its vocabulary!! Up the workers!!!!!
LikeLike
Kerry said:
It’s shocking how quickly this elitist government has destroyed everything this country fought hard to be proud of.
LikeLike
Ronnie Gordon said:
Dirty filthy SCUMBAGS, God forgive me for praising them
LikeLike
Iris Jarrett said:
I would suggest guillotining them all but they might end up as a bulking up agent in the economy burgers! And that would further taint the taste. By the way when money is short why not make your own homemade food such as burgers. You could then choose to leave out the antidepressants , the antibiotics and the arsenic ,the yummy ground up chicken feathers , the chicken litter etc etc that your loving leaders wish you to partake of.so that you can lead longer and healthier lives
LikeLike
Ross Of'TheClan Mckinnon said:
Normally I would agree with you Joy, but that was in the days before the water was fluoridated! Remember when fuel went to £1.00 per litre….now its £1.50 per litre & no strikes or blockades…thanks to what I wonder……fluoride no doubt!
LikeLike
earlbramleyhoward said:
Only thing I take exception to in this article is the ‘List’… they may possess the stated amounts of ‘wealth’, but not one of them is “worth” it!
LikeLike
Tim said:
If a reduction of the top rate of tax from 50% to 45% is such disgrace in a civilised society then why was it even lower at 40% for 12 years and 11 months of the 13 year Labour government ?
LikeLike
Pete Stevens said:
Having met every single one of them over the years through work, I’d suggest rendering them down…..
LikeLike
Sue Horder-Mason said:
Personally I hope they choke on their Champagne then it will be our turn to dance on their graves.
LikeLike
H. Deniz said:
A public boiling in oil on Parliament Square for them all. That would bring tourists flocking in.
LikeLike
Ramon Deen said:
when the people say no more to be governed by illuminate secret blood thirsty baphomet devil worshipers ,1000years of skull and cross bones,when the people recognise king selassie i 1st as the earth rightful ruler the christ messiah in this time the world will be 1 and the people will be free,say no more to antichrist rulers,no more babylon system.in this judgement i and i bare witness and testify that all who follow any devil philosophy shall burn in the wicked mans fire.all who trust in the man who rules the gift of life shall be given the earth for there inheritance in a mount zion ithiopia,as in the beginning ,one jah one aim one destiny,king selassie i is alive and well blessed are them and those real people who seek h.i.m.many are called chosen are few.jaaah rastafari everlivin ever sure.firebun the babylon trap rasta free jah people from all captivity….1love seeeeeen.
LikeLike
jimk said:
Plutocracy? Highly appropriate from Mickey Mouse politicians.
LikeLike
Sue Fortune said:
Labr brought in Lord Fraud, ATOS, A4E, bedroom tax on private tenants (not to mention PFI for the NHS and don’tgetmestartedoniraq). They refused to oppose IDS’s recent law change re benefit sanctions. They aren’t the friends of the poor. And name one of them who will refuse to accept a share of the loot when they’re offered a tax cut on their bulging incomes.
LikeLike
Sue Fortune said:
Hear, hear.
LikeLike
Max H said:
The 1% play the dirtiest games you can amagine… no wait: they play dirty games you CAN’T imagine! Every war, every bit of inflation, every false flag (including 9/11) was their work! And now Europe has its own 9/11: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8botvBniEwE
LikeLike
Lee said:
Everything I read about what is happening to our country makes me angry and sick and it’s going to get far worse as all these cuts are no where near enough, just wait until we lose the NHS we have all paid for then we’ll need insurance, there will be blood shed.
