Tags
(satire – I think)
Lawyers for Lord McAlpine are preparing to send writs for libel to all of the 9,990,000 UK Twitter users who didn’t mistakenly name him or identify him as a paedophile.
In a statement, McAlpine’s lawyer Andrew Reid, of the firm RMPI said he would be seeking damages from those who had not defamed his client on Twitter:
I think most importantly we get an apology and an undertaking from all the Tweeters who didn’t mention my client never to not repeat the allegations they didn’t mention and once we’ve examined the extent of the damage they haven’t done, we’ll agree suitable damages.
The move comes just weeks after Lord McAlpine successfully sued the BBC and ITV for over a quarter of a million pounds for also not naming him as a paedophile but decided against sueing North Wales Police – who did.
.
Related articles:
Justice? McAlpine gets hundreds of thousands in compensation while child victims get next to nothing
I hope Lord McAlpine isn’t going to sue me for saying this?
Why are UK police helping McAlpine sue twitter users when he’s a tax exile in Italy?
Lord McAlpine in his own damning words – The New Machiavelli?
It was the police – not the BBC – who wrongly named Lord McAlpine in abuse allegations
How did Cyril Smith get away with paedophilia? By threatening tweeters and bloggers with libel!
Child abuse scandal can of worms – just who is Daily Mail reporter David Rose?
High level child abuse cover-up? Why has Theresa May barred a US journalist from the UK?
.
By the way, if you click on any of these buttons below, you’ll be doing me a favour by sharing this article with other people. Thanks:
Pride's Purge 
Well
Well i hope dirty den doesnt sue me for him being nicked for being a pervet.
If he wants to send and talk like a nonce on the net thats up to him.
LikeLike
And if lord whatever his name is collects pervy pictures of under age girls then its none of anyones business .
LikeLike
Odd that North Wales Police colluded in harbouring an ex Met chap who drunk driving killed a pedestrian and then possessed child porn level 3. Free Masons Utd!
LikeLike
Same goes for any member of royalist fambly who at certain points in time may have placed their persons in questionable places then we should all shut up and mind our own beeswax and get on with our job of grovelling and forlock tugging.
LikeLike
Ah lets not forget their kind assistance in preventing those trouble making health and safety whinging construction workers from er working.. Communist benefit scroungers all of them.. Probably.
LikeLike
I think we can safely say that thanks to Mr McAlpine the whole #Savile saga has been swept very efficiently under the carpet, so the establishment and the Free Masons maybe win this fight, but Im sure we will win the battle!!!!
LikeLike
Well no actually because word on the street is that similar actions are going on against bloggers now.
Just have to see what happens when the mcmuckrybrass court case happens soon.
LikeLike
Oh you mean that weird rich family who certain members of that family were known to be connected with abuse of children?
Oh them..
LikeLike
I wouldnt know, I dont get out on the streets anymore, as far too many perverts out there, who have far more rights that the rest of us mongrels!
LikeLike
Quite right too, lets protect the rights of perverts, bankers, expenses fiddling MPs , media moguls, entrepeneurial types who get tax payers money whilst wrecking the NHS. And offshore tax fiddlers.. The new jerusalem beckons..
LikeLike
BRILLIANT, once again!!!
Such a smart way of taking him on!!!
LikeLike
When he is in court thats when it starts..
LikeLike
Tom can you figure out why in two or three places now the subject of patrick moore bachelor status has come up..
In a paper now on tv…
LikeLike
Ooh. Am shivering and shaking in my boots (not!!) Fantastic article.
LikeLike
Wasn’t he wedded to his xylophone and/or his telescope?
What wife would have tolerated his music practice or his nocturnal habits?
LikeLike
Lord MuckAlpine would be best advised to let the matter drop, as he will not profit from any action his lawyers might try to take against users of Twitter.
His lawyers would profit, of course, but any action would remind the public of the vile and contumelious allegations – and the more often the public was reminded, the more likely they might begin to believe those allegations.
LikeLike
Because its been written in other places that the charming mr moore had ahem ‘other interests in the sexual area’ of which i will say no more . Just hope he didnt visit schools thats all.
LikeLike
Pingback: Real men prefer women (or men) not girls (or boys) « Pride's Purge
Sorry , what are the allegations again? i forgot..
LikeLike