(not satire – rape trigger warning)
I’ve just been trying to read up about the crisis in the Socialist Workers Party over accusations senior members were covering up rape allegations against one of its leaders.
I say I was trying to read up about it because I gave up. The jargon, oh the jargon – central committees, dispute committees, steering committees, national committees, district committees – and what the hell are Sino-Seymourites, Bamberyites and Poulantzians?
I could have Googled those terms of course and looked more knowledgeable but I was afraid I’d lose the will to live half-way through the process.
There’s a simple reason why organisations like the SWP will never lead the working class – or any other class – in anything.
Because half the time nobody understands what the f**k they’re going on about.
Which brings me to Owen Jones – who got a bit of stick last month for praising the way George Galloway speaks clearly, simply and directly.
Actually I happen to wholeheartedly agree with Owen about the plain language thing – but obviously Galloway isn’t a great example – not after he did the opposite of what Owen was saying by tying himself in linguistic knots trying to justify rape.
And as for the SWP – doesn’t the well-worn story of a strongly hierarchical organisation trying desperately to cover up sex scandals by its leading members with secret hearings and mysterious-sounding conclaves (committees) while at the same time claiming to occupy the hallowed moral ground on just about everything sound very, very depressingly familiar?
No – as a role model of plain speaking – I much prefer Alexi Sayle’s solution to making politics more accessible:
One of the central problems with politics, particularly Socialist politics as they are currently constructed, is that on a day to day basis they are incredibly boring.
This is not an accident but is a process designed to ensure that only a particular type of individual, specifically those with ……issues to do with the control and manipulation of the behaviour of others are attracted to the business of government and activism. All those with a different view are automatically locked out of the process.
One way to counter this exclusionism is to have balloons and music at all Labour Party meetings and if possible an all-you-can eat buffet offered at a nominal cost. I would suggest £3.50-£4.00.
—Alexei Sayle
The answer to all this – as Alexie Sayle says – is simple. In politics – but particularly on the left – we need more plain speaking, more openness and much much less jargon.
Which brings us back to the discussions on the left about rape.
This isn’t rocket science guys.
If she didn’t consent – or couldn’t consent – it’s rape.
Full stop.
.
Related articles by Tom Pride:
One little word so powerful it lost the Tories the last election (and probably the next)
The Sue Ryder charity and its sinister Orwellian doublethink
Nick Clegg to Lib Dems – “Prepare for Oppositionment!”
War is Peace. Freedom is Slavery. Fewer Affordable Homes is More Affordable Homes
.
Please feel free to comment – you don’t need to register and I’m extremely minimal with the moderating – so please go ahead.
.
By the way, if you click on any of these buttons below, you’ll be doing me a favour by sharing this article with other people. Thanks:
SIMPLY Brilliant x
LikeLike
Pingback: Owen Jones, the SWP, the Pope, Alexei Sayle, George Galloway and Rape | Welfare, Disability, Politics and People's Right's | Scoop.it
I adore alexei sayle…but as someone with Borderline Personality Disorder I’m most cross about the misuse of the term here. It’s associated with early childhood sexual trauma a lot of the time so within the context of this article *probably* not appropriate to use this quote. I love your stuff and Alexei!….but hope this makes you more aware x
LikeLike
Condemn rape, condemn swp kangeroo courts but do not condemn the left per se, we need them in the fight against this fascist government.
LikeLike
Good point. I wasn’t aware of that. Sincere apologies. I’ve redacted the comment but kept the meaning.
LikeLike
Great article – thanks.
LikeLike
All true.. and put brilliantly! Don’t want to spoil the rythmn but also:
‘If he didn’t consent – or couldn’t consent – it’s rape.’
LikeLike
Owen Jones is to stupidity what Superman is to man.
LikeLike
Goodbye. Cheap and untrue attack on the left. Stick to attacking the ruling class parties. No more relayng of your posts onto the 400 members of Cornwall Anti Cuts Alliance. Chris Gibson
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 8:01 AM, Pride’s Purge
LikeLike
C McCarther – what was that I was just saying about more openness on the left…..?
Free speech – gotta love it, gotta protect it, gotta nurture it. Goodbye.
LikeLike
Well said Tom Pride!
LikeLike
Tom Pride
because there has been no legal proceedings in the alleged rape case, I don’t think anyone should be passing judgement on guilt or otherwise and it is common knowledge that organizations such as the swp are at times infiltrated by opponents out to stir up trouble.
LikeLike
Guy – relax. The left have to shake off its thin-skin when it comes to criticism. If a political organisation can’t take criticism – it doesn’t deserve to exist.