LikeLike
Gail Ward said:
well said tom another great piece
LikeLike
bobchewie said:
@jimk i think they are goofy…
LikeLike
bobchewie said:
their latest claim is that 900,000 claimants have panicked and signed off incapaicity benefit fearing being caught by the deadly atos designed to weedle out scroungers..except that this is not true..as the same 900,000 were diverted onto incapacity benefit to ‘hide ‘ them..so..900,000 hidden unemployed have been made to disappear.by their own means…i call that a blatant lie then..as well as the lie over benefit sanctions targets that ‘didnt exist” and were recently discovered all over the country…
LikeLike
Edward said:
You’re a brave man, Clive, trying to inject a modicum of fact into this discussion. Good luck.
LikeLike
Edward said:
Yes it’s been said before, but does that make it untrue?
LikeLike
Edward said:
Reduced our indebtedness? Good lord, where do you get this stuff?!
LikeLike
Edward said:
What wonderful, well-reasoned arguments. Nice to see some things don’t change – envy for instance.
LikeLike
aelthing said:
My blood pressure is already through the roof. Reading this does it no good at all. They may have money but they are still a bunch of twats. Btw where does Hague get ‘is from. Ah thought he were nobbut a grammar school lad w’ nay brass behind ‘I’m.
LikeLike
bobchewie said:
ah the old ‘politics of envy’ routine….that old cliche..that dont work anymore.. you are out of date..
LikeLike
chrissy and simon said:
the trouble is,there are people posting on forums,read skynews forum who agree with what the government is doing.they truly think people on benefits have had a cushy number with lots more perks than the people who go to work. they need to know how much people really get,as there are lies told by the government and the media. as a matter of interest I worked it out a man in his thirties,workiing 40 hours on minimum wage,wife and 2 kids,73 pounds a week better off fact.took into account free prescriptions,school dinners,housing benefit,everything.so when people say you are better off on benefits annd not working,it simply is not true.if you have a sick disabled child,and your life revolves around wether they are going to be ok that day,hospital appointments,disruptions,the distress seeing your child in pain and suffering,having painful,invasive medical tests and procedures,same goes if its your spouse or another famiily member,well yes you do get more,but at what price,its needed for the daily disruption and unpreditability ,and I am sure everyone would rather have a well healthy child/spouse etc that some extra cash.
LikeLike
Davenport said:
Situation normal here usual greedy bunch of Bastards
LikeLike
Dean Burnett said:
What do you expect. We the people let them get away with it! Until we start to take action they will carry on taking the piss in the same way they have done so far. Stop talking about it and start doing something about it!
LikeLike
bobchewie said:
@dean some of us are actually trying to do something…honest guv..
LikeLike
Jez said:
Could the list include:- Tony Blagger Blair, Gordon Moron Brown and all of the past labour party who have not done this country any favours whatsoever?!!! Just saying!
LikeLike
bobchewie said:
@chrissy and simon its cutting through the lies and bullshit thats the struggle…god knows how we try but i no one wants to listen..they play on basic fear and prejudice..
LikeLike
Vern said:
It’s the same in Tory England,
It’s the poor what pays more tax,
It’s the rich what gets the tax cuts ,
Ain’t it all the bleeding same?
LikeLike
aelthing said:
More like an oligarchy. We are back to the 18th century
LikeLike
aelthing said:
I can remember when the Daily Wail ran horror headlines about cabbages costing $1 each
LikeLike
Gail Finney said:
What a shower o shite. Cameron claimed £38 on his expenses for a breakfast….the lot of them want hanging from Tower Bridge . Holy Shit !!!!!!!!!
LikeLike
bobchewie said:
@aelthing were they cabbages from mars? or ”all grown up” cabbages?
LikeLike
bobchewie said:
@gail finney if IDS claimed that on his £53 pw hes be on his way to being skint..
LikeLike
Ellie said:
If only they were ‘worth’ that. *sigh*
LikeLike
aelthing said:
Growed up cabbages methinks
LikeLike
Robin said:
Wish I could have £286 a day tax break. Wish I could have £286 a week!
