The government has blasted ‘greedy and spoilt’ child victims of medical negligence for expecting to be compensated for medical blunders which have left them permanently injured or maimed, at the expense of more needy and deserving victims of the recession, such as struggling Goldman Sachs executives.
A spokesperson for the government explained why they have decided to write off a tax bill of 20 million for Goldman Sachs, while at the same time cutting legal aid for child victims of medical negligence worth 17 million:
It would be irresponsible of the government to allow taxpayers’ money to be spent on spoilt and greedy injured children when the same amount of money could be used to help more deserving people, such as struggling Goldman Sachs executives who may have had to go without their usual massive bonuses this Christmas time.
The government is planning to withdraw the right for legal aid in cases of medical negligence, including children, which means only the wealthiest children will be able to claim compensation if they are injured or maimed due to medical errors.
When it was pointed out that the savings made by withdrawing the right to legal aid for child victims of medical negligence would amount to just 17 million pounds, while tax evasion by large corporations such as Goldman Sachs costs the government as much as 25 billion pounds, the spokesperson explained:
Taxpayers’ money should be targeted to help only the most needy in times of austerity such as this. A sum of 17 million could be used to buy a lot of important necessities, such as a couple of villas on the French Riviera for the most needy banking executives, several Ferraris for hard-up derivatives traders and a lot of champagne lunches for destitute government ministers.
.
OK. That was the satire.
These are the facts:
- According to a report by the Parliamentary Public Accounts Committee published today, large corporations still owe H M Revenue & Customs 25 billion this year alone.
- The report also criticises a decision by HM Revenue & Customs to write off 20 million from Goldman Sach’s tax bill – without even being bothered to explain why they came to such a decision.
- It was also revealed in the report that the recently retired head of HM Revenue & Customs, Dave Hartnett, alone had enjoyed 107 dinners and lunches with companies, tax lawyers and advisers over two years.
- The government has announced plans to completely axe legal aid for victims of medical negligence, including children, a saving estimated to be around 17 million.
.
Please share this information if you feel strongly about it.
Please feel free to comment – you don’t need to register and I’m extremely minimal with the moderating – so fire away:
.
Sasha Callaghan said:
I could say a lot but one word will do. Bastards.
LikeLike
Tom Pride said:
Oh yeah. That just about sums up all the arguments in one word.
LikeLike
warriet said:
The Legal Association asked us to point out that won’t be just the crips who suffer as many of its members were wholly dependent on their fair share of the legal aid money and that their members will be suing all those who’d failed to bring case for lost earning,
LikeLike
syzygysue said:
A triumph for, amongst others, Richard Murphy of Tax Research. His finger has been pointed at the now resigned Hartnett for a very long time. And very good to be able to forgive Margaret Hodge for her blairite past… this is a big one.
£25 billion slipped by whilst 17 billion taken from benefits, including slashing benefits for disabled children by 50%.
LikeLike
Tom Pride said:
Yes – all hail Richard Murphy.
Here’s a link to his excellent website:
http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/
LikeLike
Shelly O'Brien said:
I think you’re being awfully kind….
LikeLike
Shelly O'Brien said:
I think you’re being awfully kind….
Ooops, wrong one…
LikeLike
Pingback: Support The Spartacus Report – be part of an on-line and media campaign against the government…starting today. « Pride's Purge
Pingback: Labour ‘too reliant’ on banking community leaders for votes « Pride's Purge
Pingback: Independent Commission – excessive banking can cause blindness « Pride's Purge
Pingback: Lest we forget – in 2007 Cameron endorsed even less regulation of banks than Labour …… « Pride's Purge
Pingback: Government Cracks Down On Banking Scandals By Ordering Urgent Name Change Of LIBOR To TRUBOR « Pride's Purge
Pingback: Banking Scandal – inquiry to be led by experts on corruption, lying and stealing: MPs « Pride's Purge
Pingback: Scientists Claim Tiny Sub-Atomic Traces of Ethics Discovered in Barclays « Pride's Purge
Pingback: Diamond Blames Whitehall Officials For Allowing Him To Be An Obscenely Overpaid Loan Shark « Pride's Purge
Pingback: Senior government adviser warns that problem banking families ‘have too many children’ « Pride's Purge
Pingback: Rat warning as floods flush out pests from city boardrooms « Pride's Purge
Pingback: While the government does nothing about corporate tax evasion – plumbers are going to prison for it « Pride's Purge
Pingback: Ministers Admit Paying Tradesmen Cash-In-Hand To Run Country « Pride's Purge
Pingback: Personal debt to banks: £1.4tn. Taxpayer-funded bailout to banks: £1.6tn. Connection? | Pride's Purge