LikeLike
It depends if the criticism is based on fact not assumption surely, as for it not deserving to exist, I can think of worse examples of political organizations that do not deserve to exist and have been proved guilty of wrongdoing. I’m sorry but some things cannot be laughed off and no I am not a n swp member, it is you that is showing your political colours on this Tom.
LikeLike
Guy – the criticism is all from inside the SWP itself – not from me. Exactly what political colours am I showing may I ask?
LikeLike
A modern American classic imo is “The True Believer: Thoughts On The Nature Of Mass Movements” by Eric Hoffer. It describes the kind of personality type, alluded to by Alexie Sayle, who crops up in socio-politico-religio affairs no matter what end of the spectrum ( I have never like left/right/etc categories). It’s a form of fundamentalism that can flip from one polarity to the other whilst still retaining the characteristic tendency to impose the persons form of Truth on all others. Somebody can flip from the political “left” to “right” or from being very “religious” to “anti-religious” The cap worn may be different but the person remains the same.
LikeLike
Great article, thanks for posting! The SWP is in such a mess that it’s hilarious – it’ll never be a “vanguard” for anything but it’s so persistent in its exclusion of any intellectual contribution not pinned down to the party line. It’s sad, though, how far radicals have declined since their activities in the 1960s and 70s…
LikeLike
From your posting and relevant links it seems the criticism is from both within and other external bodies who want to have a go at the respect party and Julian Assange also, on issues that are so far unfounded and could well be untrue.
Show me a political party or organization that does not have unrest or criticism within and I will show you a dictatorship.
As for your political colours, well you may be seeing red but your acting blue.
LikeLike
Me acting blue? Ha! Now you’re just being silly.
LikeLike
Absolutely. Just because someone does not say no does not mean it is consensual.
LikeLike
Mark
I wonder what political party you will subscribe to on polling day, I bet you can’t find one that is a vanguard for anything either.
LikeLike
Well perhaps not acting blue! sounding blue, YES.
LikeLike
When the notw printed stories about perverted priests or paedophiles scout masters, they were not a part of an anti Christian offensive or a conspiracy against Baden- Powellism, but because sex stories tittilated their readers and sold newspapers.
The sporadic interest that has been paid by parts of the mainstream press to the implosion of the SWP is similarly, not proof of a witch hunt against socialism. As Orwell observed some things are true even if they are printed in the daily telegraph.
The SWPs defenders wish to obscure that their party’s leadership tried to conceal a n accusation of rape, and when this failed, created a kangaroo court of the accused pals to exonerate him, and then have been prepared to split their own organisation rather than admit they were wrong.
These are the actions of a cult, not a serious political organisation, and the attempts of its supporters, here and elsewhere, to defend it, further confirm its cult like status.
LikeLike
darren williams
I am most certainly not defending rape nor kangaroo courts, I am defending the principle that a person is innocent until found guilty. I do think these accusations proffered by a right wing press,against those predominantly on the left is a witch hunt designed to defame, yet speculation against members of the lords being involved in scurrilous activities brings forth huge payouts.
LikeLike
Guy – you don’t like to let facts get in the way of your opinions do you? These allegations were not “proffered by a right-wing press”. They were ‘proffered’ by hundreds of SWP members themselves – many of whom have resigned from the party over the leaderships’ handling of the scandal.
Or perhaps you regard blogs such as ‘Lenin’s Tomb’ as part of the ‘right-wing press’?
Do me a favour Guy, read this and then we’ll continue our discussion:
http://www.leninology.com/2013/03/the-crisis-in-swp-part-i.html
LikeLike
Tom
I think I have already denounced the swp’s handling of the issue, it only takes 1 incident to get the whole university campus up in arms, so now that others apparently have come forward, this time against whom lenin’s tomb does not state, is it the same person namely ‘delta’? I am not trying to detract from these allegations either,but
the fact remains that the abused student(s) should take their case to as proper court and I reserve my judgement regarding guilt or innocence until the case (s) are proved one way or the other.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on HUMAN RIGHTS & POLITICAL JOURNAL.
LikeLike
Pingback: Owen Jones, the SWP, the Pope, Alexei Sayle, George Galloway and Rape | Human Rights & Political Journal | Scoop.it
Sick to the back teeth of brocialists.
LikeLike
1950’s skirts on 1990’s attitude.
You certainly have 1990’s attitude.
LikeLike
Pingback: No blurred lines – Eddy Shah and co are excusing paedophilia | Pride's Purge
Pingback: The man who destroyed the SWP | Pride's Purge
Here some plain speaking for you….shut the fuck up with the personal who is what and what colour and just debate the fucking story for once eh…..plain enough for you…good…
LikeLike