LikeLike
stuartgauntlett said:
it’s just getting ridiculous. This is so public and barefaced. Guttless barstards. They never had the balls to get into high end business and rob people through the traditional stock markets etc. They would rather profit from the people that they should be helping. The antii Robin Hoods so to speak. They rob from the poor and share with the rich. Their children will be disgusted and ashamed when they grow up unless they are groomed and schooled in greed. It’s only a dog-eat-dog world if you become a dog yourself and then hang out with other dogs!!!!
LikeLike
Pingback: Chris Spivey » Blog Archive » IDS – Taking stupid to an all time low
alan house said:
very well said
LikeLike
bobchewie said:
@aelthing thats the daily heil thing isnt it? type ”all grown up” for daily mail and get streams of articles about young teenage girls who have ‘blossomed’ and yet they discredit child sex abuse victims (curtesy of david rose).
LikeLike
Tom Pride said:
Elizabeth – thank you for so spectacularly missing the point. Labour millionaires didn’t vote to award themselves a tax cut at a time of so-called austerity.
LikeLike
Tom Pride said:
Jez – no the list couldn’t include Tony Blair or Gordon Brown or any of the Labour Party past or present because the list is of millionaire politicians who voted FOR giving themselves a tax cut. All Labour MPs and peers voted against it.
LikeLike
Richard Zenon said:
Robin hood in reverse a simple solution to the crisis money printed by the government debt free interest free they did it in 1914 it was called the bradbury also done by Abraham Lincoln with the green back and this was what the fraudulent bankers though of it However, the response by the private bankers to this sudden threat to their banking empire was swift and brutal as this extract from The Times of London in 1865 shows: “If that mischievous financial policy, which had its origin in the North American Republic, should become indurated down to a fixture, then that Government will furnish its own money without cost. It will pay off debts and be without a debt. It will have all the money necessary to carry on its commerce. It will become prosperous beyond precedence in the history of the civilised governments of the world. The brains and the wealth of all countries will go to North America. That government must be destroyed, or it will destroy every monarchy on the globe,None of this is rocket science – if the Spanish and Greek governments genuinely wanted to put right overnight the economic woes of their countries, they would immediately start printing and supplying interest-free and debt-free treasury notes based on the wealth and integrity of their respective countries. They would also tell the IMF, the EU and the Bank for International Settlements to go and whistle for their ‘money’! Why? Because it was created out of thin air, it didn’t exist in the first place, and the whole banking system is fraudulent…..in other words, see you in a common law court in front of a jury!
Banks, money and finance must exist to serve humanity, not the other way round. Our enslavement by unlawful debt can be ended overnight with one signature by the Chancellor of the Exchequer. It really is that simple!
LikeLike
Tam said:
It’s surely right to object to this tax cut. However, this article confuses assets and income. Someone with assets of £10M will only pay the 45p rate if their income in a given financial year exceeds £150K.
LikeLike
Jacqui wall said:
IDS:
“His claim that he studied at the University of Perugia (founded 1308) was later found to be false after an investigation by the BBC.His office subsequently admitted that he attended the Italian Università per Stranieri (founded 1921) in Perugia for a year but he didn’t obtain any qualifications or finish his exams……
Duncan-Smith’s biography, on the Conservative Party website, claimed he was “educated at Dunchurch College of Management” but following questioning by the BBC his office confirmed that he did not get any qualifications there either, stating that he completed six separate courses lasting a few days each, adding up to about a month in total. Dunchurch was the former staff college for GEC Marconi, for whom Duncan-Smith worked in the 1980s.”
In 2003, Conservative MPs passed a Vote of No Confidence in Duncan Smith, as many considered him unable to return the party to government.
He strikes me as delusional and a liar as well as being someone whose own party members had no faith in. Yet Darling David appointed him to be responsible for our Work and Pensions? Which says it all really doesn’t it? Heaven help us …..
LikeLike
Kathylindsay said:
I suggest Ids lives on £53 aweek f or ha month.
LikeLike
Tigre DarkHouse said:
LikeLike
Tigre DarkHouse said:
Thought an image might help.
LikeLike
Tom Pride said:
Tigre – excellent!
LikeLike
Dawn Williamson said:
As my local MP (I didn’t bloody vote for him!!) Grant Shapps has a flat in Hatfield (unlived in, just used as a postal address) and a large expensive house in the ‘posh’ area of Brookmans Park. I assume he will also be claiming expenses on a central London location for easy access to Westminster as well. This is as well as being the Managing Director and owner of a large printing firm. Anything from him that they dare to shove through my letterbox gets put to good use (after immediate shredding) in the cats’ litter tray.
LikeLike
Tigre DarkHouse said:
Feel free to use it, all images taken from Yahoo!
LikeLike
John said:
What about Geoffrey Cox MP for Torridge?
LikeLike
kevin lolley said:
labour always seem to dodge that question when it comes up
LikeLike
Tom Pride said:
Tim and Kevin – bizarre argument you have there: Labour were crap when they were in power so we’re allowed to be even crapper!
LikeLike
Fedupfifer said:
Best suggestion I’ve read!!
LikeLike
Hafodia said:
Very interesting – but I dispute the use of the word ‘worth’ in this context
LikeLike
Daniel said:
Pray
pray pray pray pray and when your done pray God help us all. Love help us all!! Prayer is the only answer. these people are blind to their real slave masters the demons of the unseen world, our nation has forgotten God and in turn God has let us go adrift to teach us a lesson that we need him. But if we turn from our wicked ways, and seek his face and humble ourselves and pray God will hear from heaven and heal our land. Its a promise right out of the bible.
LikeLike
carl richards said:
appreciate that it’s convenient to attack labour Blair has done very well since leaving office, but maybe you should chk out browns a little more than most do. But if labour did nothing then what is all the fuss about regarding benefits wages, tax credits the NHS public services etc, as labour did nothing what’s being lost?
LikeLike
mybeautfulthings said:
I don’t really understand why we are not all rioting, marching – doing something – as we see the fabric of our society ripped apart so badly it won’t be possible for anyone to put it back together again. I fear for my Grandchildren and their children…… and for all of us 🙂
LikeLike
Nick said:
Unless they ‘earn’ a million, non of them will get a tax cut will they? Be honest.
LikeLike
Tom Pride said:
Nick – net income is meaningless. If you’e a millionaire, it’s whatever your accountant says it is. Or are you arguing that only even richer people than cabinet millionaires should get a tax cut?
LikeLike
Jette Goldie (@UK_Wolfette) said:
Thatcher and co deregulated the banks, privatised the national industries, sold off council housing stocks and got everyone hooked on gambling on the Stock Market.
THAT is what got us into this mess. Blair and his cronies were just too blind to see past the false boom and inevitable (but foreseeable) crash.
LikeLike
sam fisher said:
IDS needs to lead by example and put his (our) money where his mouth is and try live off £53 a week.
signing this petition will help…
https://www.change.org/en-GB/petitions/iain-duncan-smith-iain-duncan-smith-to-live-on-53-a-week#share
LikeLike
Inertia Creeps (@_InertiaCreeps_) said:
And the protests start when and where?
LikeLike
Tony Bradstock said:
I am in exactly the same position as you, Derek. What is going on is obscene. I hate Ian Duncan Smith with a passion and wish the arrogant SOB would drop down dead. Every word that comes out of his mouth is a lie. It seems to me that he revels in taunting us. May he rot in hell for the suffering that he has caused so many ill people. If I could work, I would be doing so, as would the rest of us. Blokes a dangerous pompous fool who deserves to be physically ripped from limb to limb.
LikeLike
Kevin James said:
The govt is there to help the country, not themselves.
LikeLike
Jamie Bell said:
I agree with Kevin James comment “the govt is there to help the country, not themselves’. There is obviously corruption within our govt that needs to be dealt with. How about MPs work for minimum wage so that they are not being scroungers of the state like anyone else is? Council houses are built for everyone in the house of lords and commmons so we do not encounter the vast amount of fraud by MPs in getting tax-payers to pay for their 2nd £Million homes? Those in power can not vote or be part of any decision that involves any business they have direct or in-direct contact with. Politicians/councillors/police will be held accountable for their actions and dealt with twice as severely in court for any crime due to their “abuse of position’ rather than vast pay-outs and a hand-shake.
And why not get actual qualified people like doctors, nurses, teachers, engineers etc, to make the important, and informed, decisions about our country rather than pen-pushers who are trying to please their master?
A few simple ideas but one that will make sure that “we’re all in this together’
LikeLike
rainbowwarriorlizzie said:
Reblogged this on HUMAN RIGHTS & POLITICAL JOURNAL.
LikeLike
Pingback: IAN DUNCAN SMITH | SCROUNGER | Neilscott1's Blog
Improbably Named said:
It’s no small matter that their houses are worth that much. For those who have no houses.
LikeLike
UFOHUNTERORGUK said:
Reblogged this on Ufohunterorguk.com.
LikeLike
James mates said:
At least they are paying some tax rather than the lazy scum living off the state. Blah blah rich people are evil blah blah. These people contribute more in tax to the running of the country every year than most of these commenters will in a lifetime.
fed up with the prejudice against those who have money or work damn hard to be in a position to earn it.
LikeLike
bobchewie said:
And you know this because of what?…
LikeLike
aelthing said:
Earn? Most of this cabal have not ‘earned’ their millions but have inherited wealth. Osborne, for example, as is well known is the heir to a vast fortune made by his family from the manufacture of wallpaper. Their families may have grafted, but they have not. Brought up in a life of luxury, educated with the other toffs at Eton, thrown bread rolls in the Bullingdon Club and been shoed into a safe (Tory) seat.
LikeLike
James mates said:
…and there is your prejudice. So you are saying you don’t like him because of the circumstances of his birth and parentage.He was brought up in an environment that is alien and distasteful to you from your point of view.Get over it.
These comments, IMHO, are no different then picking fun at cultural differences/ race or even physical traits.
LikeLike
James mates said:
Fact, data and research, Not political spin and emotional commentary.
LikeLike
bobchewie said:
Hmm my research differs from yours by a great deal..depends where ‘research’ is done…
LikeLike
bobchewie said:
erm no as it is a good old british tradition to have a pop at our so called betters..if we didnt we’d be stuck forever tugging our forlocks and grovelling..
LikeLike
guy fawkes said:
alething
and being salaried by the taxpayer so that they can pay income tax – if any?
LikeLike
Paula Roscoe said:
Earned? I think that is the biggest joke – these scum have earned nothing and will continue to earn nothing because we the people allow it to continue. I wonder why? What do we have to lose? These scum have taken everything. I wonder what it will take to tip us over? Demand for our first born…?
LikeLike
aelthing said:
James mates
If we followed your argument, we’d still be dressed in smocks and pulling our forellocks at t’maister. To suggest that challenging the inherited wealth and power of our leaders is akin to racism is, imo, sheer nonsense.
LikeLike
Pingback: Here are some of the cabinet millionaires who gave themselves a tax cut today | Pride’s Purge Posted on April 1, 2013 by editor@truth-wars |
Yakoub Islam (@Julaybib) said:
According to PSE, 1 in 12 people in this country does not have sufficient income to buy fresh fruit and vegetables. This is one of the richest economies on earth. It’s a fucking disgrace.
http://www.poverty.ac.uk/pse-research
LikeLike
June said:
Stop me if you have heard this one..
Once upon a time, in the 1930s, a bunch of bullies in a country in Europe decided the best way to run their country was to rid itself of the poorest, sickest and least able. They blamed them for all the ills that befell that country. There was high unemployment but the bully boys spread the word that unemployed people weren’t working because they were lazy. They were made to live in overcrowded homes and became malnourished but were increasingly denied healthcare. Ordinary,comfortable people either ignored what was happening or went along with it. The bully boys made rules and regulations which benifitted themselves and their cronies while insisting what they did what for the good of all. They used the media to insist that the bully boys were the champions of “hardworking families” , implying that all those unemployed or too sick to work were not worth considering.
Yes, you have heard this one….and the punch line is…..?
LikeLike
aelthing said:
Applauds June. Those who forget history are condemned to repeat its mistakes.
LikeLike
Potter said:
If that is including shares and property … They feel piss poor compared to people I know on the dole … My mates who brought places in sw7 w8 w1 twenty five years ago are worth 3 – 4 million and stay in bed all day doing crack!
LikeLike
nedhamson said:
Reblogged this on Ned Hamson Second Line View of the News and commented:
Who turned out to be the April Fools? Those who voted for the current government!
LikeLike
Pingback: Here are some of the cabinet millionaires who gave themselves a tax cut today | doltd
Ulysses said:
Anyone got a Babelfish?
LikeLike
Richard Chisnall said:
don’t get me wrong – i’m as disgusted by this government as you are – but i was under the impression that it was people with an *income* of more than a million who got a tax break? you’ve given details of their worth rather than their income
that no doubt includes many cabinet members
LikeLike
Chas Mumford said:
Of course, the truth of here is that by reducing the rate down from 50% to 45%, the tax yield for the Government. but this is an inconvenient truth for the loony left!
LikeLike
Ulysses said:
Just what the Fuck do you get for a £38 breakfast? When I had a life and income the farmers markets did a breakfast and brew for seven quid that would fill you to the point of lying comatose for 6 hours, so what do get for £38?
LikeLike
Groucho Marks (and Spencer) said:
Is that not the problem, silly sound bites become ‘reality’ for many, especially those most affected by recent changes?
My Mum received a letter some years ago which stated as she had three bedrooms in a social housing home and only three adults where on the electoral roll , she would have to move home or pay an increased level of rent at ‘appropriate market rates’ When she challenged it, she was told to write to the Chancellor ( Brown) as it was ‘law’-actually it wasn’t, it was a proposal by Brown to ‘better utilise existing social housing stock’ funny it wasn’t reported with so much gusto as the obviously politically motivated rants we see in the ‘papers’ each day.
LikeLike
bobchewie said:
@ulysses either gold plated indigestion and a trip to harley street to cure it..or breakfast consists of wine..and more wine…
LikeLike
bobchewie said:
are you related to boris by any chance?
LikeLike
aelthing said:
This point has been made a few times in various ways. What seems to be forgotten is that if the value of their houses is taken out of the equation as non income producing, the rest of their wealth will be. And, I am sure they will have the very best advice from their City pals as to how to maximise that income.
LikeLike
aelthing said:
Best Bolly and caviare, old chap, doncha know. Got to start the day right and to give us strength to grind the faces of the poor.
LikeLike
Teresa Green said:
At the end of an email to RT Hon Oliver Letwin yesterday, I wrote “I forgot to congratulate you on the huge Tax Cut you will be receiving today. Perhaps your conscience would allow you to offer help to your poorest constituents, or to set up some local Food Banks.”
At the end of his email reply this morning, he writes “I am very sorry to disillusion you, but I will not be receiving a tax cut, because my income does not qualify for top rate tax in any event.”
LikeLike
bobchewie said:
MOST OF THEM ARE PISSED BY LOOKS OF IT.SCAMERON LOOKS AS A NEWT MOST OF THE TIME..
LikeLike
Tom Pride said:
Richard – net income is a meaningless figure – it’s whatever their accountants want it to be. That leaves us with only their (declared) worth to go on. I agree, it’s entirely possible their accountants will declare these millionaires are so ‘poor’ they are not entitled to a tax cut.
It’s still millionaires voting to give millionaires a tax cut though.
LikeLike
Angus McPhee said:
No it can’t as Gordon brown dosn’t bother turning up to vote. (lives too far away)
LikeLike
DJ said:
Time to think again about the whole thing?
http://www.realityinfo.org
Peace.
LikeLike
Tom Pride said:
Actually I disagree with this criticism of Gordon Brown. Since when has an MP spending more time in their constituency rather than in Westminster been considered a bad thing?
LikeLike
Simon Everitt said:
You’re right about it being income not net worth that people are taxed on. Shouldn’t we have a tax system that is the same for everyone regardless of their political affiliation? Be nice for everyone to pay their share, be nice if Ed Milliband had paid inheritance tax on his Marxist fathers property investments, but he didn’t, be nice if Ed Balls hadn’t been paid £100000 for writing two pamphlets for Gordon Browns now closed charity, the Smith Institute, but he did. So surely if you want a tax system that applies equally to all corrupt, morally bankrupt political parties then it should be removed from political control? That has some problems to though, no taxation without representation etc. we can either lump up with the system we have or tear it down and try something else, no national tax only regional taxes, with each county making a proportional payment to national policies for example. This would certainly ensure that southern regions had to contribute even more than they do now (like the old Danegeld system really!). I’m sure when labour get back in they will instigate their own changes, perhaps cut the 10p rate again and plunge people like me back off the financial cliff. Personally I’d tear up the whole system and have a go at making real change, but that will never happen as long as we remain in a political system that is little better than a musty party oligarchy
LikeLike
Jim said:
Labour also pissed all the money against the wall in the first place, which is what let the feckin Tories in – they are *totally* responsible for *all* of this.
LikeLike
Henry Galt said:
Google “Marconi deaths 1980s”
LikeLike
Clive said:
Googling Marconi deaths 1980s will get a load of ludicrous conspiracy theories. I worked for Marconi and knew some of the people who died. There was no conspiracy.
LikeLike
Henry Galt said:
I’ll take your word for it then.
LikeLike
bobchewie said:
@JIM thats bollocks..like blaming the victim for the crime ‘just for being there”
LikeLike
Pingback: Petitions Against Austerity & Other Useful Links: | J o h n t e x t
jemmyhope said:
“At least they are paying some tax …”
Some being the operative word. I wonder if any of them would like to tell us how much tax they pay.
Those on benefits pay proportionally the highest rate of tax, via VAT.
LikeLike
Weetam@gmail.com said:
So VAT is above 45% now?
LikeLike
aelthing said:
The important word was ‘proportionately’, or, in other words, that part of total income that is paid in tax. In that caculation, the percentage rates are irrelevant.
LikeLike
Tam said:
Please have a think about what you just wrote. It is logically impossible to have a lower percentage which represents a higher proportion.
There are so many arguments you can use against the tories, but if you make claims that are patently false then you jusy end up sounding like a loony, lose all the arguments, and find people still voting for them in droves.
Just a suggestion.
Otherwise you can move to Scotland where the tories are practically extinct.
LikeLike
Pingback: Here are some of the cabinet millionaires who gave themselves a tax cut today » Philosophers stone | Philosophers stone
Pingback: The UK Government have got it wrong about our Human Rights. | kittysjones
Pingback: Plan B? Cultural hegemony and social entrepreneurship | SLOW SOCIAL
GuinnessGary said:
But they are labour ! It’s the Tories that have voted themselves this obscene tax cut. Also worth noting: every time you hear of this tax cut the figure quoted is the cut on ONE million pounds of earnings – those who earn multi-millions get mutiple tax cuts.
LikeLike
Pingback: Loosening the grip of oligarchy | thenextwave
Pingback: Loosening the grip of oligarchy | Occupy Wall Street by Platlee